Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Go for 2 down 24-16

Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:34 am
Posted by Atlbear16
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2017
1453 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:34 am
Kelly is brain dead
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
16937 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:35 am to
No wonder why this state is at the bottom in education. Nothing but retards here.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103982 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:38 am to
Going for two down 24-16 is by far the best statistical play. It gives you two chances to just make one two point conversion

But go ahead and call other stupid when you don’t understand basic logical and data
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 11:39 am
Posted by Perrenial Powerhouse
Madisonville, LA
Member since Jan 2006
3686 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:39 am to
They were down 24-17 you ignorant frick
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103982 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:41 am to
quote:

They were down 24-17 you ignorant frick
wow

Speaking of ignorant
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
22233 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:42 am to
OP is saying we should have went for 2 when we scored a TD to make it 24-16….
Posted by Atlbear16
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2017
1453 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:46 am to
Holy dumb
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
39147 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Going for two down 24-16 is by far the best statistical play. It gives you two chances to just make one two point conversion


And if you miss it… you have to for 2 next time and you have to make it just to turn the score.

The decision to go for 2 was at the end… not at 24-16.

This s why you aren’t paid to coach.
Posted by HEAVYtiger23
Hammond
Member since Mar 2019
446 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Go for 2 down 16-24

I agree 100% we shouldve went for 2. Not because the Pat was blocked bc damn who would’ve thought 2 blocked kicks by 1 team in this game. But, we fought to get back in the game and did so with 0 seconds left on the clock. We had been good at short gains most of the game and they had been the better team for 3 and a half quarters. So where usually I would’ve never said go for two like some underdog team or a team does in a bowl game. But in this game I was screaming/pleading at the tv for us to go for 2 so we wouldn’t have to play overtime.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80112 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:57 am to
Dont bother, this place doesnt understand that type of analytics
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35290 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:57 am to
You should post this on the OT since you’re putting it on every board today.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89444 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

And if you miss it… you have to for 2 next time and you have to make it just to turn the score. The decision to go for 2 was at the end… not at 24-16. This s why you aren’t paid to coach.


Sigh.

It’s well document that going for 2 when you score the first TD in a 14 point game is the right call, if you’re coaching to win the game.

If you’re coaching to just stay in the game longer, you’re doing it wrong.
Posted by Atlbear16
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2017
1453 posts
Posted on 9/5/22 at 12:18 pm to
Okay sounds good. The downvotes are amazing
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram