- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DJ Pickett wearing No.5 LSU jersey in Raising Cane’s commercial.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:23 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:23 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 9:24 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:30 am to The Hurricane
Dude is almost as tall as Treydez lol crazy
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:39 am to r0cky1
Yeah, there must be some serious lens distortion there or Pickett had a growth spurt and Green is 6’10”. Leavitt is listed at 6’2” and Seaton at 6’5”.
Would be cool to have 5 and 9 back in the rotation. Maybe let former Heisman winners pick the player.
Would be cool to have 5 and 9 back in the rotation. Maybe let former Heisman winners pick the player.
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 9:44 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:46 am to Buga
quote:
Yeah, there must be some serious lens distortion there or Pickett had a growth spurt and Green is 6’10”. Leavitt is listed at 6’2” and Seaton at 6’5”. Would be cool to have 5 and 9 back in the rotation. Maybe let former Heisman winners pick the player
Pickett does look huge. But no on the numbers. Those should never be worn again. Those 2 guys accomplished something nearly impossible. Numbers should be retired like 20
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:46 am to The Hurricane
I am okay with DJ wearing #5. I could see it being a BK thing that it couldn’t be worn again & now that has changed with the new regime
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 9:50 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:47 am to Seckshavington
quote:
Pickett does look huge. But no on the numbers. Those should never be worn again. Those 2 guys accomplished something nearly impossible. Numbers should be retired like 20
Agree.
Heisman is a good standard for retiring a number.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:47 am to Seckshavington
Yeah, but as we’ve seen even recently numbers can be retired and still be worn.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:49 am to Seckshavington
quote:
Numbers should be retired like 20
Jayden’s jersey will be retired by LSU as will Joe’s but LSU doesn’t retire numbers anymore since new rule in 2007.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:53 am to The Hurricane
Def a weird perspective and as someone mentioned probably the lens is some type of wide angle. So fricking pumped to get these guys on the field!

Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:53 am to JimTiger72
quote:
Jayden’s jersey will be retired by LSU as will Joe’s but LSU doesn’t retire numbers anymore since new rule in 2007.
Ahh I gotcha. Didn’t know there was a rule in place
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 9:55 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:54 am to Buga
quote:
Yeah, but as we’ve seen even recently numbers can be retired and still be worn.
While I would understand fully retiring Nos. 9 and 5 given they were worn by Heisman winners, just like No. 20, I think LSU creates an unnecessary ambiguity by saying they are "retiring" certain numbers without actually retiring them in the usual sense.
Why not just say we are putting (insert player here) into the stadium "Ring of Honor"? That's basically what LSU is doing with Cassanova, Stovall, Alexander, and soon to be Jones given 37, 21, 4, and 7 are numbers that are all still worn by current players. The numbers aren't actually being "retired"
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:56 am to JimTiger72
quote:
Jayden’s jersey will be retired by LSU as will Joe’s but LSU doesn’t retire numbers anymore since new rule in 2007.
Yes - “ the retirement of an athlete’s jersey in a particular sport does not preclude a current student-athlete in that sport from wearing the jersey number in that or any other sport, subject to the discretion of the head coach. This provision applies only to jerseys retired after January 1, 2007. ”
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 10:00 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:56 am to Buga
quote:
Yeah, but as we’ve seen even recently numbers can be retired and still be worn.
While I agree with you here I just don’t think they should be worn again. That’s just my opinion though.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:57 am to Seckshavington
Once a jersey is retired, it is up to the coach’s discretion if it will be reissued.
They have reused every # so far (37, 21, 4) but it seems like Burrow’s #9 is already off limits even though his jersey hasn’t been retired yet. I assume Brian Kelly was set on treating Jayden’s #5 the same but I am okay with the Lane Kiffin staff deciding to re-issue #5. Maybe that changes once his jersey actually gets retired
They have reused every # so far (37, 21, 4) but it seems like Burrow’s #9 is already off limits even though his jersey hasn’t been retired yet. I assume Brian Kelly was set on treating Jayden’s #5 the same but I am okay with the Lane Kiffin staff deciding to re-issue #5. Maybe that changes once his jersey actually gets retired
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 9:58 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 10:03 am to The Hurricane
How about...
Retiring numbers on a side of the ball.
No more Offensive Players wearing 5, 9, 20, etc. Still OK for Defense.
Retiring numbers on a side of the ball.
No more Offensive Players wearing 5, 9, 20, etc. Still OK for Defense.
Popular
Back to top
5





