0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU has topped out in its Easton Royal bid- won’t go higher.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:52 pm to GeauxbiWan
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:52 pm to GeauxbiWan
What is your point here? Either ole miss is more talented then us or they beat us with less talent. Neither of these options look good for lsu
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:53 pm to GeauxbiWan
If he was all sec he would be starting… he’s seen snaps in 2 games. I’ll take two of what your smoking
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:56 pm to GeauxbiWan
Maybe I’m misunderstanding you but are you trying to say that Lane Kiffen is giving the majority (by a large margin) to a lesser player?
Posted on 10/16/26 at 6:06 pm to Covingtontiger77
Let hIm walk.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 10:25 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Legree from Oregon State
I mean... for one thing, Legree will be the single most expensive, most hotly contested non-qb portal recruitment ever, so it's not exactly as easy as just saying "oh yeah pencil him in; no biggie about losing easton royal".
And for a couple other things: (1) right now, none of our top 3 WRs by yards this season (harris/watkins/wilson) appear particularly likely to declare for the draft, so it's fairly likely they're all back next year (plus cory barber entering year 2); (2) the issue with our WR room isn't really the talent itself so much as the fact that the talent is redundant - all our best receivers are smaller, speed-oriented guys - and Legree happens to be in that exact same mold.
So, for one: Even if we target Legree, it's far from a guarantee that we land him. And for two: There are good reasons why we might not even target him, and would prefer to spend our money elsewhere.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:07 am to LifeAquatic
quote:
mean... for one thing, Legree will be the single most expensive, most hotly contested non-qb portal recruitment ever, so it's not exactly as easy as just saying "oh yeah pencil him in; no biggie about losing easton royal". And for a couple other things: (1) right now, none of our top 3 WRs by yards this season (harris/watkins/wilson) appear particularly likely to declare for the draft, so it's fairly likely they're all back next year (plus cory barber entering year 2); (2) the issue with our WR room isn't really the talent itself so much as the fact that the talent is redundant - all our best receivers are smaller, speed-oriented guys - and Legree happens to be in that exact same mold. So, for one: Even if we target Legree, it's far from a guarantee that we land him. And for two: There are good reasons why we might not even target him, and would prefer to spend our money elsewhere.
Exactly. We can’t afford Royal and people think we can afford the best freshman in the country?
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:46 am to Balsamic_duck
quote:
Exactly. We can’t afford Royal and people think we can afford the best freshman in the country?
Nothing to do with “afford” and everything to do with what Glasscock values him at.
Could Texas not “afford” Royal either?
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:04 pm to Geauxldilocks
Who come up with this stuff,CANT AFFORD HIM.How about not paying a HIGH SCHOOL player that much and get a experienced player who has proven he’s great.
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News