- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Am I the only one who finds it strange that they took JJ's DNA...
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:27 am to CamdenTiger
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:27 am to CamdenTiger
Key to the whole thing is what exactly did they swab for DNA? Maybe they found one of Andrew's hairs on JJ's shoe from the kick. To many things us, as the general public, don't know that the investigators do know to make any judgments or to be critical about how it was handled
1
Posted on 8/28/11 at 2:41 am to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
Maybe they found one of Andrew's hairs on JJ's shoe from the kick.
Good luck trying to prove when and how that hair got on JJ's shoe since the hair could have been picked up by JJ just walking in the same area Andrew walked in.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 2:51 am to MichiganTiger
i have no issue with it given the situation. it was an unusual situation and timing, so therefore an unusual call for dna collection. They had contradictory evidence and it was there only differentiating way to corroborate the story one way of another. S
This post was edited on 8/28/11 at 2:52 am
Posted on 8/28/11 at 3:10 am to therocketscientist
Like I said, there's no way they got a response on a DNA test that quick.
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News