- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coach O on the Offense:
Posted on 8/24/17 at 7:44 am to SportTiger1
Posted on 8/24/17 at 7:44 am to SportTiger1
Im sure canada uses the opposing D to determine what he will do.
0
Posted on 8/24/17 at 7:45 am to SoloTiger
quote:
i think 40/60 pass/run ratio at best.
Yea cuz this has worked out great the last few years. I'm for what ever works of course...but a vertical passing game helps the run more than anything.
This post was edited on 8/24/17 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 8/24/17 at 7:50 am to dabayoubama
A lot of "runs" in Canada's offense is the WR sweep play, which yes is a run, but in a way is almost like a screen play making the other team defend the WR o nthe edge basically. Quadree Henderson for Pitt had 60 carries last year from that play. He only had 26 receptions.
Then again, the shovel pass play to the F-back is basically a run play, but counts as a pass play.
In all, I dont give a frick what our ratio really is, just puts points on the board and move the football. If that ratio was 70/30 run/pass and we put up 42 points a game I'd take it.
Then again, the shovel pass play to the F-back is basically a run play, but counts as a pass play.
In all, I dont give a frick what our ratio really is, just puts points on the board and move the football. If that ratio was 70/30 run/pass and we put up 42 points a game I'd take it.
Posted on 8/24/17 at 8:12 am to semjase
quote:
OL is going to kill this season as far as this team reaching its full potential.
Okay two things:
1) can we put this our OL sucks myth to rest. Our OL doesn't suck. Our DEPTH at OL is very weak, but our starting crew is full of upper classmen and is a strong unit. Therefore, INJURIES to the OL would prevent this team from reaching its potential this season.
2) if our OL sucks then they wouldn't prevent us from reaching our potential our potential would by definition be lower because our OL helps define what our potential is. So please if you are going to post something baseless and ignorant at least voice it correctly.
Posted on 8/24/17 at 8:30 am to CheeseTiger251
quote:
Okay two things:
1) can we put this our OL sucks myth to rest. Our OL doesn't suck. Our DEPTH at OL is very weak, but our starting crew is full of upper classmen and is a strong unit. Therefore, INJURIES to the OL would prevent this team from reaching its potential this season.
2) if our OL sucks then they wouldn't prevent us from reaching our potential our potential would by definition be lower because our OL helps define what our potential is. So please if you are going to post something baseless and ignorant at least voice it correctly.
Great post. But that cocksucker is too fricking stupid to comprehend and/or too intellectually dishonest to acknowledge. Perhaps both.
Posted on 8/24/17 at 11:24 am to dabayoubama
I hope everybody realizes that Cananda ran the ball more last uear at Pitt that we did percentage wise. Get use to it.
Posted on 8/24/17 at 11:29 am to RedTigerRulz
quote:
Yea cuz this has worked out great the last few years. I'm for what ever ration works of course...but a vertical passing game helps the run more than anything.
Problem with LSU's offense under Miles wasn't necessarily the run/pass ratio as much as it was predictable by down and distance, personnel, and formation.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News