- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How can a beast of a prospect like RS doesn't get touches
Posted on 10/11/09 at 5:48 pm to LSUStar
Posted on 10/11/09 at 5:48 pm to LSUStar
"too few plays"
"FLA D is th best"
To me, these are the reasons you use the kid. He's a lighting bolt and everytime he touches the ball he gets positive yardage. This Offense sucks and needs to change. Ramming Scott into the LOS all game does nothing and we can't pass block so passing is rven a circus at this point.
"FLA D is th best"
To me, these are the reasons you use the kid. He's a lighting bolt and everytime he touches the ball he gets positive yardage. This Offense sucks and needs to change. Ramming Scott into the LOS all game does nothing and we can't pass block so passing is rven a circus at this point.
0
Posted on 10/11/09 at 5:54 pm to donniebrosco
quote:
re: How can a beast of a prospect like RS doesn't get touches
1) he's not a beast...178lbs. soaking wet.
2) on his first SEC hit he folded like a cheap tent.
3) he is totally one dimensional and floridas defense would have pounded him.
4) Crowton is grossly over-rated.
anything else you need to know?
Posted on 10/11/09 at 5:55 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
) he's not a beast...178lbs. soaking wet.
2) on his first SEC hit he folded like a cheap tent.
3) he is totally one dimensional and floridas defense would have pounded him.
4) Crowton is grossly over-rated.
anything else you need to know?
Naw...that pretty much covers it.
Posted on 10/11/09 at 6:05 pm to Volvagia
Go back to the books..
Posted on 10/11/09 at 6:09 pm to Baloo
quote:
Because LSU only had 33 snaps in the first 3 quarters? And heck, 3 of those were the snaps chucking it up at the end of the half. So, really, there were only 30 snaps, which isn't that many. The offense's failures made it less likely they could mix it up because the offense was always deep in a hole.
True on the lack of snaps.
But we also had like 110 yards of offense before we padded our stats on that last drive at the end, so it could be argued that we absolutely needed some kind of change of pace.
Posted on 10/11/09 at 6:57 pm to shel311
If we had used RS we might have lost the game.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News