- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Claiborne - Bumped to 3 Stars on Scout
Posted on 11/13/08 at 7:56 am
Posted on 11/13/08 at 7:56 am
Geaux Tigers...His process reminds me of the Desire Street kids, especialy Lavar Edwards...Also, Alex Hurst...
This post was edited on 11/13/08 at 7:58 am
Posted on 11/13/08 at 7:59 am to NC2007
This kid has some potential. Looking forward to seeing how he contributes. 
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:01 am to Brageous
Does that make him 3 or 300 times better than he was yesterday?
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:02 am to tehmidget
Or maybe number of stars a player has increases his talent exponentially.
This class is looking up!!!
This class is looking up!!!
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:03 am to NC2007
did the teams who have offered him change as well?
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:07 am to tehmidget
In some rantards eyes, I would have to say yes...Rantards love stars...And while we are on the subject of recruits...The recruitment of CM is strange...Why did Texas just offer and why OU has not offered this kid? Just strange for some reason or another...
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
did the teams who have offered him change as well?
has other teams seen his films?
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:30 am to Prominentwon
If you are lucky you do
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
did the teams who have offered him change as well?
Why do you use this as a reason not to offer the kid, then turn around and say we should be offering Michael who's offer list is ver similar?
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:38 am to Cash
it would be a non-issue if Michael didn't have that extra little star next to his name.
Some may not realize, that Michael Ford is just .1 points away from having that purty little star next to his name. He's a 6.0 while Michael is a 6.1. Big fricking whoop.
Some may not realize, that Michael Ford is just .1 points away from having that purty little star next to his name. He's a 6.0 while Michael is a 6.1. Big fricking whoop.
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:51 am to NC2007
quote:
In some rantards eyes, I would have to say yes...Rantards love stars...
jessica Simpson or Cassiopeia?
But seriously, I dont think im too much of a tard and im full blown star gazer.
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:52 am to Cash
quote:
Why do you use this as a reason not to offer the kid, then turn around and say we should be offering Michael who's offer list is ver similar?
Because sloflo does not belong on any recruiting board. He doesn't understand any of it.
Posted on 11/13/08 at 8:58 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
dont think im too much of a turd
fixed it for you, and yes, you are.
Posted on 11/13/08 at 9:00 am to NC2007
Stars=publicity for the program.. Thus future players being recruited look at who is doing what..
This in part is why the same programs in this decade remain the same names year in and year out at the top 15..
fun for fans, and sets an expectation to a degree, of what is to come if the players stay in school and develop their game
Except for Alabama, they suck!
This in part is why the same programs in this decade remain the same names year in and year out at the top 15..
fun for fans, and sets an expectation to a degree, of what is to come if the players stay in school and develop their game
Except for Alabama, they suck!
Posted on 11/13/08 at 9:25 am to Cash
quote:
Why do you use this as a reason not to offer the kid, then turn around and say we should be offering Michael who's offer list is ver similar?
it's not the offer, it's the timing
i think this kids commits to LSU at any time before signing day. that's all
Posted on 11/13/08 at 9:29 am to Prominentwon
quote:
it would be a non-issue if Michael didn't have that extra little star next to his name.
i don't care if michael is a 4 star or a 5 star (same with ford). he's a playmaker at RB
ford is also a playmaker at RB, but i don't know if he is really a speedster. i think he gets to 215 or so and is our "all around" guy. then who's left as a speed back in 2 years? lache likely as a true freshman and?
if UF has shown anything, it's that you can't have enough speedy guys at RB when you're running a lot out of spread formations. they run FOUR guys out of that slotback position (harvin, james, rainey, and demps)
THAT is why i think we're making a mistake not going after michael more. it's a philosophy thing imho. miles wants big backs to run i-form, and he's recruiting those types. but i don't know if they fit in with crowton's spread/spread-option (esp with shep coming in)
Posted on 11/13/08 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
then who's left as a speed back in 2 years? lache likely as a true freshman and?
Murphy. You act as if Ford is slow. Listed at 4.5. Then you'll have Seastrunk, possibly. Your "X" factor player you love so much is (saying if LSU lands him) is Debose, IMO.
quote:
if UF has shown anything, it's that you can't have enough speedy guys at RB when you're running a lot out of spread formations. they run FOUR guys out of that slotback position (harvin, james, rainey, and demps)
LSU and Florida's offense are completely different. This is just my opinion, but I'd MUCH rather a couple big bruiser type backs that LSU has had in the past. I don't know why there's such a push from you about these smaller RB's.
This post was edited on 11/13/08 at 9:38 am
Posted on 11/13/08 at 9:41 am to Prominentwon
quote:
You act as if Ford is slow
well i don't think he's a burner
if he stays at his weight as of now, he'll be fast enough, but i don't think he will
quote:
LSU and Florida's offense are completely different.
the more crowton gets his guys in there, the more we'll become like UF
quote:
but I'd MUCH rather a couple big bruiser type backs that LSU has had in the past. I don't know why there's such a push from you about these smaller RB's.
we have a ton of big bruiser types at RB and we will continue to. we're getting 1 for sure and possibly 2 this year, and we still have ridley for 3 more years after this.
Back to top

3





