Started By
Message

re: Has LSU dropped the Redemptorist RB charged with rape?

Posted on 1/21/11 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by tigerguy121
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
10695 posts
Posted on 1/21/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

e court of law is not going to ruin this kid for the rest of his life if he didnt physically force that girl.


Yeah do me a favor and don't quote me in ur responses I don't want people to associate us together
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62021 posts
Posted on 1/21/11 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

He got a blow job from a 14 year old and he is 18. The only question is if it was forced ( which he hasn't been charged with as of yet). If it wasn't forced, jail time would be a travesty.



I totally disagree. There are many reasons why he should be punished.

The obvious reasons are that she is only 14 years old. She's not old enough to consent. He's 18. That's pretty cut and dry and on its own, it's bad enough to be punished.

But, if you want to evaluate further, it gets worse. You keep trying to minimize the situation and equate it to a guy dating a freshman who gave him a blowjob.

The real facts are that this was a case between a young girl and TWO GUYS. That very much aggravates the situation and indicates that this is not a "normal" situation.

Furthermore, it was done in the locker room at school. Again, not an act that occurs under normal circumstances.

Plus, Jeremy Hill is the big man on campus. He's not a geek who dates a freshman because he can't get a date. The freshman is likely involved because she is easy to manipulate.

And, finally, not only did he engage in sexual activity with a 14 year old, but apparently he taped it as well.

So, it is a situation where he convinced a young girl to perform oral sex on two guys at once, one being the most popular in school, at school, in the boys locker room, while being video taped.

I'd say this is exactly the type of situation that the laws we are talking about are meant to protect against.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
22012 posts
Posted on 1/21/11 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

So before a young man's life is completely ruined


Well, no one forced him to accept the blow job, did they? Couldn't he have just said 'no'?? It's not ok to turn down a BJ from some slut?? Maybe Hill was thinking with the wrong head and deserves whatever punishment the law will give him!
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 8:15 am to
quote:



I'd say this is exactly the type of situation that the laws we are talking about are meant to protect against.


It certainly is but if I remember correctly from reading the statute yesterday, jail time isn't mandatory for this particular charge against him.

Furthermore, let's not play like the girl is necessarily a victim. She did go into a locker room, apparently willingly, and blow two guys. If I were her parents she'd be the one facing a LONNNNNG punishment.

quote:


Furthermore, it was done in the locker room at school. Again, not an act that occurs under normal circumstances.


Something that is punishable by the high school and not the courts.

quote:

The real facts are that this was a case between a young girl and TWO GUYS. That very much aggravates the situation and indicates that this is not a "normal" situation.


You and I know that high school girls will do some crazy shite to get noticed.

All I mean is, to say this guy should go to prison if he didn't force her physically or verbally is crazy to me. You will literally ensure this guy never becomes anything in life when he has a pretty promising future. I don't see this as necessary when there are forms of punishment that will suffice.
This post was edited on 1/22/11 at 8:16 am
Posted by Interception
Member since Nov 2008
11089 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 9:53 am to
Either way it's a given Jeremy Hill will not be given be coming to LSU, unless for some reason the girl retracts starments. It's really not a big loss considering the horses in the stable. Collins is who is important in this class. It's amazing how many lawyers, preachers, and ethical fathers we have on this thread.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 9:54 am to
half the people talking about the legal aspect really have zero clue about what they are talking about and they could easily read the law if they wanted to take the time to form an educated opinion.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62021 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:

All I mean is, to say this guy should go to prison if he didn't force her physically or verbally is crazy to me. You will literally ensure this guy never becomes anything in life when he has a pretty promising future. I don't see this as necessary when there are forms of punishment that will suffice.



I think it's crazy to consider the welfare of the criminal over the welfare of the victim. A 14 year old who does something for attention, is still a victim if she is manipulated (not forcibly) into performing a sexual act on two guys who have identified her need for attention.

Having said that, the best thing for Jeremy Hill is to face stiff punishment for this. He should go to jail and pay the consequences so that he understands exactly how wrong his actions were. I have no faith that he already understands that. Hell, there are plenty of people like yourself who don't understand it.


Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Hell, there are plenty of people like yourself who don't understand it.


