- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Etling is not a "Pro-Style QB" IMO
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:40 am to Salmon
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:40 am to Salmon
quote:
people think Harris is "duel threat" based on absolutely no other evidence other than he is black
Etling is more mobile than Harris
blame suck arse recruiting services who are sheep who follow each others narratives. And then small minded fans carry the torch
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:41 am to sandraccoon
quote:
Your telling me that JR isn't a Mett style QB when the numbers so they are pretty much identical STYLE QBs
I'm telling you that JR was not a complete statue like Mett.
and your numbers actually prove that
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:41 am to sandraccoon
quote:Numbers show that Russell runs better than Mett, which is what y'all are arguing about. Not really sure why you can't see that
Your telling me that JR isn't a Mett style QB when the numbers so they are pretty much identical STYLE QBs
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:42 am to Salmon
quote:
and your numbers actually prove that
You must be a complete moron because the numbers match thus voiding your dumb case
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:42 am to Salmon
quote:
people think Harris is "duel threat" based on absolutely no other evidence other than he is black
Etling is more mobile than Harris
No, people think this because Harris would rather take off running than read through his progressions. He certainly runs a lot better than he passes. That said, he was recruited as a pro style QB because at the high school level he was a beast at throwing the ball.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:43 am to sandraccoon
quote:
You must be a complete moron because the numbers match thus voiding your dumb case
You may want to look at your numbers again.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:44 am to Hugo Stiglitz
Mett was stationary only because he couldn't outrun Christmas. Pro style doesn't mean you can't run.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:44 am to sandraccoon
quote:
You must be a complete moron because the numbers match thus voiding your dumb case
my goodness
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:45 am to Krypto
quote:
No, people think this because Harris would rather take off running than read through his progressions.
uh no
Harris would rather force a pass than run
Harris rarely takes off and runs
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:46 am to Powerman
Etling seems to do a good job sliding in the pocket or stepping up when he feels pressure. He creates passing lanes with his movement and allows a little extra time for receivers to get separation. He can throw on the run, but you don't have to put him on the run to make a throw. He seems equally comfortable under center as he does in the shotgun. He also has enough velocity and accuracy to throw and complete a 15 yard out from the pocket. I think that makes him a very capable qb for LSU's system.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:47 am to Salmon
They were both in the negative for one year and Jamarcus has 142 rushing yards total for the next year. I don't see how 142 rushing yards for an entire season excludes the guy from being a fricking statue lol.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:49 am to sandraccoon
quote:
I don't see how 142 rushing yards for an entire season excludes the guy from being a fricking statue lol.
the fact that he had positive yardage proves that he wasn't a complete statue
sacks count against QBs rushing totals
so considering he was able to 1) avoid sacks 2) make up yardage from sacks proves that he was not a complete statue like Mett
this shouldn't be hard to understand
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 8:50 am
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:50 am to sandraccoon
quote:
I don't see how 142 rushing yards for an entire season excludes the guy from being a fricking statue lol.
You're talking about almost 300 rushing yards difference between the two. That is a huge difference for QBs. I'd normally say something along the lines of "you can't possibly be this stupid," but I think you are.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:53 am to sandraccoon
That yardage includes sacks for QBs. Looking strictly at their gains, which doesn't include sacks:
Mett gained 35 yards in 2013 and 44 in 2012
Russell gained 282 in 2006 and 215 in 2005.
Pretty significant differences. Hell, if you actually watched both of them play, it's pretty easy to see the difference
Mett gained 35 yards in 2013 and 44 in 2012
Russell gained 282 in 2006 and 215 in 2005.
Pretty significant differences. Hell, if you actually watched both of them play, it's pretty easy to see the difference
Posted on 9/19/16 at 9:00 am to Powerman
quote:
He is pretty nimble but I think his reads in the passing game are more important.
This.
He is not super fast or agile, but he has enough athletic ability to get out of trouble and seem to just know exactly when to use it.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 9:01 am
Posted on 9/19/16 at 9:01 am to Hugo Stiglitz
The ability to go through progressions and operate from under center are two marks of a pro-style QB, and he has them both. Plenty of pro style guys are mobile.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 9:17 am to N.O. via West-Cal
I always took pro-style to mean running was always a third or fourth option if no one was open and they work more from under center.
Also Jamarcus could move in the pocket and shake defenders off because of his size but he was pretty much a statue. I remember him getting some decent runs when the field was wide open and he would slowly lumber forward until someone tripped him up.
Also Jamarcus could move in the pocket and shake defenders off because of his size but he was pretty much a statue. I remember him getting some decent runs when the field was wide open and he would slowly lumber forward until someone tripped him up.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 9:18 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:Is Aaron Rodgers pro style?
Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 9/19/16 at 9:20 am to Salmon
quote:JaMarcus was Big Ben like. Could extend the pocket and avoid sacks like a mad man with quicker feet than defenses expected for a big man
I did and do. JaMarcus was not a complete statue like Mett. He wasn't "duel threat" either, but he wasn't a statue.
Popular
Back to top
