- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gotta play brooks much more
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:35 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:35 pm to Lester Earl
Don’t be so sensitive Lester. It’s pathetic man,
Btw Lawrence Taylor as a grown arse man with the giants was 6’3” 237. Marcel is 6’2” 200 lbs as a pan 18 year old freshman. Not saying he’s Taylor.
I’m saying your statement that he absolutely has to be 240 lbs is wrong. As is most of your takes.
Btw Lawrence Taylor as a grown arse man with the giants was 6’3” 237. Marcel is 6’2” 200 lbs as a pan 18 year old freshman. Not saying he’s Taylor.
I’m saying your statement that he absolutely has to be 240 lbs is wrong. As is most of your takes.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:38 pm to Solo Cam
Lawrence Taylor hasn’t played in 25 years. And yes, grown arse man. Far cry from 6’1” 195 lol
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:42 am to Lester Earl
Are you saying Lawrence Taylor wouldn’t be good in today’s NFL?
I love how you keep just putting ambiguous numbers on players and say they can’t be good if they don’t hit those numbers. Zions on 6’6” so he can’t play in the post in the league huh?
I love how you keep just putting ambiguous numbers on players and say they can’t be good if they don’t hit those numbers. Zions on 6’6” so he can’t play in the post in the league huh?
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 7:44 am
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:18 am to Solo Cam
quote:
I love how you keep just putting ambiguous numbers on players and say they can’t be good if they don’t hit those numbers.
They aren’t ambiguous
Who are your favorite 6’1” 225 pass rushers?
What about 6’1” 240?
Got any favorites?
I’m not diminishing anything. There’s just a prototype for this type of stuff. College teams pay attention to this stuff and nfl teams surely do.
Sure there are outliers but they are outliers for a reason. No need to get fussy about it. The means always correct itself
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:21 am to Lester Earl
Melvin Ingram is only 6’1
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:42 am to sunnydaze
6’1” 264
That’s a long way from 195
That’s a long way from 195
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:43 am to sabes que
That boy needs to add some rice to his gumbo... he's playing DE at a little below or right at 200lbs in the SEC
His skill jumps off the chart though, he was an animal with the pressures
His skill jumps off the chart though, he was an animal with the pressures
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:50 am to Solo Cam
quote:
Are you saying Lawrence Taylor wouldn’t be good in today’s NFL?
Well comparing him to the best pass rusher ever is ridiculous, but that wasn’t my point. That’s like saying every 6’1” 290 DT will make it cause Aaron Donald can
My point was players have grown at all positions. Lineman on both sides are bigger. LBs and safeties have grown. Weight training & nutrition are much different.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 12:01 pm to Solo Cam
I agree with you he is the real deal. We gotta see more of this guy-- a baller.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 1:00 am to Solo Cam
I rewatched the game. Dude is on fire. And you know the staff knows it. They played him in the biggest game of the year so far in key situations. Chaisson on one side with Brooks on the other. You fricking know that shite is dangerous.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 1:03 am
Posted on 10/16/19 at 7:39 am to deaux
quote:
Between Stevens and Brooks, we have two guys that are absolutely perfect for the S/LB hybrid role in the box.
If Stevens can get better in coverage, he will be a rich man.
The push to play Brooks up front makes me wonder what the staff thinks about his potential in coverage. Or maybe this is just a way to get him on the field faster.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 7:43 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
Stevens is super overrated
He’s a liability in pass coverage vs very good receiving RBs and TEs, but overrated is a reach. He’s very good against the run and as a playmaker in the box.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 7:48 am to Solo Cam
quote:
Stevens played in the box early in the year but after Harris went down he’s absolutely playing a safety role.
He also got specifically targeted by Trask twice in coverage. One was a completion and the other an easy PI call. He’s in that role because of injury, not because it’s his primary strength.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 7:51 am
Popular
Back to top

1






