- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:31 am to Geaux5000
quote:
Dietzel and Saban have both publicly said that leaving LSU was the biggest mistake of their career. So what's your point?
You got a link where Saban said this publicly. LMAO.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:33 am to cajunbama
quote:
The only one of the "bad coaches that LSU made good" that have been head coaches after their miserable failures there was Dinardo, and he coached Indiana.
Dinardo nor Archer can be classified in your term "miserable failure", they both had success while coaching LSU, Dinardo's downfall was not getting rid of Lou Tepper as DC...
The only one that can be classified under "miserable failure" is Curly Hallman...
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:33 am to Geaux5000
quote:
You're right....Saban was the coach for that one too.
Well the previous poster that I responded to said that the ULM lose fricked our program. The point that you missed that it was similar to yall's UAB lose. I don't think you guys have been fricked since that lose have you?
This post was edited on 4/16/08 at 11:36 am
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:35 am to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Dinardo nor Archer can be classified in your term "miserable failure",
Damn, what a stubborn bunch of homers. Did LSU fire Dinardo and Archer? A yes or no will do, instead of paragraphs of revisionist history.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:37 am to cajunbama
He has said it a bunch of times. He said it at media days for one, and right before the Bama-LSU game for another.
Look up your own damn link, gump.
Look up your own damn link, gump.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:39 am to cajunbama
quote:
Damn, what a stubborn bunch of homers. Did LSU fire Dinardo and Archer? A yes or no will do, instead of paragraphs of revisionist history.
In both cases, the only winning seasons in their careers came while at LSU. And both of them did it multiple times.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:40 am to Geaux5000
quote:
Look up your own damn link, gump.
What I thought.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:40 am to cajunbama
quote:
Damn, what a stubborn bunch of homers.
And you're an uninformed idiot that has proven he doesn't know what he's talking about and has had things broken down to their simpliest explanation for you to be able to understand and you still are unable to comprehend...shouldn't expect anything less from a gump...
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:41 am to cajunbama
quote:
What I thought.
Do you not have google?
This post was edited on 4/16/08 at 11:42 am
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:42 am to Geaux5000
quote:
In both cases, the only winning seasons in their careers came while at LSU.
And they had enough losing seasons to be fired by,,,LSU. So LSU is responsible when the win according to you, but not when they lose. Got it.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:45 am to cajunbama
quote:
And they had enough losing seasons to be fired by,,,LSU. So LSU is responsible when the win according to you, but not when they lose. Got it.
We're responsible for hiring bad coaches, sure. But history has overwhelmingly shown that coaches (good or bad) have the best success of their career while at LSU. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:55 am to Geaux5000
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:55 am to cajunbama
quote:Try and follow along. Let's say a guy goes golfing every day. And for two weeks straight, he shoots over 110. Then he switches clubs, and for two weeks straight he shoots over 110. Then he switches clubs again, and for two weeks straight he shoots over 110. Then he switches clubs again, and for the next two weeks he shoots over 110 60% of the time and under 100 the other 40% of the time. Then he switches clubs again and for two weeks straight he shoots over 110.
So LSU is responsible when the win according to you, but not when they lose. Got it.
Now, with that 4th set of golf clubs, he did indeed shoot over 110. But he also shot under 100, something he never managed to do with any of the other clubs. So, when he shot over 110 with that 4th set of clubs, is it logical to assume that it was due to the clubs when he had shot over 110 every single time with every single other set of clubs he had used? Of course not. But when he did something with that set of clubs that he had never done with any other set of clubs -- shot under 100 -- is it logical to suspect that the clubs had something to do with it? Of course.
So, yes, when DiNardo -- who had a losing season every single season he coached anywhere but LSU -- had a losing season at LSU, it is not logical to assume it was due to LSU because it was no different than the results he got everywhere else. But when he did something at LSU that he never did anywhere else in his entire career -- have winning seasons -- then it is logical to suspect that the school had something to do with it.
You keep talking about how these guys were miserable failures because they got fired from LSU and couldn't get a decent job anywhere else. But what does it say to you when all these guys who couldn't even get coaching jobs anywhere else are able to post 10+ win seasons, win SEC Championships and National Coach of the Year awards when they are coaching LSU? If LSU had nothing to do with their success, then why did they happen to ONLY have success when they were at LSU?
Posted on 4/16/08 at 11:57 am to King Joey
that analogy is way too complicated for an Alabama fan to comprehend.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 12:02 pm to King Joey
You're going to make his one last remaining cell implode...
also his link he asked for about Saban regretting leaving is now posted...
quote:
You got a link where Saban said this publicly. LMAO.
also his link he asked for about Saban regretting leaving is now posted...
Posted on 4/16/08 at 12:16 pm to cajunbama
quote:
its like losing to UAB.
Nope. Nowhere close. UAB in 2000 was 7-4. Of their four losses, one was on a last-play FG at Kansas, another was in overtime against USM. They were literally right on the brink of a 9-2 season despite playing road games against at least two BCS league schools. ULM in 2007 was nowhere near that level.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 12:29 pm to King Joey
quote:
Y'all have bet $32 million that it was the coach THIS time. That's why y'all are gumps.
Too good.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 2:01 pm to cajunbama
quote:cajunbama, nothing he posted revised history in any way. he posted irrefutable facts; records of coaches with lsu and elsewhere.
paragraphs of revisionist history.
Posted on 4/16/08 at 2:04 pm to cajunbama
quote:pal, regardless of who fired them, the coach had more success at lsu than anywhere else. including satan. it's just not as complicated as you are making it out to be.
And they had enough losing seasons to be fired by,,,LSU. So LSU is responsible when the win according to you, but not when they lose. Got it.
Page 17 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News