- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Canada and LSU officially part ways
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:03 am to tke857
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:03 am to tke857
Just my opinion, but I believe they have something on Canada if he’s accepting that little. Such as missed practices, missed meetings..... things that have been documented. This agreement avoids a court fight and both sides can go about their ways.
2
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:04 am to rbdallas
quote:
one thing does not imply the other
Sure it does. Doesn’t mean it’s the case, but it certainly implies it.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:12 am to MottLaneKid
quote:ch.1 Les loves Cam
tell all book...buffoonery that is The LSU athletic department
ch.2 Les loves Jefferson
ch.3 F.King loves Les
ch.4 PR dark days
--
ch.5 Alleva settles
ch.6 Ed loves Canada
**ch.7 Ed settles?**
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:13 am to SelaTiger
They had enough that he didn't fight it. He was trying to work his way back to good graces hoping to coach one more season. He screwed this up and knows it.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:14 am to Mo Jeaux
Why would there be a need for a buyout if had not been fired?
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:58 am to dru5
quote:
RON Mexico
FIFY
He certainly would take care of the Dawgs...
Posted on 1/6/18 at 12:34 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Sure it does. Doesn’t mean it’s the case, but it certainly implies it.
not really, here is how it may go...
I am firing you and owe you $ 3mm
you say, let's come to an agreement...
You say I quit and I will take less settlement.
happens all the time.
LSU gets what it wants
Canada gets what he wants
Posted on 1/6/18 at 12:50 pm to rbdallas
I've been saying that there is something that happened that we know nothing about. How come everyone else that works with O doesn't have problems with him in year 1 ffs? Players and coaches love him. Aranda loves working with coach O. Canada seems to have problems wherever he goes and leaves quickly, after a while you have to start wondering if there's just something about the dude that can't be happy as a coordinator. Screw him, we don't need bad energy on this team or between coaches. There are plenty of gl coaches that can come in and excel with the talent we have, frick matt canada.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 12:55 pm to ImayGoLesMiles
There is one thing that is certain like death and taxes and that is there will forever never be a dull moment at the end of an LSU football season.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 1:38 pm to BeepNode
quote:
You guys, and this board are ridiculous. Sure, it's possible that some shite went down but taking a settlement is NOT an indication of improprieties. It's likely an effort to convert a restrictive buyout that is offset by future earnings into an up-front payment with no strings attached. Now Canada will be able to go find another job without having to deal with the stipulations. Canada's break-even mark will be $750k/yr in whatever future job he gets. On the flip side of that LSU reduces their potential liabilities and they come out ahead if Canada makes less than $750k/yr at the next job since they would have been on the hook for the difference.
This....Finally.... Someone knows what they’re talking about.
This post was edited on 1/6/18 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 1/6/18 at 2:03 pm to tke857
I hope no OC worth a damn accepts the job. Old Miss O is back.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 2:22 pm to tke857
If he really hires Ensminger or promotes or whatever, this program is fricked.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 4:00 pm to SelaTiger
quote:
I believe they have something on Canada if he’s accepting that little.
No. Don't be an idiot. The buyout was over a period of time, had terms and offsets in it. He likely renegotiated into a lump sum no-srings attached payment. It'd be like if you win the lottery and not only are the payments spread out over time but they are offset by your income. You'd take a lesser amount if it's a lump sum payment.
The only thing it means is that Canada wants to work and that he thinks he can land another decent paying job pretty much immediately.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 4:59 pm to dcw7g
quote:
I actually think this number makes a lot of sense for a mutual parting of ways. LSU pays it because if they don’t, they risk Canada sitting on his arse for two years and having to pay out 3 million. Canada takes it because if he doesn’t, he’s working “for free” if he takes a job in the next two years. Now he has at least a chance to make MORE than 3 million over the next couple years, he just has to beat $650k per year.
Interesting. I hadn't thought about it in that way. Good point.
Posted on 1/6/18 at 5:10 pm to TickledTiger
I love that episode and still laugh every time I see Kramer smoking and guzzling beer at the same time.
And I love the line where the guy says, "Don't take this personally, but when I come back, I'm sitting over there."
And I love the line where the guy says, "Don't take this personally, but when I come back, I'm sitting over there."
Posted on 1/6/18 at 7:00 pm to tke857
'in the run game'
sad bananna
sad bananna
Posted on 1/6/18 at 7:50 pm to tke857
I feel like we are making a huge mistake
I hope I’m wrong
I hope I’m wrong
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News