- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did you know: LSU head of BOS sued Missouri Police Department?
Posted on 4/13/19 at 4:31 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Posted on 4/13/19 at 4:31 pm to ThePTExperience1969
What exactly are you arguing? What point am I missing?
All I'm asking is for you to explain to me how he forum shopped and why the case shouldn't have withstood a 12(b)(6).
All I'm asking is for you to explain to me how he forum shopped and why the case shouldn't have withstood a 12(b)(6).
This post was edited on 4/13/19 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 4/13/19 at 5:00 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Agreed completely. It’s like talking to a wall. It’s over their heads.
Posted on 4/13/19 at 5:49 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
That both men are criminals that threatened violence against a small business owner.
Ok, was that ever in dispute? Again what does that have to do with Williams qualifications to serve on the LSU BOS?
quote:
Not but their actions clearly show on film a complete disregard for authority and offers video evidence of 2 guys that have no problem strong arm robbing a convenience store so I’m just gonna go ahead and side with the officers side of the story since he never had 1 issue before the incident.
Did the officer see the video before hand? But like the other guy you are arguing with yourself no one is arguing whether they did it or not or even that the officer was in the wrong. You seem to think it is an unforgivable moral outrage for an attorney to defend criminals or sue a police dept.
quote:
Also if you’re going to make some ambiguous statement about other cases how about you provide some statistical proof or evidence. Because a jury sided with the Ferguson Police Department.
I wasn’t making an accusation and I’m not arguing about THIS SPECIFIC CASE. I was just saying that because the defendants may have been guilty and the FPD was cleared in this incident doesn’t mean there haven’t been issues in the past which is what he was implying nothing more/nothing less.
quote:
LSU is pimping it in his bio. What you do, what you stand for and your actions define who you are. You can’t brag about his qualifications and then backtrack once facts are pointed out about his past. Well, I gues you can. The far left typically do.
Strawman much
Who is backtracking? Does it say in his bio he won a case he in fact lost? If not then your statement makes no sense. What you think of his character based on that is simply your opinion and again in no way makes him unqualified for the BOS.
Posted on 4/13/19 at 5:58 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Just a friendly reminder that our University is being ran by someone who has actively sued a Police Department.
"being ran"
"actively sued"
are you sure you've got a degree from LSU?
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:12 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
The same guy that sued Ferguson Police Department, the officer and the chief of police and his reason was that the officer was terrozing the robbers when he told him to get on the sidewalk.
So you think his argument was not a good one, good for you. Didnt you say the jury siding with the FPD? So what’s the problem? If he sued and lost justice was served was it not?
quote:
What about you H-Town tiger do you agree with his stance and what he’s fighting for?
That depends on what you mean, though I really don’t know what he’s “fighting for”. In this specific case what little I know, the officer was cleared that was the right outcome. I don’t hold it against defense attorney’s for representing clients even if I disagree with the clients case.
quote:
Do you want your kids to go to a school where a Personal Injury attorney serves as the head of the board?
And you call others snowflakes
I have no idea who was on the BOS when I was in school, let alone what they did for a living
So no I don’t care if someone is an defense attorney regardless of the types of cases they try and whether I agree with their political views or argument presented in one hyper charged case serves on the BOS
This post was edited on 4/13/19 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:17 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
Agreed completely. It’s like talking to a wall. It’s over their heads.
This is irony defined right here
Sorry pal just because someone doesn’t share you view that suing a police dept, even if their clients and not the police, were at fault, is some unforgivable sin doesn’t mean we don’t understand
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
So you think his argument was not a good one, good for you.
His argument was not a good one in any respect and that a federal court denied a motion to dismiss on it is an insult to the integrity of the judiciary and our notion of applying the LAW
quote:
Didnt you say the jury siding with the FPD? So what’s the problem? If he sued and lost justice was served was it not?
Justice is never served when frivolous claims are filed and permitted to proceed past a 12b6 without just compensation, besides we're conflating the criminal trial of Wilson with the civil suit brought by Johnson
quote:
That depends on what you mean, though I really don’t know what he’s “fighting for”.
I mean it's pretty clear the dude encouraged and disseminated the "Hands Up Don't Shoot" fraud and single-handedly obliterated the police-black community relationship nationwide despite that he's an attorney with a great education and presumptively smart. I mean who with a brain would actually do this stuff to the detriment of the country man?
quote:
I don’t hold it against defense attorney’s for representing clients even if I disagree with the clients case.
No one does, the fact people think its a problem reflects badly on them I mean hey Alan Dershowitz represented OJ on the Dream Team and though I think OJ's guilty personally, Alan's a legend in the legal field and does a tremendous job separating his politics from his legal analysis plus its a Constitutional right
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:27 pm to Solo Cam
What a bunch of degenerates. One day these people will be expelled from society before they are able to affect it so negatively.
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:37 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:You asked what the video showed in that situation. I educated you. You’re welcome.
Ok, was that ever in dispute? Again what does that have to do with Williams qualifications to serve on the LSU BOS?
quote:What the frick? So now Cops have to see videos before confronting guys who just robbed a store. Literally robbed the store.
Did the officer see the video before hand? But like the other guy you are arguing with yourself no one is arguing whether they did it or not or even that the officer was in the wrong. You seem to think it is an unforgivable moral outrage for an attorney to defend criminals or sue a police dept.
Honest to god imagine this scenario:
2 big arse guys came into your house, pulled your TV off the wall, threaten you, walk outside and a cop shoots the guy for running away.
Then you hear about the cop and town being sued for terrozing a racial group.
That’s so fricking disgusting.
quote:Completely false. But I also look at that situation and see 2 criminals who disobeyed a police officer and got shot.
You seem to think it is an unforgivable moral outrage for an attorney to defend criminals or sue a police dept.
Williams looked at it and saw a paycheck so he went after a town in Missouri for the police “terrozing” the two criminals that just robbed a store. In my book that makes you a piece of shite.
Play stupid games and you win stupid prizes. If they didn’t strong arm rob that business owner then they would have never ran and never been shot.
quote:You made a reference to other incidents. That’s an ambiguous statement.
I wasn’t making an accusation and I’m not arguing about THIS SPECIFIC CASE. I was just saying that because the defendants may have been guilty and the FPD was cleared in this incident doesn’t mean there haven’t been issues in the past which is what he was implying nothing more/nothing less.
Either provide links, stories or some sort of tangible proof or kick rocks clown.
quote:It’s like talking to a retarded 4 year old. I’m not typing the same thing over and again. Obviously you struggle with reading comprehension.
Who is backtracking? Does it say in his bio he won a case he in fact lost? If not then your statement makes no sense. What you think of his character based on that is simply your opinion and again in no way makes him unqualified for the BOS.
This post was edited on 4/13/19 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 4/13/19 at 6:45 pm to Solo Cam
Solo Cam, all these leftists do, that’s why they’re losing the argument, they can’t fricking read, I wanna continue arguing and destroying them but that’s gonna detract from other stuff I wanna do so you know...
Popular
Back to top


0