I clearly understand that what he did was both stupid and wrong. That said, by sending him to prison you're ensuring another person slips through the cracks and will be a drain on society when he can face a different punishment that will still give him a chance at life so you and I don't have to pay for him to live on welfare for the rest of his life. I love the personal dig though against someone who doesn't agree with your disposition on the subject.
This post was edited on 1/22/11 at 10:14 am
Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10842 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 11:14 am to
Just the good ol' boys
Never meaning no harm
Beats all you ever saw, been in trouble with the law
Since the day they was born
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:06 pm to
VERY LONG. Part 1 BTW all of this is public information.
(24)(a) "Sex offense" means deferred adjudication, adjudication withheld, or conviction for the perpetration or attempted perpetration of or conspiracy to commit human trafficking when prosecuted under the provisions of R.S. 14:46.2(B)(2) or (3), R.S. 14:46.3 (trafficking of children for sexual purposes), R.S. 14:78 (incest), R.S. 14:78.1 (aggravated incest), R.S. 14:89 (crime against nature), R.S. 14:89.1 (aggravated crime against nature), R.S. 14:80 (felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile), R.S. 14:81 (indecent behavior with juveniles), R.S.14:81.1 (pornography involving juveniles), R.S. 14:81.2 (molestation of a juvenile), R.S. 14:81.3 (computer-aided solicitation of a minor), R.S. 14:81.4 (prohibited sexual conduct between an educator and student), R.S. 14:92(A)(7) (contributing to the delinquency of juveniles), R.S. 14:93.5 (sexual battery of the infirm), R.S. 14:106(A)(5) (obscenity by solicitation of a person under the age of seventeen), R.S. 14:283 (video voyeurism), R.S. 14:41 (rape), R.S. 14:42 (aggravated rape), R.S. 14:42.1 (forcible rape), R.S. 14:43 (simple rape), R.S. 14:43.1 (sexual battery), R.S. 14:43.2 (second degree sexual battery), R.S. 14:43.3 (oral sexual battery), R.S. 14:43.5 (intentional exposure to AIDS virus), or a second or subsequent conviction of R.S. 14:283.1 (voyeurism), committed on or after June 18, 1992, or committed prior to June 18, 1992, if the person, as a result of the offense, is under the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections on or after June 18, 1992. A conviction for any offense provided in this definition includes a conviction for the offense under the laws of another state, or military, territorial, foreign, tribal, or federal law which is equivalent to an offense provided for in this Chapter, unless the tribal court or foreign conviction was not obtained with sufficient safeguards for fundamental fairness and due process for the accused as provided by the federal guidelines adopted pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.
(b) For purposes of this Chapter, "sex offense" shall include deferred adjudication, adjudication withheld, or conviction for the perpetration or attempted perpetration of or conspiracy to commit aggravated oral sexual battery (formerly R.S. 14:43.4, Repealed by Acts 2001, No. 301, §2) occurring prior to August 15, 2001.
(25) "Sexual offense against a victim who is a minor" means a conviction for the perpetration or attempted perpetration of, or conspiracy to commit, any of the following:
(a) Sexual battery (R.S. 14:43.1) when the victim is under the age of eighteen, except when prosecuted under the provisions of R.S. 14:43.1(C)(2).
(b) Oral sexual battery (R.S. 14:43.3).(c) Human trafficking when prosecuted under the provisions of R.S. 14:46.2(B)(3).
(d) Aggravated incest (R.S. 14:78.1) under the circumstances not listed as those which constitute an "aggravated offense" as defined in this Section.
(e) Pornography involving juveniles (R.S. 14:81.1).
(f) Molestation of a juvenile (R.S. 14:81.2), except when prosecuted under the provisions of R.S. 14:81.2(E)(1).
(g) Computer-aided solicitation of a minor (R.S. 14:81.3).
(h) Prostitution; persons under seventeen (R.S. 14:82.1).
(i) Enticing minors into prostitution (R.S. 14:86).
(j) Pandering in violation of R.S. 14:84(1), (3), (5), and (6).
(k) Aggravated crime against nature (R.S. 14:89.1).
(l) Any conviction for an offense under the laws of another state, or military, territorial, foreign, tribal, or federal law which is equivalent to the offenses listed in Subparagraphs (a) through (k) of this Paragraph.

§43.3. Oral sexual battery
A. Oral sexual battery is the intentional engaging in any of the following acts with another person, who is not the spouse of the offender when the other person has not yet attained fifteen years of age and is at least three years younger than the offender:
(1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender; or
(2) The touching of the anus or genitals of the offender by the victim using the mouth or tongue of the victim.
B. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.
C.(1) Whoever commits the crime of oral sexual battery shall be punished by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, for not more than ten years.
(2) Whoever commits the crime of oral sexual battery on a victim under the age of thirteen years when the offender is seventeen years of age or older shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than twenty-five years nor more than ninety-nine years. At least twenty-five years of the sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
(3) Upon completion of the term of imprisonment imposed in accordance with Paragraph (2) of this Subsection, the offender shall be monitored by the Department of Public Safety and Corrections through the use of electronic monitoring equipment for the remainder of his natural life.
(4) Unless it is determined by the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, pursuant to rules adopted in accordance with the provisions of this Subsection, that a sexual offender is unable to pay all or any portion of such costs, each sexual offender to be electronically monitored shall pay the cost of such monitoring.
(5) The costs attributable to the electronic monitoring of an offender who has been determined unable to pay shall be borne by the department if, and only to the degree that sufficient funds are made available for such purpose whether by appropriation of state funds or from any other source.
(6) The Department of Public Safety and Corrections shall develop, adopt, and promulgate rules in the manner provided in the Administrative Procedure Act, that provide for the payment of such costs. Such rules shall contain specific guidelines which shall be used to determine the ability of the offender to pay the required costs and shall establish the reasonable costs to be charged. Such rules may provide for a sliding scale of payment so that an offender who is able to pay a portion, but not all, of such costs may be required to pay such portion.
Acts 1985, No. 287, §1; Acts 1995, No. 946, §2; Acts 2001, No. 301, §1; Acts 2006, No. 103, §1; Acts 2008, No. 33, §1.

Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:06 pm to
Part 2
Art. 571.1. Time limitation for certain sex offenses
Except as provided by Article 572 of this Chapter, the time within which to institute prosecution of the following sex offenses: sexual battery (R.S. 14:43.1), second degree sexual battery (R.S. 14:43.2), oral sexual battery (R.S. 14:43.3), felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile (R.S. 14:80), indecent behavior with juveniles (R.S. 14:81), molestation of a juvenile (R.S. 14:81.2), crime against nature (R.S. 14:89), aggravated crime against nature (R.S. 14:89.1), incest (R.S. 14:78), or aggravated incest (R.S. 14:78.1) which involves a victim under seventeen years of age, regardless of whether the crime involves force, serious physical injury, death, or is punishable by imprisonment at hard labor shall be thirty years. This thirty-year period begins to run when the victim attains the age of eighteen.
Acts 1993, No. 592, §1, eff. June 15, 1993; Acts 2001, No. 207, §1; Acts 2001, No. 533, §1; Acts 2003, No. 809, §1, eff. July 1, 2003; Acts 2004, No. 676, §3; Acts 2005, No. 186, §1.


8. Aggravated Rape:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted aggravated rape.
Guilty of forcible rape.
Guilty of attempted forcible rape.
Guilty of sexual battery.
Guilty of simple rape.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Guilty of oral sexual battery.
Not guilty.
8.1. Aggravated rape of a child under the age of thirteen:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted aggravated rape.
Guilty of forcible rape.
Guilty of attempted forcible rape.
Guilty of simple rape.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Guilty of sexual battery.
Guilty of molestation of a juvenile.
Guilty of attempted molestation of a juvenile.
Guilty of indecent behavior with a juvenile.
Guilty of attempted indecent behavior with a juvenile.
Not guilty.
9. Attempted Aggravated Rape:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted forcible rape.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Not guilty.
10. Forcible Rape:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted forcible rape.
Guilty of simple rape.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Guilty of sexual battery.
Not guilty.
11. Attempted Forcible Rape:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Not guilty.
12. Simple Rape:
Guilty.
Guilty of attempted simple rape.
Guilty of sexual battery.
Not guilty.
13. Attempted Simple Rape:
Guilty.
Not guilty.

This is why it is probably not carnal knowledge with a Juvenile (the age difference is >4 years since he is likely closer to 19 from what I understand.)
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:11 pm to
Part 3
If the difference in age is >4 years, then Carnal Knowledge doesn't app;y from how I read this. Meaning that the only charge for him was OSB.
Had carnal knowledge applied, then he would've had a misdeamnor provided he didn't have any sort of record.
Additionally, this is exactly why he needed to graduate last year when he was suppose to...

PART V. OFFENSES AFFECTING THE PUBLIC MORALS
SUBPART A. OFFENSES AFFECTING SEXUAL IMMORALITY
1. SEXUAL OFFENSES AFFECTING MINORS
§80. Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile
A. Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile is committed when:
(1) A person who is seventeen years of age or older has sexual intercourse, with consent, with a person who is thirteen years of age or older but less than seventeen years of age, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender and when the difference between the age of the victim and the age of the offender is four years or greater; or
(2) A person commits a second or subsequent offense of misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile, or a person who has been convicted one or more times of violating one or more crimes for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender under R.S. 15:542 commits a first offense of misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile.
B. As used in this Section, "sexual intercourse" means anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse.
C. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile's age shall not be a defense. Emission is not necessary, and penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime.
D.(1) Whoever commits the crime of felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than ten years, or both, provided that the defendant shall not be eligible to have his conviction set aside or his prosecution dismissed in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure Article 893.
(2)(a) In addition, the court shall order that the personal property used in the commission of the offense shall be seized and impounded, and after conviction, sold at public sale or public auction by the district attorney in accordance with R.S. 15:539.1.
(b) The personal property made subject to seizure and sale pursuant to Subparagraph (a) of this Paragraph may include, but shall not be limited to, electronic communication devices, computers, computer related equipment, motor vehicles, photographic equipment used to record or create still or moving visual images of the victim that are recorded on paper, film, video tape, disc, or any other type of digital recording media.
Amended by Acts 1977, No. 539, §1; Acts 1978, No. 757, §1; Acts 1990, No. 590, §1; Acts 1995, No. 241, §1; Acts 2001, No. 796, §1; Acts 2006, No. 80, §1; Acts 2008, No. 331, §1; Acts 2010, No. 763, §1.

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62021 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I clearly understand that what he did was both stupid and wrong. ... I love the personal dig though against someone who doesn't agree with your disposition on the subject.



Personal Dig? I said you don't understand how wrong what he did was.

These are YOUR posts in THIS THREAD...


quote:

he got blown by a girl in his HS. Bum rap IMO


quote:

So then it comes down to the fact that he got a BJ from some skank. Who gives a frick if she wasn't forced? They are schoolmates in the same social circles...



quote:

fact. its also the problem with the statute.



quote:

He maybe should not get his scholarship but if he ends up in jail then a travesty will have occurred


quote:

I think jail is kind of a harsh penalty for getting a blow job


quote:

Furthermore, let's not play like the girl is necessarily a victim. She did go into a locker room, apparently willingly, and blow two guys.


quote:

You and I know that high school girls will do some crazy shite to get noticed.


quote:

All I mean is, to say this guy should go to prison if he didn't force her physically or verbally is crazy to me.



So, in this very thread, you
a.) equated this situation to a simple blow job
b.) called the victim a skank
c.) declared it ok since they are schoolmates in the "same social circles" (which is in itself a bit crazy)
d.) blamed the law as being the problem
e.) declared it a travesty if he ends up with any jail time
f.) indicated that the 14 year old child is not a victim
g.) blamed the situation on her for being a high school girl who is willing to do crazy shite to get notices.
h.) finished it off by calling jail time for Jeremy Hill crazy.

Based on your own words, I'm 100% confident that you do not recognize how wrong Jeremy Hill's actions were.

Furthermore, your rehabilitation stance is ridiculous. A little bit of jail time won't necessarily destroy Jeremy Hill. I don't accept your assumption that Jeremy Hill will be a waste and on welfare if he gets some jail time on this. But, while I certainly won't enjoy spending my taxmoney on a waste as you describe, I damn well would prefer it over letting someone guilty of a sexual crime against a 14 year old walk free without punishment and running the risk of having it happen again.

You may not like this, but your stance on this subject says A LOT about the type of person you are.
This post was edited on 1/22/11 at 12:15 pm
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40882 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:15 pm to
when i was a senior stuff like this went down ALL the TIME
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62021 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

when i was a senior stuff like this went down ALL the TIME



give an example
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

You may not like this, but your stance on this subject says A LOT about the type of person you are.

It only takes a little while to do some reading. Talk to a rape victim or one the willingly went and later denied it or one that was too young and dumb, as he claims Hill was, to know any better, but as she grew up she realized how wrong it was. Girls like that will usually have some serious emotional issues to deal with later in life.
I suggest he volunteers at a women's shelter and see what it is really like. Listen to their stories... Put himself in the position of being a protector to women. Ask his mom how she would have felt or his sister.
I am not blaming this guy for his age and not knowing any better... Just suggesting to get informed...
Now we know why so many rapes go unreported...
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:25 pm to
when i was a senior stuff like this went down ALL the TIME
were you 19 or nearly 19 and a year behind in school?
Were the girls 14?
Stuff went down when I was in school as well, BUT it didn't mean it was right.
Hell we smoked weed on the bus in the afternoons home from school!
Screwed in the dugout, etc.
NONE of that was right and if we got caught we KNEW the consequences.
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

jail time isn't mandatory for this particular charge against him.

this is incorrect.
Posted by sabanisarustedspoke
Member since Jan 2007
5658 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

I clearly understand that what he did was both stupid and wrong. That said, by sending him to prison you're ensuring another person slips through the cracks and will be a drain on society when he can face a different punishment that will still give him a chance at life so you and I don't have to pay for him to live on welfare for the rest of his life. I love the personal dig though against someone who doesn't agree with your disposition on the subject.







This seems to be a clear difference in principles. You seem to think jail is for rehabilitation and I see it as retributution.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465981 posts
Posted on 1/22/11 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

The real facts are that this was a case between a young girl and TWO GUYS. That very much aggravates the situation and indicates that this is not a "normal" situation.

if a girl blew 2 guys in a locker room it just shows she's whorish and makes it less serious on hill's end

quote:

I'd say this is exactly the type of situation that the laws we are talking about are meant to protect against.

she's 14 and willingly blew 2 guys. she deserves no protection in this regard
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram