- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hannigrif says Orgeron made Canada makes changes by game 3.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:05 pm to Goldrush25
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:05 pm to Goldrush25
Again, this is old shite that doesn't need to be rehashed.
In 2018 we were 10-3 and ranked #6. The team made progress and things are trending in the right direction instead of being stuck in neutral or regressing.
For what it's worth the 2017 Canada wasn't setting the world on fire in those first few games. Regardless, it's ancient history. Move the frick on.
In 2018 we were 10-3 and ranked #6. The team made progress and things are trending in the right direction instead of being stuck in neutral or regressing.
For what it's worth the 2017 Canada wasn't setting the world on fire in those first few games. Regardless, it's ancient history. Move the frick on.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Is this the weekly "fuq each other over thread" x 70 pages....just checking so as to not miss the fun!



Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:11 pm to JohnnyU
quote:
Again, this is old shite that doesn't need to be rehashed.
In 2018 we were 10-3 and ranked #6. The team made progress and things are trending in the right direction instead of being stuck in neutral or regressing.
^This^
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:14 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Saban's been on camera far more often than our HC, and he's had plenty of opportunity to say things like "I'm the head coach, we do what I say" and he's never done
Enough of this shite. Saban is famous for blowing his stack on the sidelines. Several posters in this thread have been posting things that just aren't based in reality.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
It's not even worth the effort for me to link the article because I know even when I prove you completely wrong, you'll either vanish for an hour or so then come back like I didn't just pants you on here, or you'll keep asking the same question expecting a different answer. Go look it up, even Buckeye, your buddy is backing me up.
There is a 0% chance of you admitting you were wrong so we can just agree to end this and you can keep your lunch money today.
There is a 0% chance of you admitting you were wrong so we can just agree to end this and you can keep your lunch money today.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:19 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
It's not even worth the effort for me to link the article because I know even when I prove you completely wrong,
Do it.
I take this as an admission of defeat
The quote has been posted in this thread btw.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He said he eliminated some presnap movements. Outside of that the offense was exactly the same.
In fact, the offense was exactly the same in game 10 as it was in game 1.
in 2 posts you went from trying to get someone to verify it to it being a fact.
you're a clown
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:23 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
in 2 posts you went from trying to get someone to verify it to it being a fact.
Shocking! Trying o get Goldfish to back up his claim. And he cant
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:26 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Several posters in this thread have been posting things that just aren't based in reality.
yeah we have all seen you posting ben.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
It's just that it's been accepted as a fact by everyone else on this board but you apparently.
You are so obviously wrong. Even your allies are saying as much. I feel like I'm being played by continuing to entertain your ridiculous argument like the joke is on me or something.
You are so obviously wrong. Even your allies are saying as much. I feel like I'm being played by continuing to entertain your ridiculous argument like the joke is on me or something.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:26 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
It's not even worth the effort for me to link the article because I know even when I prove you completely wrong, you'll either vanish for an hour or so then come back like I didn't just pants you on here, or you'll keep asking the same question expecting a different answer. Go look it up, even Buckeye, your buddy is backing me up.
Yea, NOT backing you up. I used the term "meddled" ironically. You claim O said it specifically.
Likely, Canada promised O an elite passing offense, and Canada provided an extreme run-first offense. Canada was toast after those first 4 games when he passed the ball 29% of the time.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Orgeron said it was Canadas offense. The offense never changed. Show me your evidence.
It was the Canada offense and it never changed, save for some motion against Troy. Canada's offense does not employ 4 wides.
quote:
BATON ROUGE, La. — Amateur football forensic sleuths could not help but fixate over one unusual statistic from LSU’s 40-24 win over Ole Miss. Sure, LSU gained 593 yards, 200 of which came in the passing game. But not a single one of LSU’s nine completions was to a wide receiver, which raised some alarm bells about the Tigers’ ability to throw the deep ball when it matters most — i.e., next week’s game at Alabama.
quote:
That’s the buy-in for Matt Canada’s offense. Receivers are often running the ball and running backs are often catching it. At times there’s not much action, but everyone seems to know their time will come when the opposing defense overplays one or the other.
Wide receivers caught 92 passes in 2017.
Wide receivers caught 167 passes in 2018's "struggling offense".
2017
2018
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
or the fact that you admitted you had no verification either way and 2 posts later you were claiming it was a fact.
that's why you're a clown on here.
you repeatedly shite on your own stances because your only consistent stance is blowing Ed Orgeron.
that's why you're a clown on here.
you repeatedly shite on your own stances because your only consistent stance is blowing Ed Orgeron.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:29 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
It's just that it's been accepted as a fact
Here it s
A stupid notion is a stupid notification n regardless of how many people buy into it
This board also bought into a locker room fight on 1-9-12.
The only known thing that was done is reduce motion in one game. Orgeron also openly criticized the play selection but that's for another thread.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:30 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Wide receivers caught 92 passes in 2017.
Wide receivers caught 167 passes in 2018's "struggling offense".
wow. in just 2 years O decimated our once dominant run game.
joking
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:32 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
or the fact that you admitted you had no verification either way and 2 posts later you were claiming it was a fact.
You're just illiterate.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:33 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Canada's offense does not employ 4 wides.


Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
here is your post retard.
do you see where you say you're trying to get someone to verify it?
you're the dumbest thing I've ever come in contact with. there are greeting cards with more intelligence than you.
do you see where you say you're trying to get someone to verify it?

you're the dumbest thing I've ever come in contact with. there are greeting cards with more intelligence than you.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:36 pm to JohnnyU
“ we were 10-3”
10-3 used to be frowned upon. 5-3 was laughed at, but I guess 9-4 with a couple very embarrassing losses makes 10-3 look a whole hell of a lot better than it did.
10-3 used to be frowned upon. 5-3 was laughed at, but I guess 9-4 with a couple very embarrassing losses makes 10-3 look a whole hell of a lot better than it did.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:37 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Back to top
