Started By
Message

re: Xbox1 Madden LG- Year 1, 2nd RD of Playoffs------Adv @ Fri 10 pm CST

Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:02 pm to
Posted by TopHog1
Member since Jan 2012
2623 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:02 pm to
I couldn't tell you without looking at each player to be honest. It looks good from first glance but that's not the issue.

The purpose of the rule is keep people from exploiting the cup trade logic. The cup doesn't look at age, dev, etc. It only sees overall. You can trade an old 31 year old 87 overall and a 4th rd pick to the cou for their first rd pick.


These leagues only last if their is some type of structure and rules.
Posted by TopHog1
Member since Jan 2012
2623 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:06 pm to
How many times it take you to get that trade through?
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:07 pm to
BS.. Most of the superstar DVP players are labeled untradeable by the CPU and often require multiple 1st round draft picks IF they'll even trade them at all

Don't take it too serious, you'll suck all the fun out of it.. Honestly I'm not that good and I'm not trying to exploit anything.. If anyone else in the league has a problem with the trade say something and I'll back out but honestly i don't care if you like the trade or not..
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:08 pm to
Two or three but why does that matter?

Do you get your trades to go through on the first try?
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 11:09 pm
Posted by TopHog1
Member since Jan 2012
2623 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:22 pm to
Not trying to suck the fun out of it. Just want to keep the rules in place and everyone play by them.

No ones taking anything to serious. If we can't have a discussion about this then there is an issue.

And I asked how many times because I wanted to know. And no I don't think anyone gets the trades to go through on first try
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:26 pm to
I already had my discussion about it so there obviously isn't an issue

I wasn't the only one who felt this way about this rule... I say we vote on it
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 11:27 pm
Posted by xxKylexx
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
4039 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:42 pm to
Okay my vote is we veto it because Chicago would never accept that trade. No one is trading for Asiata short of maybe giving up a conditional 7th rounder, let alone the RB of their future. I mean, I know Forte is there but that's a pretty unrealistic trade.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:46 pm to
You don't think someone would take a 3rd round pick for Jeremy Langford?





He was drafted in the 4th!!

ANDDD I threw in another RB to replace him






I didn't trade asiata for langford
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 11:48 pm
Posted by TopHog1
Member since Jan 2012
2623 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:51 pm to
No one has said a word about disliking posting trades. If someone disagrees they should speak up, trying to make it his league enjoyable for everyone.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:57 pm to
LINK


I wasn't the only one... Pretty sure someone else said something a few pages before that too but in not digging through it



Look if you want everyone to post when they make trades fine, but I'm not going to try to make a trade at 2 AM on a Saturday night before I play a game and wait for everyone to vote on a trade... That's just asinine




And it's beyond retarded for anyone to bitch about this trade
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 11:59 pm
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:59 pm to
Im done.. Going to bed kid.. I'll check the thread to see if anyone has anything to say when I take a shite at work tomorrow
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 12:00 am
Posted by TopHog1
Member since Jan 2012
2623 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:52 am to
Have a good day at Wal Mart loser
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 12:54 am
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:52 am to
I don't like the trade all that much since I don't think it would occur in real life, but I'd let it go this time. Let's just keep this rolling. There shouldn't be any problems trading wise the rest of the "year" at least

I agree though. If you're trading with CPU, I would like to see it posted beforehand to put to a vote. Yeah it's a pain, but I'd say that's fair since the CPU isn't very good at thinking things through except for the very immediate benefits. I wish I could trade my 2016 1st and 2017 2nd for Gurley, but the Rams would be idiots if that happened in real life getting rid of their player of the future. I know for sure the CPU would accept that though. Or 1st + 2nd for Marshal Yanda on Broncos... (Why is he on the Broncos? )
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:01 am to
Anyways

Bills seem to be building some crappy momentum. Goodwin is getting ready for the 2016 Rio Olympics by returning TDs. He recorded his second one against the Dolphins. The defensive line racked up the sacks and a safety, and the secondary caught two INTs. But... Tyrod gifted an INT back. Game got unnecessarily close. Ol' Rexy decided to take a chance on his own 40 yard line up by 6 on a 4th and 1 to clinch the game by converting with a run.

Backup LT Jordan Mills was released for giving up 5 (or 7? I don't remember) sacks on the season for some freak of a specimen LT from Army off of FA. 6'9" and 277# what the hell? We'll see how he plays...
Posted by Gleaux93
Member since Nov 2015
645 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:46 am to
I agree with the posted trade rule, but I don't have a problem with hangovers trade as unrealistic as it may be.

Commish, I can play anytime after 6 pm CST during the week.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 7:26 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 7:36 am
Posted by TigerfanfromMaryland
Eastern Shore Maryland
Member since Oct 2012
319 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 8:16 am to
I have no problem with the trade because its not like he really trade raped the Bears. I do agree that we should just float a general trade proposal to the board but I don't think a full league vote is necessary. Maybe put a limit on how many trades can take place during a given year per team or something along those lines. I also think that any trade offer you receive through the trade block can be accepted (not because I've done it already ) but because its not the user that's trying to push it through, it was CPU. I'd still post the offer the CPU is making and give it maybe a day to gauge the response or maybe even to see if another user wants to make a better offer.
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 8:25 am to
^ this seems reasonable. And let's all take a chill pill
Posted by Tiger Nation 84
Member since Dec 2011
36656 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 8:28 am to
If he throws in a 2nd rd pick or a better player with it I dont have a prob with the trade
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34932 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 8:50 am to
Why the hell would I trade a 2nd round pick for a guy who was drafted in the 4th the year before?? That shits just not logical




Y'all are making a fricking big deal about a backup running back... GTFO
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 8:52 am
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29 30 ... 73
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 73Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram