- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scheffler is no Tiger Woods and never has been
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:14 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:14 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Tiger's "charisma" is almost completely media created. He has the personality of a doorknob.
He did have charisma on the course especially relative to his peers when he came on the scene
Posted on 6/13/25 at 2:20 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
So why did you choose to make this post right now? Why didn't you make this post 2 weeks ago? If he was currently -2 would you have still made this post?
Because he’s a fricking idiot. He makes pride look smart with most of his posts
Posted on 6/13/25 at 3:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
He probably doesn't frick Waffle House waitresses so that is true
Perkins.
It’s kind of a high end IHOP
Posted on 6/13/25 at 3:20 pm to JamalMurry27
The only people that think Scottie is the new Tiger are people new to golf or too young to have watched prime Tiger.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:48 pm to JamalMurry27
Scheffler is putting up the same strokes gained stats as Prime Tiger. The field is deeper but this is what it would look like to have Tiger playing in 2025.
He is putting up the best 4-5 year run outside of 2005-2009 Tiger & 1970s Jack. Seriously, go look it up he is on another level right now.
He is putting up the best 4-5 year run outside of 2005-2009 Tiger & 1970s Jack. Seriously, go look it up he is on another level right now.
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:23 am to JamalMurry27
Number of times Tiger won at Oakmont?
Zero.
Zero.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 9:12 am to JamalMurry27
I for one am very glad he is NOT Tiger !
Posted on 6/15/25 at 2:06 am to JamalMurry27
Scheffler is on the spectrum. Be nice
Posted on 6/15/25 at 3:29 pm to IceFrogBC
These greens are absolutely kicking his arse. If he had the same number of 3 putts as Burns this week he’d be in the lead.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 11:43 pm to JamalMurry27
Scottie needs an asterisk because he doesn't compete with the world's best. He's mediocre at best.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 8:42 am to IceFrogBC
quote:
Cope harder lol
Scared to point out where I'm wrong?
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:31 am to IceFrogBC
quote:wow
Scottie needs an asterisk because he doesn't compete with the world's best. He's mediocre at best.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:51 am to JamalMurry27
Do you just run around to every board and post the dumbest shite you can think of?
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:50 am to JamalMurry27
Of course he’s not.
Nor is anyone else in history, including fat cigarette smoking Jack.
Nor is anyone else in history, including fat cigarette smoking Jack.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:34 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
Nor is anyone else in history, including fat cigarette smoking Jack.
Jack in his time was amazing.
Tiger in his time was amazing.
Golf courses are full of fat smokers so I don’t think that was the key to winning the most majors in history.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 2:17 am to JamalMurry27
Why do people defend Scheffler? He's not anywhere near Woods' league in any way. So strange.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 2:03 pm to slidingstop
quote:when major championship betting is essentially now scottie vs the field this is in essence calling him tiger woods. Like many people state vegas doesnt let you bet the opposite. Like when scottie was +200 to win the open (ridiculous) you cant bet that he wont -200 or even -240
No one has ever called him Tiger Woods. They've simply suggested he could be as good as Tiger Woods by the end of his career.
Popular
Back to top


0






