- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:46 am to BilJ
quote:
Because you asked nicely unlike the first prick
The video, titled "The Media is LYING! Missing Facts in the Ole Miss/LSU Coaching Saga," provides a critical analysis of the coaching transition involving Lane Kiffin, Charlie Weis Jr., and Kevin Smith as they move from Ole Miss to LSU.
The speaker argues that the national and local media are presenting a biased narrative and missing several key facts:
LSU is Funding the Ole Miss Playoff Run
• The speaker emphasizes that LSU is currently paying the salaries and benefits for coaches like Charlie Weis Jr. and Kevin Smith while they continue to coach Ole Miss in the College Football Playoff [01:23].
• LSU has allowed these coaches to stay with Ole Miss through the semifinals and potentially the championship game to avoid sabotaging the players' chances [00:51].
The "Tampering" Controversy
• The video highlights a contradiction in Ole Miss's strategy: the administration has threatened tampering allegations against the very coaches they are "begging" to stay in the building to help them win [02:47].
• The speaker views this as "biting the hand that feeds you," noting that LSU only pushed back on the tampering threats by telling Ole Miss to stop the "BS" if they wanted the coaches to remain available [10:39].
Lane Kiffin’s Departure
• The speaker defends Kiffin’s right to take a "better job," noting that while he may or may not succeed at LSU, it is a personal career decision that shouldn't be vilified by the media [03:47].
• He points out that Ole Miss's success and their presence in the semifinals are directly due to the infrastructure and program Kiffin built over the last six years [05:24].
Internal Conflicts and Hypocrisy
• The speaker notes the pettiness of the situation: Ole Miss refused to let Lane Kiffin coach the playoff games but insisted that his assistants (who are also leaving for LSU) stay to call plays and coach the running backs [03:13].
• He reveals that other coaches, like Pete Golding, also had eyes on other jobs (including LSU and Florida), suggesting that Kiffin isn't the only one looking for different opportunities [11:43].
Conclusion:
The speaker concludes that the situation is a "mess" and a "litmus test" for how the college football calendar needs to change [08:24]. He calls for more objectivity from the media and for "cooler heads to prevail" so Ole Miss can focus on trying to win a championship [11:26].
Thanks Bill however those crying that they dont have time for a 15 minute video are the same ones who will take 30 minutes to read this
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:53 am to King BRLA
This video discusses the ongoing conflict between Ole Miss and LSU regarding coaching staff changes during the college football playoffs (0:00).
The speaker argues that the media is misrepresenting the situation by omitting key facts and taking a biased approach (0:10-0:23).
Here are the main points highlighted in the video:
LSU is paying the coaches: LSU is still paying the salaries and benefits of coaches Charlie Weiss Jr. and Kevin Smith, even though they are now coaching for Ole Miss in the playoffs. The speaker believes LSU is doing the right thing by allowing them to coach through the postseason (1:15-1:37, 2:08-2:18).
Ole Miss's tampering allegations: Despite LSU paying the coaches and allowing them to assist Ole Miss, the Ole Miss administration is reportedly investigating tampering allegations against these same coaches for talking to LSU players (2:40-2:59).
The speaker finds this hypocritical and "biting the hand that feeds you" (3:02-3:04).
Lane Kiffin's decision: The speaker defends Lane Kiffin's decision to leave Ole Miss for LSU, stating that any intelligent coach would take a better job with more consistent chances of winning at a big-time level (3:42-3:56).
He criticizes the media for questioning Kiffin's choice, emphasizing that it's a personal decision (4:01-4:18).
Ole Miss's reliance on Kiffin's program: The video stresses that Ole Miss is in the playoffs because of the program, staff, and NIL infrastructure that Lane Kiffin built (5:24-5:49).
LSU's actions are admirable: The speaker believes LSU has acted admirably and done the right thing by hiring who they believe can help their program (6:09-6:34) and attempting to mitigate the negative impact on Ole Miss (6:56-6:59).
Underlying motives: The speaker suggests that both LSU and Ole Miss might have initially assumed Ole Miss would not beat Georgia, and thus the coaching situation would resolve itself quickly (7:46-7:56).
He also states that Ole Miss's actions have become "strictly personal" and are driven by feeling "jilted by Lane" (10:51-11:12).
Media's incomplete narrative: The video concludes by reiterating that the media is failing to present all the facts, specifically not mentioning LSU footing the bill and Ole Miss threatening tampering charges (12:41-13:00).
The speaker urges for cooler heads to prevail and for Ole Miss to focus on winning the championship (12:28-13:36).
Edit:Didn't realize someone else already posted the summary.
The speaker argues that the media is misrepresenting the situation by omitting key facts and taking a biased approach (0:10-0:23).
Here are the main points highlighted in the video:
LSU is paying the coaches: LSU is still paying the salaries and benefits of coaches Charlie Weiss Jr. and Kevin Smith, even though they are now coaching for Ole Miss in the playoffs. The speaker believes LSU is doing the right thing by allowing them to coach through the postseason (1:15-1:37, 2:08-2:18).
Ole Miss's tampering allegations: Despite LSU paying the coaches and allowing them to assist Ole Miss, the Ole Miss administration is reportedly investigating tampering allegations against these same coaches for talking to LSU players (2:40-2:59).
The speaker finds this hypocritical and "biting the hand that feeds you" (3:02-3:04).
Lane Kiffin's decision: The speaker defends Lane Kiffin's decision to leave Ole Miss for LSU, stating that any intelligent coach would take a better job with more consistent chances of winning at a big-time level (3:42-3:56).
He criticizes the media for questioning Kiffin's choice, emphasizing that it's a personal decision (4:01-4:18).
Ole Miss's reliance on Kiffin's program: The video stresses that Ole Miss is in the playoffs because of the program, staff, and NIL infrastructure that Lane Kiffin built (5:24-5:49).
LSU's actions are admirable: The speaker believes LSU has acted admirably and done the right thing by hiring who they believe can help their program (6:09-6:34) and attempting to mitigate the negative impact on Ole Miss (6:56-6:59).
Underlying motives: The speaker suggests that both LSU and Ole Miss might have initially assumed Ole Miss would not beat Georgia, and thus the coaching situation would resolve itself quickly (7:46-7:56).
He also states that Ole Miss's actions have become "strictly personal" and are driven by feeling "jilted by Lane" (10:51-11:12).
Media's incomplete narrative: The video concludes by reiterating that the media is failing to present all the facts, specifically not mentioning LSU footing the bill and Ole Miss threatening tampering charges (12:41-13:00).
The speaker urges for cooler heads to prevail and for Ole Miss to focus on winning the championship (12:28-13:36).
Edit:Didn't realize someone else already posted the summary.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 11:55 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News