- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Had Oklahoma State been 12-0 in 2011, is it possible Bama still gets in over them?
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:50 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:50 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Oklahoma State's problem in 2011 is that they were Oklahoma STATE.
Had they been Oklahoma or Texas, they would have played LSU.
This is absolutely on point. There are unwritten rankings in college football. Over time, some changes in the rankings are possible but it takes sustained success or failure. This year wasnt an SEC > ACC thing. Mississippi State would not have gotten in all else being equal to Alabama's season this year.
Alabama is #1 in the unwritten rankings. They are much higher than Florida State. They had to get in. Texas is also higher in the unwritten rankings than FSU, but lower than Alabama. However, Texas had to get in because they beat Alabama this year.
Florida State ranks higher than Washington in the unwritten rankings, but Washington didnt have the injury that could be used as an escape clause. FSU did, so they decided to use that clause.
Rankings each week mean nothing with the committee. The last week, they look at the unwritten rankings and decide which 4 they want in, then figure out how to get those teams in by picking and choosing which criteria matter that day. Its complete bullshite and, silly as it sounds, unAmerican. Everyone is not created equal in power 5 College football.
If its Auburn thats a 1-loss conference champ, FSU is in. If its Oklahoma State thats a 1-loss conference champ, FSU is in.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:24 am to L5UT1ger
The committee was terrified. Came down to who they were least afraid of, and it's Fla State and the ACC.
Bama was whining it's way into the playoffs, and Texas would have raised 10 shades of hell if Bama jumped them.
None of this would have happened if it were Miss State beating UGA, they simply would have been left out. They knock UGA out, and Texas with the HTH gets the 4th spot.
Bama was whining it's way into the playoffs, and Texas would have raised 10 shades of hell if Bama jumped them.
None of this would have happened if it were Miss State beating UGA, they simply would have been left out. They knock UGA out, and Texas with the HTH gets the 4th spot.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:30 am to LSUDonMCO
quote:
Bama bias is a real thing.
It is now, but in 2011 Saban only had one championship with Bama and were coming off an undistinguished 2010 season. Oklahoma State would have been a championship game participant if not for the upset loss to Iowa State.
Oklahoma State's untimely loss to Iowa St and Bama's huge win in the 2012 championship game created the Saban phenomenon we know today.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:54 am to PistolPete45
This years BCS would have been:
1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Alabama
4. FSU

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Alabama
4. FSU
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:59 am to karmew32
quote:
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuated by the sports media.
BINGO
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:25 pm to karmew32
Some of us, including me, are never going to let 2011 go. I still think we should have been guaranteed a co-BCS champion title to play in that game. It was a miscarriage of justice.
Popular
Back to top
