- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/17/10 at 2:17 pm to Rouge
quote:
i believe Blackmon and Jacobs will be converted to OL
That should solve all of our OL problems.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 2:31 pm to enod01
quote:
I hope you're counting on the RS freshman on this list to work miracles because the rest of these guys helped comprise of our piece of shite offensive line last year.
obviously you want to be negative about the team and the staff. your question was answered numerous times as we have many good young oline recruits coming up. we also had a big-time jc olineman decommit. I understand your 'want' for more quality oline recruits but we really are thin at rb with murphy (who is questionable with talent and injury issues), ridley and an unproven ford.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 3:14 pm to enod01
quote:
Can someone explain why
LSU fans think they know whats better for the program than the people hired to do that job?
No idea
Posted on 1/17/10 at 3:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
PLUS we have to feel the effect of attrition at OL next year (we didn't this year)
I don't agree with this. Yes we are losing our best starter, but at the same time we are going to go from having only 3 upperclassmen to 5. Hurst and Lonergran also saw some playing time as FR this year.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 3:19 pm to enod01
quote:
Can someone explain why we have 4 RB and only 3 O-line commits?
Captain Obvious would have already said, and probably has said as I type this...
because we need RBs badly and we don't need many OL.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 3:25 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Yes we are losing our best starter, but at the same time we are going to go from having only 3 upperclassmen to 5.
with jones/mccoy/thomas on the roster, we'd have older, more developed players
these losses didn't affect LSU this past year (except possibly LG), but they would be getting significant PT next year
Posted on 1/17/10 at 3:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
with jones/mccoy/thomas on the roster, we'd have older, more developed players
these losses didn't affect LSU this past year (except possibly LG), but they would be getting significant PT next year
Would they be getting PT next year? Are those guys any better then the guys on the roster who saw PT this year? I can see Jones as a loss that would hurt us next year, but I think Shaw was ahead of him anyways. Thomas and McCoy haven't done anything at the D-I level.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 5:52 pm to CalTiger
this is stupid. Running backs are some of the most versatile athletes on the team.
LB/WR/PR/KR/RB.
we have plenty of olineman.
HOWEVER, If you would have said DL you would have a better argument.
LB/WR/PR/KR/RB.
we have plenty of olineman.
HOWEVER, If you would have said DL you would have a better argument.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 6:45 pm to enod01
quote:
quote:
and we lost our best OL, a guy the young guys couldn't beat out
Isn't funny that these dudes keep forgetting this fact? Supposedly Black was an All-American level player, and we have lost him with the hope that some of these young dudes from our previous unimpressive classes of offensive lineman can step into his shoes. LOL!
At first glance I thought maybe you were either an idiot or just trying to flame in this thread, but now I have figured it out. You have a Typing Exam tomorrow don't you? You should be well polished by the time second period starts bud.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 7:45 pm to CalTiger
I think I know where enod is coming from. Because the OL was so sucky, we need to throw quantity at the problem. An offense of 10 OL and a QB would surely solve the problem. Or maybe a QB, one RB and nine OL, and then let's see what kind of running game we get.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 10:28 pm to Lovethutigahs
quote:
I think I know where enod is coming from. Because the OL was so sucky, we need to throw quantity at the problem. An offense of 10 OL and a QB would surely solve the problem. Or maybe a QB, one RB and nine OL, and then let's see what kind of running game we get.
So which o-linemen would make good receivers?
Posted on 1/17/10 at 11:13 pm to enod01
quote:Maybe you should fax Miles a letter pronto sparky...
Can someone explain why we have 4 RB and only 3 O-line commits?
Posted on 1/18/10 at 1:40 am to enod01
I think we are fine. Plus, if we only sign two next year (collins and white) we'll be set for OL.
2010
Tackle
Greg Shaw 6-5 290 JR
Chris Faulk 6-6 310 FR
Matt Branch 6-6 275 SO
Guard
Josh Dworaczyk 6-6 295 JR
Thomas Parsons 6-5 295 SO
Cordian Hagans 6-4 300 SO
Cassius Marsh 6-3 290 FR
Center
T-Bob Hebert 6-3 295 JR
PJ Lonergan 6-4 300 SO
Elliot Porter 6-4 280 FR
Guard
Will Blackwell 6-4 310 JR
Clay Spencer 6-5 285 SO
Josh Williford 6-7 320 FR
Tackle
Joseph Barksdale 6-5 300 SR
Alex Hurst 6-6 330 SO
Stavion Lowe 6-4 300 FR
Evan Washington 6-5 290 FR
2011
Tackle
Greg Shaw 6-5 290 sr
Chris Faulk 6-6 310 so
Matt Branch 6-6 260 jr
**La’el Collins 6-4 280 fr
Guard
Josh Dworaczyk 6-6 305 sr
Thomas Parsons 6-5 295 jr
Cordian Hagans 6-4 300 jr
**Corey White 6-4 305 fr
Center
T-Bob Hebert 6-3 295 sr
PJ Lonergan 6-4 300 jr
Elliot Porter 6-4 280 fr
Guard
Will Blackwell 6-4 310 sr
Clay Spencer 6-5 285 jr
Josh Williford 6-7 320 so
Cassius Marsh 6-3 300 fr
Tackle
Alex Hurst 6-6 330 jr
Stavion Lowe 6-4 300 so
Evan Washington 6-5 290 fr
17 OLs is a good number. 8 tackles and 9 interior for depth purposes. We go up 1 in '11.
2010
Tackle
Greg Shaw 6-5 290 JR
Chris Faulk 6-6 310 FR
Matt Branch 6-6 275 SO
Guard
Josh Dworaczyk 6-6 295 JR
Thomas Parsons 6-5 295 SO
Cordian Hagans 6-4 300 SO
Cassius Marsh 6-3 290 FR
Center
T-Bob Hebert 6-3 295 JR
PJ Lonergan 6-4 300 SO
Elliot Porter 6-4 280 FR
Guard
Will Blackwell 6-4 310 JR
Clay Spencer 6-5 285 SO
Josh Williford 6-7 320 FR
Tackle
Joseph Barksdale 6-5 300 SR
Alex Hurst 6-6 330 SO
Stavion Lowe 6-4 300 FR
Evan Washington 6-5 290 FR
2011
Tackle
Greg Shaw 6-5 290 sr
Chris Faulk 6-6 310 so
Matt Branch 6-6 260 jr
**La’el Collins 6-4 280 fr
Guard
Josh Dworaczyk 6-6 305 sr
Thomas Parsons 6-5 295 jr
Cordian Hagans 6-4 300 jr
**Corey White 6-4 305 fr
Center
T-Bob Hebert 6-3 295 sr
PJ Lonergan 6-4 300 jr
Elliot Porter 6-4 280 fr
Guard
Will Blackwell 6-4 310 sr
Clay Spencer 6-5 285 jr
Josh Williford 6-7 320 so
Cassius Marsh 6-3 300 fr
Tackle
Alex Hurst 6-6 330 jr
Stavion Lowe 6-4 300 so
Evan Washington 6-5 290 fr
17 OLs is a good number. 8 tackles and 9 interior for depth purposes. We go up 1 in '11.
This post was edited on 1/18/10 at 1:44 am
Posted on 1/18/10 at 3:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:How much better would they have done? I think we had great talent on the Line last season. Talent was NOT a problem.
ith jones/mccoy/thomas on the roster, we'd have older, more developed players
these losses didn't affect LSU this past year (except possibly LG), but they would be getting significant PT next year
Posted on 1/18/10 at 6:09 am to dstone12
quote:
Cassius Marsh 6-3 290 FR
quote:
Guard
Kid just dominated the AA game and you have already moved him to OL????
Posted on 1/18/10 at 6:16 am to Icansee4miles
quote:Signed,
Kid just dominated the AA game and you have already moved him to OL????
Joseph Barksdale
Posted on 1/18/10 at 7:16 am to CalTiger
If you remove every OL under 300 lbs, we don't have many.
Posted on 1/18/10 at 7:42 am to The King
We have 14 OL and will sign one more this class. We need high impact RB's.
Popular
Back to top


1








