- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand jury to hear LSU football players case Wednesday; DNA inconclusive
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:32 am to jcole4lsu
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:32 am to jcole4lsu
quote:
so qoute doc and ask him not me.
I did. Then you responded to me.
quote:
i never said shite about lee riding the pine, just that without his contribution in at least 2 games... we lose em. period.
its not my job to answer questions based on another poster's assumptions or statements. however that "mastermind" dumbass seems to think lee didnt do shite last year.
I wasn't talking to you. You inserted yourself.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:33 am to Death Before Disco
If JJ is indeed reinstated, what are the chances Chicken can create a JJ vs. JL board? I'm almost certain there would be zero football discussion on the Rant.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:33 am to TheDoc
Um you do know that riding the bench does not equal taking snaps and meaningful ones at that.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:33 am to TheDoc
quote:
Yes, lee rode the bench for the majority of the year.
That's what I was hoping you meant but that's not what you said. I just wanted clarification. You got your panties in a knot when I asked a question.
quote:
You are being deliberately obtuse.
Am I?
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:33 am to 5Alive
quote:
Yea but it took a random act for it to happen. U really think that this vanilla offense is gonna work all year don't u?
Lee already has 4 TD's in three games with one Int on a miscommunication play.
Hes been very efficient. That's all lsu needs. JJ was a turnover machine last year. 10 INT's and 9 fumbles in 13 games.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:34 am to CptBengal
quote:
Does the rant really think that they have the same amount of information that the DA and police have gathered?
There have been several lawyers (one being a prosecutor) on this board say that the DA can basically indict a ham sandwich.
It will be hilarious watching the people on this board meltdown when their "savior" (which is odd because we are winning without him) gets indicted.
It's a real shame that you're still bringing this back to the football field. This really has nothing to do with football anymore to me. Sad that you want JJ in jail because he's a shitty QB.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:34 am to Navytiger74
quote:
And my mother is a psychologist. And I've read many of the books in my parents' library. But I made a point of mentioning wikipedia to make clear that I was joking. I'm not a fricking clinical or behavioral psychologist. If I were, I'd know that I couldn't accurately diagnose some a-hole on a football forum.
Jesus. It's like telling jokes to Germans.
No, it's just a bad joke. Again, your unnecessarily inflated ego telling you it was somehow a "good" joke.
fail dude, fail.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:34 am to Death Before Disco
quote:
Honest question: have any of the witness statements said JJ was not involved in the fight at all? Maybe they conflict about whether he stomped the guy, but do any of the witnesses say he was in the bar drinking a Shirley Temple during the whole fight?
Yes...the motion for a preliminary hearing from a week or so ago basically laid this out. It reads like the complete mirror opposite of the initial report...which is what you'd expect in a he said he said thing.
Of course, we're told here that only a guilty person would declare their innocence like that...so, you know...
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:35 am to 5Alive
quote:
Um you do know that riding the bench does not equal taking snaps and meaningful ones at that.
So he wasn't the 2nd string qb and rode the bench for UNC, majority of vandy, majority of miss state, west Virginia, mcneese, Arkansas, and ole miss?
He didn't play hardly at all in those games.
Unless you think he did?
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:36 am to LSUdm21
quote:
It's a real shame that you're still bringing this back to the football field.
The title of the thread is:
quote:
Grand jury to hear LSU football players case Wednesday; DNA inconclusive
where does that address football field?
quote:
Sad that you want JJ in jail because he's a shitty QB.
I want justice done. If JJ kicked that man, and the police, the judge who signed the warrant, and the DA reasonably believe he did...he should face the consequences of his actions.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:36 am to junkfunky
quote:
quote: uhhhhhhh Lee won LSU at least 2 games last year, so hes pretty much right
How did Lee win 2 games if he was riding the bench?
that was my answer and you quoted me with the question underneath, so ummm. yeah.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:36 am to junkfunky
quote:
Am I?
Yes you are.
He sat/rode/squatted On the bench the majority ofthe year.
He also took snaps in several games because JJ was sucking.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:38 am to TheDoc
quote:
Lee already has 4 TD's in three games with one Int on a miscommunication play.
It's 3 TD's. And the Int did involve miscommunication, but Lee did throw it into quadruple coverage. **Not saying he hasn't played better each week and that he won't continue this trend.
Just trying to keep player assessment's honest.
This post was edited on 9/20/11 at 9:40 am
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:39 am to TheDoc
serious question... is this a joke for some of you? just come on here and argue about the same thing? I'm actually very interested in why and how you would all debate the same thing over and over...
And to be honest, you're all arguing different things against each other.
One group is hoping JJ is innocent... and the other group is arguing that hoping JJ is innocent is the same thing as saying JL sucks.
It's kind of an awkward debate.
And to be honest, you're all arguing different things against each other.
One group is hoping JJ is innocent... and the other group is arguing that hoping JJ is innocent is the same thing as saying JL sucks.
It's kind of an awkward debate.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:39 am to jcole4lsu
quote:
that was my answer and you quoted me with the question underneath, so ummm. yeah.
Keep going. A few more replies and you'll get there. You responded to a reply I made to Doc, so I responded to you.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:39 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:Thanks
GeauxTigerTM
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:39 am to TheDoc
quote:
Am I?
Yes you are.
of course he is. hell he cant even admit he quoted me and replied to me 3 pages back
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:40 am to CptBengal
quote:
where does that address football field?
The thread title isn't the problem. YOU said you don't understand why people want their "savior" back because "we're winning on the filed without him."
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:40 am to Stevo
quote:
Results of DNA taken from suspended quarterback Jordan Jefferson and suspended linebacker Joshua Johns are inconclusive, Moore added. There were no matches to the victims, he said.
Just glad to see our tax dollars at work for a bar fight.
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:41 am to TheDoc
quote:
Yes you are.
Of course I am. That's because you were double talking and not practicing what you preach.
quote:
He sat/rode/squatted On the bench the majority ofthe year.
He also took snaps in several games because JJ was sucking.
Agreed. It helps let others know your position if you use more than a couple words to convey your thoughts.
Popular
Back to top


0





