- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:49 am to White Tiger
quote:
So his decision to cover up the abuse makes him good people?
That is a very distorted view of what really happened. You choose to believe the worse in him based on biased reporting. If he had truly done anything egregious, he would have been terminated. The president at the time was Thomas Galligan who is extremely well respected. Based on the totality of the circumstances, Ausberry's "failure" to report the battery did not rise to the level to warrant anything more than a suspension. There was no indication that he acted with Malice or tried to do anything nefarious to the two athletes in question. There was also no indication that he committed any self-serving actions or acted with ill intent. He used his discretion that he thought was in the best interest of the two athletes. Now, the rules have been changed and clarified and there is no discretion allowed for non-reporting of alleged abuse no matter how slight or credible.
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 9:32 am
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:56 am to LSU817
I am sure that some other than I objected to retaining Verge, but...
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:00 am to lsuatty1311
Your analysis is epistemically misplaced. The single act of not fulfilling his duty to report was sufficient to terminate him without much discussion. This is a serious allegation and he had no way to know it was not true any more than you know what you what you are saying. He made a plan with that football player to cover it up. Do you just not get this or are you just too emotionally attached to LSU to see it objectively. Rousse upped the ante of this farce by making him "acting AD". WTF does that even mean? The entire thing is absurd and disgraceful, but you do you.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:08 am to lsuatty1311
quote:Great post
That is a very distorted view of what really happened. You choose to believe the worse in him based on biased reporting. If he had truly done anything egregious, he would have been terminated. The president at the time was Thomas Galligan who is extremely well respected. Based on the totality of the circumstances, Ausberry's "failure" to report the battery did not rise to the level to warrant anything more than a suspension. There was no indication that he acted with Malice or tried to do anything nefarious to the two athletes in question. There was also no indication that he committed any self-serving actions or acted with ill intent. He used his discretion that he thought was in the best interest of the two athletes. No, the rules have been changed and clarified and there is no discretion allowed for non-reporting of alleged abuse no matter how slight or credible.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:12 am to 225Tyga
quote:
They are. Because if you know Verge you know hes good people.
Yeah aside from the Husch Blackwell findings I'm sure he's great.
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 9:17 am
Popular
Back to top

0






