Started By
Message

re: Has LSU ever had this much top-line talent in the NFL?

Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by Swain
Member since Aug 2016
404 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:58 pm to
Are you trying to claim guys like Peterson, Collins, and Fournette wouldn't be 5 stars had they not been offered by LSU?
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Don't forget Trai Turner being one of the top young guards.


I don't know how I forgot about him. Good call out.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Hilliard was a pro bowler led the NFL in Tds (


He had one great year and got injured, and was never the same.

Brooks played in one Pro Bowl, and it's a stretch to say that Eric Hill was a "Pro Bowl type". Marshall was easily the best of the bunch, with Thomas a distant second.

quote:

Now does the current group have the ability to surpass them yes but they're nowhere close as of now.


I beg to differ. I would say that the current group far surpasses that group from the late 80's, early 90's already, and will be in a different stratosphere when they are done.

Pro Bowls:
Michael Brooks - 1
Henry Thomas - 2
Dalton Hilliard - 1
Leonard Marshall - 2
Eric Hill - 0

Patrick Peterson - 6
Kyle Williams - 5
Odell Beckham - 3
Andrew Whitworth - 3
Trai Turner - 2
Jarvis Landry - 2
Tyrann Mathieu - 1
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Hilliard was a pro bowler led the NFL in Tds (no current player has)


Doesn't Jeremy Hill have the most rushing TDs the last 3 years or something?

Pretty stout.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 4:45 pm to
Prow bowls don't mean anything now days since there are over 80 to a roster some years. Back then if you were voted you played and there was a 53 man or less roster. So counting pro bowls isn't a good way to compare. And you can knock Eric Hill all you want but we havnt had a lb since who's put up the numbers he has over a career. And there were players I didn't mention who were in that group too. I know being a prisoner of the moment is hard to avoid but arnspargers group accomplished more than the group we have right now. Like I said there are some young stars and with work they can be a great group but they arnt yet.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 4:52 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 4:48 pm to
Hill has done well but I was talking single season. Hilliard had 18 in a year something no other tiger has done since.
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Doesn't Jeremy Hill have the most rushing TDs the last 3 years or something?

Pretty stout.


Hill was excellent as a rookie. But since then, he's averaged just 3.67YPC on 445 carries the last 2 seasons. He has not been good since his rookie season, to the point where the Bengals have said that they will be drafting a RB in the draft and could take one at #9 overall.

Hes got a lot of TDs though, 29 rushing TDs in his career. And that looks good on the surface. But 20 of those 29 TDs were runs of 4 yards or shorter and 14 of them were from 2yards or closer.

I'm not sure what the issue has been with Hill, because he was outstanding as a rookie. But he just doesn't even look like the same player the last 2 seasons. Hope he turns his career around though, because he was great at LSU and 1 of my favorite RBs we've had.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:28 pm to
Wish they'd trade him to someone decent so he could shine. A big back like Hill needs the majority of the carries.
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:37 pm to
2016 - 222 carries (14th most in league)
2015 - 223 carries (10th most in league)

He's gotten enough carries, just hasn't produced.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68466 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:38 pm to
It's not a coincidence LSU just had it's best decade ever in the history of the program. Not a coincidence that LSU had the most wins of any program over about a 15 year period.

Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

I know being a prisoner of the moment is hard to avoid but arnspargers group accomplished more than the group we have right now.


OK, maybe counting Pro Bowl's isn't an accurate measure, but the current group has more than three times as many PB's. That is more than enough to account for the difference between eras.

Let's measure another way. How many Hall of Famers did we have in the group from the Arnsbarger era? Obviously, we don't have any in the current group because they are all current, but Odell Beckham Jr and Patrick Peterson are obviously headed that way. Trai Turner and Tyrann Mathieu (if he can stay healthy for a stretch of 5 years, or so) have HoF potential.

