- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Guys, rewatched every play on defense last night
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:42 am
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:42 am
I'll keep this shorter than I did on Tigerbait or TSD . But after rewatching every defensive play a few times, I think the problem was much more scheme than personnel.
We blitzed almost every 3rd down in the first three quarters, they were just horribly designed and executed. We had Alem either dropping in coverage, or having to stunt inside to make room for a blitzer. He rarely got to use his edge speed until the 4th quarter. Same for Nevis, he wasn't freed up until the 4th quarter.
The reason our defense played better at the end is bc we let our DL get after it! Alem and Nevis are studs, we may not need to blitz so much to have a good pass rush.
I'm telling you, we were being too exotic, and not putting our best players in a position to succeed. If we simply let Alem and Nevis get after the QB, we'll be much better than we were on defense. But if we stick with the same 3 man defensive line and zone blitzing we did on Saturday, then Chavis is an idiot.
But I will say this, Chavis definitely has Cutrera and Sheppard playing better football. He's definitely a good LB coach. And despite what everyone is saying, Haley has Woods playing much better than he ever has before.
If we just stick to basics, a simple 4 man rush with timely blitzes, I think we'll be a good defense again.
We blitzed almost every 3rd down in the first three quarters, they were just horribly designed and executed. We had Alem either dropping in coverage, or having to stunt inside to make room for a blitzer. He rarely got to use his edge speed until the 4th quarter. Same for Nevis, he wasn't freed up until the 4th quarter.
The reason our defense played better at the end is bc we let our DL get after it! Alem and Nevis are studs, we may not need to blitz so much to have a good pass rush.
I'm telling you, we were being too exotic, and not putting our best players in a position to succeed. If we simply let Alem and Nevis get after the QB, we'll be much better than we were on defense. But if we stick with the same 3 man defensive line and zone blitzing we did on Saturday, then Chavis is an idiot.
But I will say this, Chavis definitely has Cutrera and Sheppard playing better football. He's definitely a good LB coach. And despite what everyone is saying, Haley has Woods playing much better than he ever has before.
If we just stick to basics, a simple 4 man rush with timely blitzes, I think we'll be a good defense again.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:43 am to ColtsTigers
quote:
But if we stick with the same 3 man defensive line and zone blitzing we did on Saturday
those are staples of Chavis' though, esp. zone blitzing
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:46 am to ColtsTigers
I agree with the addition that we need to focus on tackling during pratice this week. If we wrap up, that was a different game.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:46 am to ATLTiger
quote:
those are staples of Chavis' though, esp. zone blitzing
A little zone blitzing is fine.
He needs to cut out the 3 man rush though. I know that it was a staple for Tennessee, but he didn't have Alem and Nevis there the last few years either. He doesn't need to trick people as much here.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:47 am to The Natural
Zone blitzing will get us no more than 7 wins this year. If you have the talent and speed you need to Bring it...our man coverage will hold up more often than not.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:47 am to ColtsTigers
quote:
ColtsTigers
Thanks. I had similar thoughts. How about the secondary? How would you break that down?
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:50 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
He threw some nice balls," Sarkisian said. "He moved well in the pocket. He kept his eyes up. And that's a good defense, now. That team is going to be competing for an SEC championship, possibly a national championship, and they've got really good players. I'm proud of Jake's performance."
LINK
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:52 am to ColtsTigers
bullshite. Pep Levingston needs to be covering RBs in space to utilize his 6.2 40 speed.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:52 am to ColtsTigers
quote:
, I think the problem was much more scheme than personnel.
captain obvious to the rescue.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:52 am to ColtsTigers
Thanks for being informative and positive.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:53 am to tygerstripes
I agree and we need to ran man to man covergae oe will be picked aprt by the quality QB's in the SEC.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:56 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
Thanks. I had similar thoughts. How about the secondary? How would you break that down?
PP was as good as everyone is saying. I downplayed him this offseason a little bc I didn't think he played that well last year, but he definitely looks ready for a great year. He's certainly talented enough to be a top 10 NFL pick after his Junior year.
Besides that, not good enough. Chad needs to tackle better. I thought Brandon Taylor made a good play or two, which was nice to see. Jai gave up a big play, but actually had pretty decent coverage on it. Hawkins still gives too big of cushions. Hopefully they keep giving Jai the opportunity to compete with Hawk. McCray is McCray, but won't be exposed as much in this scheme. This unit can play better than they did.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 11:58 am to Elleshoe
quote:
captain obvious to the rescue.
Not totally. I've seen a ton of bashing of players like Woods and Alem over the last 24 hours, which is undeserved.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 12:00 pm to Maximus
quote:
bullshite. Pep Levingston needs to be covering RBs in space to utilize his 6.2 40 speed.
That was painful to watch.
Just as bad though was watching Alem drop into coverage about 7-8 times, just for the privledge of allowing McCray or someone else to easily get picked up by the RB.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 12:00 pm to ColtsTigers
quote:
But if we stick with the same 3 man defensive line and zone blitzing we did on Saturday, then Chavis is an idiot.
Isn't this what Pelini did against ASU back in 05? And remember the following week a below average Rick Clausen carved up or defense. You would think by now that Les would have learned his lesson.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 12:12 pm to trstiger
quote:
You would think by now that Les would have learned his lesson.
Nothing will make Miles ever stop playing soft defense and running right up the middle 70% of the time on offense.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 12:17 pm to ColtsTigers
quote:
We had Alem either dropping in coverage
I've been saying this for the last couple of days. The use of Alem was one of my biggest complaints with Chavis' scheme.
#1. Why the hell was he on the SS?? (His weakness is definitely playing the run anyway)
#2. Why was he standing up??
#3. Why the frick was he dropping back in coverage??
Once Alem was put back on the WS (where he belongs and has excelled), our defense got A LOT BETTER IMO...
Posted on 9/7/09 at 12:27 pm to STEVED00
quote:
Brandon Taylor made a good play or two
And several times he was confused and totally out of position.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News