- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can someone explain why we have 4 RB and only 3 O-line commits?
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:19 pm to CalTiger
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:19 pm to CalTiger
quote:
Barksdale hated LSU
the rant didn't update his twitter page
quote:
we had issues this year
and we lost our best OL, a guy the young guys couldn't beat out
quote:
and will remedy
yet to be seen
we haven't fired stud, and miles' recruiting record is shoddy PLUS we have to feel the effect of attrition at OL next year (we didn't this year)
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:21 pm to enod01
quote:
but the bottom line is that our eroding offensive line is what has been root cause of this.
and that would be corrected by signing more OL in the 2010 class how exactly?
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:21 pm to enod01
quote:
Is it just me, or does it seems absurd that a supposedly top 10 program hasn't been able to recruit a 5-star OL in 5 years,
blame the state of Louisiana
LA doesn't produce many top OL
faulk was close, and collins will be a 5-star next year
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and we lost our best OL, a guy the young guys couldn't beat out
Isn't funny that these dudes keep forgetting this fact? Supposedly Black was an All-American level player, and we have lost him with the hope that some of these young dudes from our previous unimpressive classes of offensive lineman can step into his shoes. LOL!
This post was edited on 1/17/10 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:23 pm to CalTiger
quote:
Florida Has 3 5* OL and that is only this WEEK!!!
Fla has only 1 OL signed for this class
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:23 pm to CalTiger
quote:
The rant also mentioned
Davenport getting a look at OL was in the Advocate's season ending interviews with Les Miles, but I guess you consider him to be a less than credible source.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:27 pm to enod01
quote:
e have lost him with the hope that some of these young dudes from our previous unimpressive classes of offensive lineman can step into his shoes. LOL!
I'm thinking you are just here to flame. You think our previous classes are unimpressive but are upset we are not recruiting more for this 1 class. What makes you think new recruits would fare better under the same staff?
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:29 pm to Icansee4miles
Just so I'm clear:
1. LSU's O-line is "utter garbage"
2. LSU can't recruit all 5-star OL
3. LSU can't develop the OL it has
4. LSU has about 15 OL on scholarship, plus at least two commits this year and two already next year
4. Ergo, LSU should sign more OL
1. LSU's O-line is "utter garbage"
2. LSU can't recruit all 5-star OL
3. LSU can't develop the OL it has
4. LSU has about 15 OL on scholarship, plus at least two commits this year and two already next year
4. Ergo, LSU should sign more OL
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the rant didn't update his twitter page
There were also enough on the rant who were waving NFL goodbyes to him. I was addressing that issue as well to point out the lack of verifiable facts from the rant.
quote:
and we lost our best OL, a guy the young guys couldn't beat out
If as the rant believes Miles plays seniors - then ciron was playing only because he was senior!
If he was playing because he was the best - hasn't there been enough proof that shows the players improve between the 1st and 2nd years? So where else do we have to go but up? Be it the starters or those in the rotation.
quote:
yet to be seen
we haven't fired stud, and miles' recruiting record is shoddy PLUS we have to feel the effect of attrition at OL next year (we didn't this year)
Except for the underlined part - the rest is your claim for the next year. I feel that the last year was an anomaly and with the younger players taking a major role I don't choose to see the year unfolding that way especially with no hard evidence.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:30 pm to enod01
2. And can you do the math? Our top 3 got hurt. So recruiting 2 leaves us at -1. Running backs take more punishment than any other position player on the team. You also need punt returners and kick off returners. Do you want to use your starting tailback to do this? What about full back? Some of the recruits could grow into that position. People should quit whining about every little thing.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:32 pm to rickyh
quote:This site would cease to exist.
People should quit whining about every little thing.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:34 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Florida Has 3 5* OL and that is only this WEEK!!!
Fla has only 1 OL signed for this class
I forgot to add that - the pitiable 5 5stars was only for THIS WEEK - their (Bama and Florida) actual target for the NSD is to divvy up the 26 5 stars amongst the Two of them.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:34 pm to CalTiger
quote:
I was addressing that issue as well to point out the lack of verifiable facts from the rant.
yeah well you shouldn't post an example that is 100% verifiable
quote:
I feel that the last year was an anomaly and with the younger players taking a major role
we returned 3 of 5 starters, along with our best OL coming back. we weren't young
unless you're claiming on blind faith that our young, inexperienced, undeveloped, and uncoached (thanks stud) OL will make our OL better
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:36 pm to bmy
The reason Alabama has 2 5* OL is because the recruits were from Alabama. It isn't LSU's fault we haven't had 2 5* in state OL recruits recently.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:36 pm to bmy
quote:
Alabama 2010, 2009, 2008:
5* - 2
4* - 4
3* - 6
and those 2 5-stars are looking more and more like busts...
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:38 pm to Ice Cold
quote:
1. LSU's O-line is "utter garbage"
2. LSU can't recruit all 5-star OL
3. LSU can't develop the OL it has
4. LSU has about 15 OL on scholarship, plus at least two commits this year and two already next year
4. Ergo, LSU should sign more OL
Just one clarification about the -"Ergo, LSU should sign more OL" .
The OP would prefer it to be "Ergo , LSU should sign only OLs and that too only 5 star OL in order to make up for the past 5 years"
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:42 pm to lsutiger2486
quote:
It isn't LSU's fault we haven't had 2 5* in state OL recruits recently.
pretty much
LA doesn't produce a great number of great OL or LBs
we do produce DL who can move to OL, however
we get a lot of our good OL from Texas
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
yeah well you shouldn't post an example that is 100% verifiable
THE lack of verifiable part was claiming that he was leaving because (the verified part) he posted something online about hating lsu -> I was pointing to that part
(BTW Now that I have explained the logic in it - that example was one amongst three to point out the ranter behavior - don't pick and chose a minor point and miss out on the major core of the discussion. )
quote:
unless you're claiming on blind faith that our young, inexperienced, undeveloped, and uncoached (thanks stud) OL will make our OL better
Blind faith has been the reason here that almost everyone has the presumption to think that they are better than and can outguess and over coach National Champion Title Winning coaches -> I don't think my faith ranks as high as that.
On the one hand we saw that we had the returning Best OL (as you claimed)
On the other hand the returning OL with multiple starters didn't perform to that level (another claim that you and the rant have made in lots of places)
If they truly are good then we should not be doubting the coaches who can recruit and coach them, If they are NOT good then the newer players can only be improvements.
Pick one!
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:47 pm to CalTiger
quote:
If they truly are good then we should not be doubting the coaches who can recruit and coach them, If they are NOT good then the newer players can only be improvements.
Pick one!
what about if they're not as good and they're not coached/developed well? that means it gets worse
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what about if they're not as good and they're not coached/developed well? that means it gets worse
This is where we get to the area where it is one opinion against another (with no facts to support either)
You can that this is how we will be this year - bad recruits and no coaching.
I can say that because we have new players and new energy that they might(will) be better.
We both cross our fingers and hope that I am correct and LSU wins
Popular
Back to top



3


