Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

I’m still ticked off about the two offsides mistakes on Rebs’ 2 pt conversion

Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:15 pm
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Not Phillytiger9
Member since Dec 2015
12029 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:15 pm
What the hell was that about? We stop them there and it changes the mindset of both teams on the last drive imo.

The offense can solely focus on the final drive instead of also worrying about their own two pt afterwards and Ole Miss defense plays more tight knowing they don’t have the two point cushion
Posted by MrWalkingMan
Republic of West Florida
Member since Aug 2010
8725 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:17 pm to
What’s more troubling is that they probably never intended to actually go for it
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
84064 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:17 pm to
It was coaching and it was kinda masterful

You have to give props for doing that in that spot
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
41062 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

What’s more troubling is that they probably never intended to actually go for it


You think?

I figured they were definitely going for it thinking if Lane scored a TD on the road he would go for the win (32-31). I thought it was a smart play assuming that. No way Lane was gonna play for OT unless forced and that's what they did to us.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 6:37 pm
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
1471 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:34 pm to
I have zero confidence at that point in our ability to stop them even from the normal 2pt distance. I mean, yes it's disgusting that we jumped not once, but TWICE, but really don't think they would have been able to deny chambliss there unfortunately
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
26239 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:36 pm to
If we had scored a TD and went ahead 28-24.....the whole game strategy would have been different in LSU favor.....we failed to make 7!!!
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25955 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

What’s more troubling is that they probably never intended to actually go for it You think? I figured they were definitely going for it thinking if Lane scored a TD on the road he would go for the win (32-31). I thought it was a smart play assuming that. No way Lane was gonna play for OT unless forced and that's what they did to us.


They had no intention of going for it before we jumped the first time. They probably had no intention of going for it until we jumped a second time. To do so would have been colossally stupid and deserving of immediate firing regardless of the outcome.

What they intended to do was draw us offsides and get a free play with nothing to lose. You could see it in Trinidad’s body language that he was aggravated they stopped the play. If they convert, great. If they don’t, they kick. THAT was smart. That was their plan.

And then we teed it up for them at the 1 foot line, and THAT was dumb.
Posted by NOSTRODAMUS
Prairieville/Dutchtown
Member since Dec 2003
17045 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

What’s more troubling is that they probably never intended to actually go for it


Correct. If we don’t jump, they take the delay and kick the xp. Huge frick up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram