- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any word on WR depth chart next year if chark, chi leave?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:39 pm to helllo_heisman002
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:39 pm to helllo_heisman002
I still think Donte Jackson would be a beast on offense.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:46 pm to helllo_heisman002
I think Derrick Dillon is going to surprise a bunch of people next year.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:48 pm to helllo_heisman002
quote:
Any word on WR depth chart next year if chark, chi leave?
A - not happening, 55% chance Dupre stays and 85% chance Chark stays IMO
B - we have and will continue to have more talented receivers than we know what to do with, the success of Jarvis and Odell in the NFL will ensure that for the next 5-10 years...relax
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:49 pm to helllo_heisman002
WR depth chart least of our worries, brah.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:41 pm to helllo_heisman002
I'm assuming Chi is Malichi D?? Is there any reason why you can't give a little more than those 3 letters?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:24 pm to helllo_heisman002
Chark said on his instagram live account yesterday that he was staying FWIW
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:41 pm to LSUStar
quote:
Why did Ferguson leave?
Don't think he had a choice
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:23 pm to Ollie Cherpussie
Oeaux Canada!!!!
It will be epic next season.
Think Aranda but with the offensive genius mindset.
It will be epic next season.
Think Aranda but with the offensive genius mindset.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:30 pm to ronk
quote:
I'm pretty sure Danny Etling knows who his receivers are, tard
You're just kidding right? Please tell me you're trolling with that comment. If you're serious, I have no words
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:56 pm to south bama tiger
[quote]I don't want to live in a world where Russell Gage is the #1 receiver on our depth chart.[/quote
It's not likely he would get to number one without a lot of injuries in front of him, but what exactly do you have against him? He did something to earn his playing time, and looked good when he was in. Did he piss in your Cheerios or something?
It's not likely he would get to number one without a lot of injuries in front of him, but what exactly do you have against him? He did something to earn his playing time, and looked good when he was in. Did he piss in your Cheerios or something?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 7:40 pm to CAT
quote:
But if both go then you have
Gage
D Anderson
Drake Davis
Dillon
Sullivan
Guidry
Netherly
Idk if that is the order in which you're rating them, but I had a former NFL WR tell me last month when Guidry re-committed that he is as good as Dupree right now!
Posted on 1/5/17 at 10:13 pm to helllo_heisman002
Anderson, Davis and Sullivan can pick up the slack.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 10:18 pm to Ollie Cherpussie
quote:
Chark said on his instagram live account yesterday that he was staying FWIW
Absolutely huge! best receiver on the team and its not close.
Posted on 1/6/17 at 2:19 am to Big Sway
quote:
Oeaux
Not a word idiot

Posted on 1/6/17 at 3:51 am to helllo_heisman002
WR depth will be fine
Posted on 1/6/17 at 4:55 am to south bama tiger
quote:
I don't want to live in a world where Russell Gage is the #1 receiver on our depth chart.
If Russell Gage has a game like he did against Texas A&M every week I'd take it in a heartbeat. He had 5 catches for over a 15 yd per catch average and a touchdown catch that was highlight reel material.
Posted on 1/6/17 at 5:13 am to nicholastiger
Because he fast mane....that is the only reason...you guys I swear....he goes down with a strong breeze, is not physical at all, and is a huge turnover risk because of the reasons mentioned.
Popular
Back to top
