Started By
Message

re: Elliot Porter

Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by mgdtiger
Member since May 2006
3254 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:18 pm to
seems like there may have been a rule change in may, not allowing you to count players back to last year if you were at the 85 man limit. My guess is LSU was prepared to do this at signing day, or i could be wrong.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24968 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:19 pm to
The issue is we didn't expect everyone to qualify...when they did, it forces the coaches to ask a kid to grey shirt.
Posted by TexasTigah
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
12183 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:21 pm to
We had like 5 guys who were academic risks, no way the staff thought they'd all make it.

It sucks but that's how it is.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:21 pm to
Another olineman to attrition. Before he even stepped on campus too...

Wing should be greyshirting, not Porter. We don't need a Punter this year.

Coaches must not be too confident in Helton and they want to see what Wing can do. That probably gives them the opportunity to tell the Punter committed now to take a hike if Wing works out early.
This post was edited on 8/3/10 at 3:23 pm
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
32412 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:23 pm to
how can u sign a kid not expecting him to qualify
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:23 pm to
I'm not sure how this all works out though.

With the guys leaving, it doesn't seem like there's a need to make kid's greyshirt...
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Wing should be greyshirting, not Porter. We don't need a Punter this year.


I thought it was a weird choice too.
Posted by TexasTigah
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
12183 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

how can u sign a kid not expecting him to qualify
Guys are signed and placed all the time....Probably what we'll do with D'haquille Williams.
Posted by mmtiger
South Louisiana
Member since Jan 2005
2991 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Wing should be greyshirting, not Porter. We don't need a Punter this year.


+1
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:25 pm to
You can't sign over 25 people and put them on campus. That is the rule. LSU is under the 85 man rule...at least I think they are.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

You can't sign over 25 people and put them on campus. That is the rule. LSU is under the 85 man rule...at least I think they are.



Yeah, I was thinking of the 85 rule. But shouldn't Adams/Washington count back. So effectively taking our class back to 25 men for the 2010 season?

That's why I'm confused...
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
32412 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:28 pm to
fordham and welter were the rants head scratchers..so id assume one of them is next
Posted by TexasTigah
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
12183 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

fordham
quote:

is next
Posted by mgdtiger
Member since May 2006
3254 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:30 pm to
let me expand on the new rule and how it impacted this. i left off details. I am getting this 3rd hand so it can be wrong.

If you had 85 last season, you can't count any January enrolle back to last season's class even if it was under 25 as you could in the past. We gave Graff a scholarship and it put us at 85 last season
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:33 pm to
wow LSU's staff handled something poorly again...shocker
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

fordham and welter were the rants head scratchers..so id assume one of them is next


When it was reported that everyone qualified, Wing, Fordham and then Welter where who I thought of right away as options.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:33 pm to
Just my opinion but I thought their was much better greyshirt candidates outside Porter. But I guess this isn't too horrible considering this basically just frees a spot up for this class instead of signing a greyshirt to this class. I just hope he doesn't end up being a stud. You'd think they had recruits that were more willing to take a greyshirt, not a guy who had offers from programs like Tennessee...

Pretty dumb, IMO. Maybe they just weren't that confident in Porter and felt his projected position had the least need(OG).

Anyways, at least we have a extra spot now for this class.

Also, I'm guessing they did a rule change on players counting back because I'm pretty sure LSU is under the 85 man rule. We have 26 coming to campus now and they need another to greyshirt. That means the counting back rule doesn't work anymore. At least that is what I'm guessing. Would make sense for the NCAA to stop that, IMO.
This post was edited on 8/3/10 at 3:39 pm
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Books


Saban does this shite every year...
Posted by dutchtowntiger100
dutchtown
Member since Aug 2009
2872 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:34 pm to
If he goes on to become an all SEC DL, Miles should be fired!
Posted by BMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
16743 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 3:36 pm to
Fordham will report to camp this week, but he will not be on scholarship. His clock begins ticking and he will have 5 years to play 4.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram