- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/2/09 at 10:07 am to Catt
quote:
Dude what school you went to?
If is helps get a calculator and punch in 1998 + 10 and you will get 2008
1998 = Season 1
1999 = Season 2
2000 = Season 3
2001 = Season 4
2002 = Season 5
2003 = Season 6
2004 = Season 7
2005 = Season 8
2006 = Season 9
2007 = Season 10
2008 = Season 11
Does this help you dumbass.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 10:22 am to Indiana Tiger
Add it up any way you want it doesn’t change the fact the USC Trojans are paper heroes just like the Oklahoma Sooners and the Ohio State Buckeyes.
Oh by the way a dumbass is any one who thinks USC can compete against the SEC.
Oh by the way a dumbass is any one who thinks USC can compete against the SEC.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 10:52 am to Catt
quote:
Add it up any way you want it doesn’t change the fact the USC Trojans are paper heroes just like the Oklahoma Sooners and the Ohio State Buckeyes.
USC is 6-1 in BCS Bowls games hoss, they have won 11 games and finished in the top 4 the last 7 years in a row, that includes, 1 BCS and 1 AP championship. They also haven't lost a game by more than 7 since 2000
Hate them all you want, but if you deny they have been a great team, you are just biased if you can't acknowledge that
quote:
Oh by the way a dumbass is any one who thinks USC can compete against the SEC.
really? why is that. Come on man, did you see LSU v Oregon State and Az State? USC is built like an SEC team, lots of speed, lots of great athletes. Anyone that doesn't see that is just biased.
Interesting that when LSU or Florida destroys Ohio State in BCS CG its because the SEC is so dominant. But when USC skull fricks big 10 teams in the Rose Bowl, its because the Big 10 sucks.
This post was edited on 8/2/09 at 11:06 am
Posted on 8/2/09 at 10:57 am to bigt41
quote:
1.florida
2.lsu
why do people think Florida is the team of the decade?
LSU has just as many BCS titles, just as many SEC titles, but more BCS bowl wins (4 to 3) and a better overall bowl record: 7-2 to 4-5.
ETA: overall records LSU 90-27, UF 87-29
Florida is not the SEC team of the decade.
This post was edited on 8/2/09 at 11:22 am
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:04 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Interesting that when LSU or Florida destroys a Ohio State in BCS CG its because the SEC is so dominant. But when USC skull fricks big 10 teams in the Rose Bowl, its because the Big 10 sucks.
True dat.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:08 am to Catt
quote:
Had they played Auburn instead of Oklahoma they would have lost period
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:26 am to Catt
quote:
If is helps get a calculator and punch in 1998 + 10 and you will get 2008
wow
quote:
Had they played Auburn instead of Oklahoma they would have lost period
You must be basing that off of Auburns dominance against USC in 2003.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:27 am to dukke v
quote:
DUMBEST STATEMENT EVER!!!!!!
considering he can't figure out that 1998-2008 is 10 years, but 11 football seasons, what do you expect.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:30 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
why do people think Florida is the team of the decade?
LSU has just as many BCS titles, just as many SEC titles, but more BCS bowl wins (4 to 3) and a better overall bowl record: 7-2 to 4-5.
Florida is not the SEC team of the decade.
While it's not correct, IMO FL gets a lot of credit based on expectations for this year. Regardless, the only purpose for having this discussion now is to show how close all of the top teams are. There is no dominant team of the aughts. If any one of the top teams and possibly even TX wins it all this year, that team will probably be bestowed the label of Team of the Decade.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:36 am to Indiana Tiger
quote:
IMO FL gets a lot of credit based on expectations for this year
I think you are right, still surprising though that LSU fans on and LSU board are conceding TOD status to Florida, when LSU's resume is better at this point.
This post was edited on 8/2/09 at 11:45 am
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:40 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
still surprising though that LSU fans on and LSU board are conceding TOD status to Florida,
Cause HOMER LSU fans HATE Saban yet include what he did in 2003!!!!
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:40 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
considering he can't figure out that 1998-2008 is 10 years, but 11 football seasons, what do you expect.
I don't know why this is so hard, but if you're actually including 1998 and 2008 as years, then it is 11 years. You do not complete 2 seasons in one calendar year.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:49 am to dukke v
quote:
Cause HOMER LSU fans HATE Saban yet include what he did in 2003!!
this makes no sense PJ. I'm surprised the LSU fans are not saying LSU is Team of the Decade over Florida, since our resume is slightly better.
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:50 am to Indiana Tiger
quote:
I don't know why this is so hard
that's because its not hard at all. Its simple math my 5 y/old niece can figure out
This post was edited on 8/2/09 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 8/2/09 at 11:59 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
I'm surprised the LSU fans are not saying LSU is Team of the Decade over Florida, since our resume is slightly better.
I don't disagree wiyh you. I think as of right now that its between LSU and USC!!!!
Posted on 8/2/09 at 12:13 pm to dukke v
this decade aint over yet suckas
Posted on 8/2/09 at 12:15 pm to iwanttokisschadjones
quote:
this decade aint over yet suckas
GOT A PROBLEM?????????
Posted on 8/2/09 at 2:36 pm to tigers
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call me Bias,
1) LSU , 1st to win 2 BCS Crystal Balls
2) UF , 2nd to win 2 BCS Crystal Balls
3) OU , for most appearances despiting losing most 1-3, not getting into if deserved in 03 lol
4) UT , for at least Beating the team thats below them
5) USC, IF HAD TO CHOOSE #5, because of their lack of conference competition facing no defense basically , and constantly playing a lousy BIG 10 conference in bowls
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your pointless response :
_________________________________________________
I call you an idiot for having USC #5. You choose UT 4 because they beat UT, but ignore the whipping USC put on Oklahoma.
Also, look at LSU's BCS bowl wins:
Illinois (USC also blew out Illinois)
Oklahoma (USC also beat them in a bowl game - another blowout)
ND - (USC pretty much blows them out every year)
Ohio State - (USC blew them out as well and has whipped Michigan 2x, Iowa 1x and Penn St. 1x).
The two crystal balls for LSU is impressive, but don't act like LSU is facing better competition in their bowl games.
_________________________________________________
facing better competition in their bowl games, get your head out of youre arse, that wasnt mentioned lol , i said conference for the condoms, therefore its their downfall to constantly play the winner of the big nothing conference as well, annually, poor choice by those 2 conferences IMO, of course thats doesnt mean anything to anybody,
lol, Hmmm well in the decade which this was attached to, Univ. of Texas beat the condoms , who were the supposedly best team on earth, so they each have 1 Crystal ball < Texas gets the nod over the busted condoms, anyhow, i dont mind being a idiot in your mind, you certainly dont hold a candle with actual light in your opinion either , anyhow, sux the condoms all you'd like im entitled to think way i do , good day )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call me Bias,
1) LSU , 1st to win 2 BCS Crystal Balls
2) UF , 2nd to win 2 BCS Crystal Balls
3) OU , for most appearances despiting losing most 1-3, not getting into if deserved in 03 lol
4) UT , for at least Beating the team thats below them
5) USC, IF HAD TO CHOOSE #5, because of their lack of conference competition facing no defense basically , and constantly playing a lousy BIG 10 conference in bowls
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your pointless response :
_________________________________________________
I call you an idiot for having USC #5. You choose UT 4 because they beat UT, but ignore the whipping USC put on Oklahoma.
Also, look at LSU's BCS bowl wins:
Illinois (USC also blew out Illinois)
Oklahoma (USC also beat them in a bowl game - another blowout)
ND - (USC pretty much blows them out every year)
Ohio State - (USC blew them out as well and has whipped Michigan 2x, Iowa 1x and Penn St. 1x).
The two crystal balls for LSU is impressive, but don't act like LSU is facing better competition in their bowl games.
_________________________________________________
facing better competition in their bowl games, get your head out of youre arse, that wasnt mentioned lol , i said conference for the condoms, therefore its their downfall to constantly play the winner of the big nothing conference as well, annually, poor choice by those 2 conferences IMO, of course thats doesnt mean anything to anybody,
lol, Hmmm well in the decade which this was attached to, Univ. of Texas beat the condoms , who were the supposedly best team on earth, so they each have 1 Crystal ball < Texas gets the nod over the busted condoms, anyhow, i dont mind being a idiot in your mind, you certainly dont hold a candle with actual light in your opinion either , anyhow, sux the condoms all you'd like im entitled to think way i do , good day )
Popular
Back to top


1





