Started By
Message

re: If Foster wins his ineligibility appeal, should he be allowed back?

Posted on 5/12/15 at 10:47 am to
Posted by Ldrake53
Member since Feb 2013
2171 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 10:47 am to
Jimbo looked like a coach who wanted to win at all costs defending indefensible behavior, not a coach supporting a player wrongfully accused.

JF screwed up badly and he is hoping his prof allows him to make it up somehow, in the same way a lot of us screwed up at one point and an instructor allowed us to make it up. I don't know why we have turn something so simple into a "wrongfully accused" vs "irresponsible & arrogant terrible person". Neither are true.
Posted by rumbarb83
Member since Jul 2011
53 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 11:03 am to
I have heard the same story along with a few other issues pertaining to the professors unfair treatment of athletes. professor played baseball for two years and had 27 at bats and was not very good. hope there was no resentment of our high profile athletes
Posted by Harry456
Member since Apr 2015
145 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 11:29 am to
It still doesn't mean the coach doesnt know what he did and how to handle his team.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11720 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 11:36 am to
quote:

It still doesn't mean the coach doesnt know what he did and how to handle his team.


I posted that like ten times in this thread. People don't seem to get it.
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
8911 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 11:36 am to
You can't play the kid he is ineligible. How many more dumbass people are going to say why doesn't PM have his back and play him?
Posted by taf
Kansas City, KS
Member since Dec 2003
786 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 11:47 am to
quote:

I have no clue


Correct. You have no clue. That was my point in responding to you earlier.

You don't know what Foster did or didn't do.

All you know is that he was declared academically ineligible. That's it.
You are filling in all of the other blanks yourself.

re: athletes passing legitimately, how that affects the value of an LSU degree, etc.
You have no idea whether any of these are applicable to Foster and this situation. Maybe they are, maybe they aren't.

Why don't you wait and find out what happened?
Posted by Lithium
Member since Dec 2004
63992 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 12:21 pm to
So if he wins his appeal he was never inelidible so he should play. You sound like the BRPD with Collins. Guilty until proven innocent
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71238 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Guilty until proven innocent

this is actually where the burden rests for an academic appeal. the burden is always on the student to prove why he shouldn't have received the grade he did, not the professor to prove why he did. you are absolutely "guilty until proven innocent" in an academic appeal. i have no idea about foster's case outside the rumors posted on here, but when i was in school, academic appeals were very rarely ever successful. honestly the only one i can think of off hand was my buddy successfully appealing a grade and permitted to retake his finals because his mother passed away a few weeks before finals and he was tending to all her funeral arrangements, among other things, right up to the final dates. basically, you better have a damn good reason for your appeal to have a prayer at success.
This post was edited on 5/12/15 at 1:44 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71238 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

You can't play the kid he is ineligible. How many more dumbass people are going to say why doesn't PM have his back and play him?

I think people are saying he wasn't technically ineligible last weekend because grades hadn't been reported yet. However, I'm sure Mainieri got wind of it prior to grades officially being released and decided to play Zardon so he has that many more reps at 2B if Foster's appeal is unsuccessful. They want to play the angle that it's something Mainieri has against Foster, not Mainieri making a strategic coaching decision based on the best interests of his team.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8978 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 4:01 pm to
If he appeals and wins than that means he should not have been ruled academically ineligible, which means there should be no discipline that should be handed out and that means he should be allowed to play with his team. Not fair to penalize someone if they win in appeal.
Posted by HappyTownTiger
Member since Jan 2012
1577 posts
Posted on 5/12/15 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

So you are willing to cheapen your degree by allowing those who don't earn them to receive them, just for one year of baseball?


Yes.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram