- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:33 pm to CantonTiger128
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:34 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
No it wasn't. It was 45th last year.
Over the same period, we were at 65 with 26.5 ppg.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:40 pm to ZTiger87
hey that is pretty darn impressive.....we actually beat three teams in the SEC and finished 9th last year.
I saw the stats earlier today as 70th....so i'm not sure (knowing your agenda) that you have not somehow fixed this.....hard to believe 29 points per game would land someone 45th inthe country.
Also, given that LSU improved dramatically over the last half of the season last year (which is when Lee started playing more) I think it's only fitting we improve this year right? lol....we only play one quality D........WK=ULM....Ole Miss = Ole Miss, Arky 2011 D < Arky 2010 D, Tenn D not that good.....florida will get worn down.....I wonder how much the offense will improve over the second half this year...?
YOu think they can maintain this 38 ppg average? I bet you do don't you?
Do you like JL's performance to date?
Does your last name start with a J?
I saw the stats earlier today as 70th....so i'm not sure (knowing your agenda) that you have not somehow fixed this.....hard to believe 29 points per game would land someone 45th inthe country.
Also, given that LSU improved dramatically over the last half of the season last year (which is when Lee started playing more) I think it's only fitting we improve this year right? lol....we only play one quality D........WK=ULM....Ole Miss = Ole Miss, Arky 2011 D < Arky 2010 D, Tenn D not that good.....florida will get worn down.....I wonder how much the offense will improve over the second half this year...?
YOu think they can maintain this 38 ppg average? I bet you do don't you?
Do you like JL's performance to date?
Does your last name start with a J?
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:41 pm to GRTiger
you can't compare same period...that would not be fair.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:43 pm to TheDoc
quote:
total yards are irrelevant
how do you not understand that?
SCORING offense ranked 19th
^ that is what matters
FWIW, it was 70th last season will JJ at the helm the majority of the time
thread should have ended right here
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:44 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
you can't compare same period...that would not be fair.
Sarcasm? If no, then why is it not fair?
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:48 pm to DBG
quote:
thread should have ended right here
Because he posted a false stat?
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:49 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
CantonTiger128
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 3:59 pm to ZTiger87
Surprise stat comparing the two offenses.
I looked at drives greater than 50 yards thru first 5 games.
2010-11
2011-17
Amazingly better.
So, where are all the yards going? We don't always start on a short field or we could not have that many long drives, we are not taking many negative plays. Seems we would have more yardage.
I looked at drives greater than 50 yards thru first 5 games.
2010-11
2011-17
Amazingly better.
So, where are all the yards going? We don't always start on a short field or we could not have that many long drives, we are not taking many negative plays. Seems we would have more yardage.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:00 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Because he posted a false stat?
It wasn't 45 after 5 games in 2010
Right now, lsu is 19th through 5 games.
Marked improvement wouldn't you say?
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:00 pm to tigerfoot
So what is the reason?
I still don't think one QB is THAT much better than the other. I know we have been converting third downs like crazy.
Maybe Stud is pretty good?
I still don't think one QB is THAT much better than the other. I know we have been converting third downs like crazy.
Maybe Stud is pretty good?
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:01 pm to DBG
quote:
thread should have ended right here
70th through 5 games in 2010
19th through 5 games in 2011
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:02 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Because he posted a false stat?
nope
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:10 pm to TheDoc
quote:
70th through 5 games in 2010
19th through 5 games in 2011
It looks good right now, yes. But 19 and 28 vs. SEC teams isn't all that encouraging.
Also, 5 game samples are what they are. I could pick out 5 games from JJ last year where we surely outdid what we've done this year.
ETA: I have to offer this as a disclaimer before you, Icansee4miles and Roger continue to mislabel me... "I hope Lee keeps it up and we stay a top 20 scoring offense."
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:11 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I could pick out 5 games from JJ last year where we surely outdid what we've done this year.
well, have at it...
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:12 pm to TheDoc
quote:
SCORING offense ranked 19th ^ that is what matters FWIW, it was 70th last season will JJ at the helm the majority of the time
It was 45th last year.
While I agree with the importance of the scoring offense, it is interesting to see that total offense (90th in 2011) and passing offense (101 after 5 games) is no longer of value in the minds of some after those stats where continually whined and moaned over by some alllllllllll last season.
Go figure........
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:13 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Also, 5 game samples are what they are. I could pick out 5 games from JJ last year where we surely outdid what we've done this year.
It's a fair comparison if the same period is used. And criticizing the sample size without considering the size of the population is flawed logic.
Although I would be interested to see the comparison if you take the five highest performing regular season games from last year.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:14 pm to OBUDan
The first five are as arbitrary as any, and this year a pretty good sample given we have played a little tougher opening five.
After looking at a lot of stuff since I posted, mostly the drives over 50, I really think we are a bit better than I thought.
I really can't figure out why we are so low in yardage.
After looking at a lot of stuff since I posted, mostly the drives over 50, I really think we are a bit better than I thought.
I really can't figure out why we are so low in yardage.
Popular
Back to top


1




