Started By
Message

re: How would you feel about a 10-2 season?

Posted on 4/30/16 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48407 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 11:22 am to
Ok I think you're missing what I'm saying about 01. Yes I agree with you it was a talented roster but the team on the field wasn't one of our greatest alltime. These young players we keep going back and forth about were talented and yes a lot of em ended up being pros what I'm trying to get you to see is a player at 18 isn't the same player at 21. Sometimes yes they can be great right away but in most cases they grow and improve mentally and physically. Saban liked to redshirt players you didn't see as many true freshman contributing as you do now. I believe these reasons are why they weren't on the field as freshman.
This post was edited on 4/30/16 at 11:23 am
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Why do need to be everyone's enemy????? You act like YOU are the only one that knows something about football. You are def over the edge with yourself. It's pretty sad.


Youre the laughing stock of this site. youre a drunk momma's boy that thinks because youre closer to death you have better knowledge about sports. The last time we converesed you said inexperience and youth is a just a bullshite excuse.
Madking and I have cursed each other but i respect his opinion because he has actually made decent points and doesnt just regurgitate bullshite he has seen posted on here by other football ignorant posters. I dont even know why you pull for lsu. 90% of your posts consists of shitting on lsu sports. All of them. I just find it laughable that if you held yourself to the standards you hold lsu coaches too, you wouldve blown your brains out.
This post was edited on 4/30/16 at 12:17 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

aban liked to redshirt players you didn't see as many true freshman contributing as you do now. I


Thats on him. In no way does that subtract the player's talent from the team. Contribution and playing time dont affect talent at all.
2001 is easily one of the most talented rosters in lsu history. Saban's decision to not play or redshirt players has no affect on that.
Yes a 11-2 season is better than a 10-3 season.

10-3 with a west title just means the division sucked.
This post was edited on 4/30/16 at 12:10 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

on the field wasn't one of our greatest alltime


Then that's Saban's fault because he clearly had the talent. He had some of the greatest players, at their positions, to ever wear P&G and he lost 12 games in 3 years. I still love ya. Lets let this thread die.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48407 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 1:33 pm to
Ok this is were we differ a 10-3 sec title team could actually mean that the conf was tougher thus harder to achieve the 11-2 mark. But you're right just glancing at the record 11-2 is better than 10-3 on a fundamental level.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204175 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 1:37 pm to
You make me laugh. You are sooooo jealous of me it's kinda pathetic. I am a way bigger lsu fane than you will ever be. You just have zero spine and get all pissy when someone disagrees with you. Like a little crybaby.
Posted by Geauxtexastyger
Member since Dec 2014
559 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 2:36 pm to
Depends on who the 2 losses were against and if the wins were squeaked out using the same tired philosophy.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

You make me laugh. You are sooooo jealous of me it's kinda pathetic.


Jealous? Youre the biggest laughing stock on here. No one values your ignorant opinions.
quote:

You just have zero spine and get all pissy when someone disagrees with you


This coming from the poster that repeatedly posts about wanting to fight punks. Youre a fricking drunk momma's boy that thinks he knows sports simply because you're close to death. Just because youll be dead in decade doesnt mean you know sports.
You never actually talk about the intricacies of the sports youre posting about. You just give horrible predictions and spout bullshite rant myths that youve seen other football ignorant posters, post.
You dont know shite about college football( youth and inexperience doesnt matter) and you know even less about basketball.
Its people like you that make intelligent people question evolution and natural selection. If survival of the fittest were real, youd have died by age 6. But yes continue to think any human is jealous of you. There are people about to take their last breath that wouldnt switch places with you.ya drunk momma's boy.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Ok this is were we differ a 10-3 sec title team could actually mean that the conf was tougher thus harder to achieve the 11-2 mark. But you're right just glancing at the record 11-2 is better than 10-3 on a fundamental level.


So you would take a 10-3 sec title over 12-1 west title.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48407 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 3:00 pm to
I would. To me an sec title is second only to the national champ. Now that's just my preference but I would take the sec champ over the extra 2 wins
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48407 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 3:09 pm to
Here a great example. Which season was better to you the 11-2 07 natty title or the 13-1 season where we lost to Bama in the natty?
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Here a great example. Which season was better to you the 11-2 07 natty title or the 13-1 season where we lost to Bama in the natty?

2011 was far better. 2007 get shite on far more than 2011. Other teams' fans acknowledge how great our 2011 team is and 2007 constantly gets shite on.
2001 sec west was dog shite. We had 2 teams above .500 in conf play.
I realize that title winning teams do get more love and 20 years from now no one will care that 2001 lsu had 3 conf losses. All they will care about is we were champs, so i realize im in he minority.
This post was edited on 4/30/16 at 3:53 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48407 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 4:05 pm to
Fair enough
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204175 posts
Posted on 4/30/16 at 9:33 pm to
Hey dude.... Like I said you get all Pusey and start the name calling when someone smarter than you owns your arse. I bet you are proud to come on a message board and act like a 10 year old when you don't get your way. You call me a mom as boy again I WILL find you. Leave my family out of this. Got it.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46646 posts
Posted on 5/1/16 at 12:22 am to
quote:

name calling when someone smarter than you owns your arse.

I dont get owned because I argue with FACTS. Im sorry my facts make prove that youre a football ignorant poster.
You lnow so little about the actual sport of football that you said youth and inexperience is just an excuse.
quote:

You call me a mom as boy again I WILL find you.


Youre a drunk momma's boy, bitch. Im in Murfreesboro,Tennessee you drunk momma's boy. Let me know when youre close. Ill leave the porch light on.
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 12:27 am
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 14Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram