- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gimmick or Not. What do you prefer?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 9:52 pm to ipodking
Posted on 12/29/17 at 9:52 pm to ipodking
quote:When Orgeron was named permanent HC and assembled his staff, we as fans were given the implicit promise of continuity going forward.
quote:
Matt Canada did nothing on the field to warrant his dismissal
He did nothing on the field to warrant the faux outrage from the rant about his dismissal
The offense struggled early, which was not surprising considering:
a) a new scheme
b) the injury to the key player, Guice
The offense came together as the season progressed, to the point that we finished with a 300 yd passing game. Had a big rushing game in that stretch, too.
As a fan watching the development, you could see that the system was working. WRs were getting open, RBs were getting yards, and what's more, you had multiple secondary players getting bigger roles in the scheme.
A month ago, we were entering bowl season on a high note, and anticipating that Brennan would be indoctrinated in this offense (and Narcisse as well), and the offense would be more explosive.
Now, we're starting over again, for... what?
0
Posted on 12/29/17 at 9:54 pm to msbargas
That USC offense from the 2000s was sexy af
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:15 pm to justice
+1
Exactly. The fact that Canada did good things on offense with a limited QB at the helm seems to be lost on some people. You are exactly right...with a more accurate passer, LSU would have had an excellent chance to beat Bama this year. The plays were there in the passing game, the execution was not.
Exactly. The fact that Canada did good things on offense with a limited QB at the helm seems to be lost on some people. You are exactly right...with a more accurate passer, LSU would have had an excellent chance to beat Bama this year. The plays were there in the passing game, the execution was not.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:18 pm to TigersFan64
quote:
LSU's offense really hit it's stride during that walk through the SEC coaching graveyard.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 2:16 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
LSU's offense really hit it's stride during that walk through the SEC coaching graveyard.
Oh well, some people are never satisfied, it seems. Against Alabama, Canada's offense did much better in 2017 than did Orgeron/Ensminger's offense did in Tiger Stadium in 2016. With a more accurate downfield passer, LSU may very well have beaten Alabama this year. The pass plays were there all night. The receivers simply needed someone to get them the ball on time.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 3:11 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
Anyone who thinks it's just a gimmick doesn't know football or never played.
This. Which is about 90% of this board which leads to nonsensical comments about a “Gimmick Offense”
Posted on 12/30/17 at 3:19 pm to EmperorGout
quote:
Matt Canada did nothing on the field to warrant his dismissal
Rumor has it hurt the waterboy's feelings with a crack about his lack of offensive knowledge.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News