- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU now has 13 three stars commits
Posted on 6/27/17 at 3:34 am to Cadello
Posted on 6/27/17 at 3:34 am to Cadello
I don't understand the anger with which some posters are denying these 3 stars will get bumps. They have another season yet to play. If half of those kids get another star, and we end up with 1 or 2 fives, will people still bitch?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 9:08 am to arkytiger23
If you know football then those "STARS" don't matter
Posted on 6/27/17 at 9:15 am to Shiftyplus1
You are making assumptions based off an uncertain future. They are stating the current reality.
It's just two very different schools of thought.
It's just two very different schools of thought.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 9:20 am to lynxcat
And that current reality is making assumptions off an uncertain future.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 9:44 am to arkytiger23
You know you can change up/down votes on here. Just refresh the page and hit your vote again. They put them too close together.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 10:35 am to lynxcat
They are free to melt over something that is unnecessary to melt over.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 10:43 am to LSU Patrick
quote:I understand some people's concern. I do not share it, but understand it. I'm thinking much of it stems from it is different than in the past and human nature is to assume change results in something negative not positive. It's well known in the marketing world that people fear to "lose something" more than "not gaining something"; hence a risk adverse mentality.
They are free to melt over something that is unnecessary to melt over.
Melting however is a different story. That I don't get. It's based on a snapshot in time without factoring in future changes such as ranking bumps (mentioned many times over here) but also new/different long term strategies, what is available talent wise compared to the past (mentioned here several times; LA is "down" this year), how verbals will be handled now as compared to the past (will there be "processing"?), and last but not least has the early signing period changed the approach (maybe Staff is going to use early 3* verbals to leverage the 4*/5* not to hold out).
So to dismiss all those variables AND use only a snapshot AND a snapshot in June AND to only compare to "what it usually is" is, to me, obviously a melt and melt only and not a valid position. It's bitching for the sake of bitching.
Popular
Back to top


1