Before you tell me that the current crew hasn't actually done it, yet, I want to point out that none of the 80's crew even remotely were mentioned as potential HoFers at any time in their careers. They just weren't that caliber.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:44 pm to
A lot of them are in their respective teams rings of honor are their teams alltime leader at their respective positions and they have quite a few Super Bowls. Like I keep saying this group can be the best but arnt there yet. Example Eric Martin 553 receptions to Odell's 288. On pace but not there yet.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 5:52 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:45 pm to
13.75 carries per game is plenty? Ok
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 6:04 pm to
He was outstanding his rookie season and had 222 carries that year, the same amount he had this past season and 1 less than he had in 2015. The # of carries wasn't a problem for him then, but now it is? He's averaged 3.67ypc the last 2 seasons and you think that they need to give him MORE carries?

And like I said in my previous post, he finished 10th and 14th in the league in rushing attempts the past 2 seasons. It's not like he's getting 4 carries a game. He's getting enough carries, he's just not producing.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

On pace but not there yet.


There and then some. I said "top-line", meaning, top-tier NFL talent. Sorry, the 80's crowd was a group of solid players that had some good seasons and decent careers. Ring of Honor? Who? I don't think any of those guys are even Ring of Honor material, too be honest. Maybe Marshall, but I dunno...

You can make a case that Patrick Peterson is the best corner in the game over the last 5 years. You can make a case that Odell Beckham is the best receiver in the game the last three years - certainly in the conversation. Mathieu at his best was the best safety in the game. Other than Marshall for a two year stretch, none of the 80's guys were ever even close to top tier guys at their position.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:57 pm to
If by solid players you mean a bunch of Super Bowl champions and participants then yea. And top tier, best, elite these are subjective opinion terms no substance to them. The numbers and titles are measurable comparative standards and those favor the earlier group. Initially I just said they were a great group that accomplished a lot and that our current group had the talent to surpass that. But that's not good enough for you. It has to be the older guys sucked or are avg and the new group, even though they havnt accomplished shite except for two of the older guys, are so far ahead of them there's no comparison. Hey man you're right bling bling and swag over championships all day long amarite?
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 7:58 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 8:41 pm to
" none of those guys are ring of honor material'". Except Eric Martin and Dalton Hilliard are in the saints hall of fame I dunno about any of the other guys I don't follow their franchises that closely. Martin retired as the teams alltime leading receiver in every category. Hilliard, Marshall, Thomas and Brooks were all ALL PRO just off the top of my head, not pro bowl, all pro huge difference. Marshall and Thomas have more sacks each than all of our current players combined. Eric Hill was the 10th overall pick, how many Tiger lbs have been taken that high since? I don't know if you've ever seen any of these guys play but you def don't know a lot about them which kinda deflates your argument.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 8:57 pm
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
29973 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:00 pm to
nothing to show for it
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Except Eric Martin and Dalton Hilliard are in the saints hall of fame


But not the Saints Ring of Honor. Big difference.

OK. I've got it. How many times did any of those guys make 1st team all pro? None of them ever have. I was surprised. Not a one of them. I thought for sure Leonard Marshall made 1st team at least once. Nope. Never. Even though he was NFC defensive lineman of the year, there were better guys in the AFC and he got bumped to 2nd team.

The current group had 3 guys on the same squad in 2015. I'm not going to count all of the 1st team All Pros the current team has total, but it's more a lot more than zero. The current squad also has a lot more 2nd team all pros, too. The 80's team had a few: Thomas (2), Marshall (2), and Hilliard (1), but the current squad has more. Eric Martin never made 1st or 2nd team All Pro, that I'm aware of. The thing is, even though the current squad has more All Pro honors already, I have a feeling they have a few more in them.

I went to LSU during the 80's. I would follow them. It remember how LSU had a few players that were starters a few that were solid, but they never seemed to have any dominant players.

I think # of All Pro squads is a fair way to compare separate generations, because I agree with you that a couple of the current guys got on the squad as alternates, and it's not fair to compare using that measure. All Pro is fair, though.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 10:11 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47708 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:19 pm to
Sorry that's what I meant hall of fame my bad.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 10:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram