Started By
Message

re: If the BCS was used for the bowls, LSU to the ...

Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:17 am to
Posted by DaleGribblesMower
Member since Dec 2013
4632 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:17 am to
Lotta cucked figs on this board
Posted by CWilken21
Gnawlins
Member since Mar 2005
4036 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:25 am to
I'd agree this is the best way to determine a playoff.

The polls allow for the balance of people who think that conference champions are more deserving than a team without one.

The computers flat out only care about what happens on the field.
Posted by Maniac979
The Great State of Texas
Member since Jan 2012
1964 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:32 am to
if a frog had wings
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
54847 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:35 am to
quote:

I've always been of the opinion that the BCS system worked fine


As a big numbers guy, the formula used prior to 2003 really was the best one. Factored in wins, opponents wins, quality wins, etc. Your loses were measured by the strength of who you lost to...

Problem was a blue blood didn't benefit (USC) so we had to change that all too fair formula.

Remember that after 2003 it was imperative that whoever made the BCS title game HAD to win their conference. Remember? Every game counted!

Until another blue blood (Bama) couldn't do it on their own with one of the weakest resumes in history...

See where this is going? LOL
Posted by DthVllyDud
Ameritopia
Member since Jan 2011
1365 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:40 am to
Nope, Nope, Nope

We don't need the BCS, because Condi Rice is using her football brilliance to Make College Football Great Again!!!!!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram