re: Why does a game that hasn't changed in 10 years....(NCAA)

You motherfrickers

There were so many MW2 threads on this board for so long... that I stopped reading the board, because I don't play MW2.

Visiting the board became a waste of time at that point.

If you want to create MW2 threads, go right ahead. That's what the board is for... to talk about gaming. You're just going to have to accept the fact that NCAA Football is the game of the moment, just as MW2 was the game of the moment (for a LONG while).

I still don't understand why everything that anyone finds interesting has to be a competition for attention. People who are interested in NCAA want to exchange ideas with people interested in NCAA. MW2 people want to talk with MW2 people. So talk. Why the disdain for each other?

I've never played MW2 and have no interest in it. I'm sure it's a fine game, and I hope everyone who plays it kicks arse at it. But I'm going to play NCAA football, because I like it. I don't need to bash MW2 to like NCAA Football more.

Yep. The additions of Dynasty Wire accessible on the internet, tuner sets, and formation subs alone make this game the best one since 360/Ps3 game out

quote:

---

if you didnt care, like you say you dont, you wouldnt have started this thread. Who gives a shite. Just ignore them. They arent gonna stop cause you tell them too. This thread is stupid as shite.

---

You really are a fricking moron. It's a wonder you can wipe your own arse.

quote:

---

To answer te question.

New players
improved gameplay
formation subs
online dynastys can be accessed online
locomotion system
team entrances
voice chat online
ways to adjust the tempo of the game

---

See, this is what I am wondering. I have 2010 and it was the same as 2008 and 2009. I assumed this was just more of the same like every year.

Was that so hard?

quote:

---

the threads are not that big of a deal. i get how they must have felt a few months back with all the threads. BUT some of the threads are kinda silly. How many Dynasty threads are there now?

---

Can only have so many in one dynasty brah

then why didnt you ask that in the original post.

quote:

---

See, this is what I am wondering. I have 2010 and it was the same as 2008 and 2009. I assumed this was just more of the same like every year.

Was that so hard?

---

but thats not even close to what you asked in the OP


seriously dude, you started this thread to rile up the NCAA guys, not ask about new features, because thats not what the OP says at all

quote:

---

Why does a game that hasn't changed in 10 years

---

I assumed someone would see this and clue me in to what has changed to make this one different. Silly me for assuming there were some semi intelligent people here.

I also pointed out the playbooks haven't changed so someone could correct me but I think I am 100% correct on that subject.

quote:

---

I also pointed out the playbooks haven't changed so someone could correct me but I think I am 100% correct on that subject.

---

I can't say for 100% but I thought I read that they changed the playbooks this year to fit teams. UF runs the spread option so their playbook shows it, etc. I have only played a little bit but LSU looks to have some new plays in the offensive sets.

I admit my mistakes. Did so several times yesterday when we were discussing the needed changes on the OT.

I just know what my intentions were here and you assuming the opposite is wrong.

You spend a lot of time, energy, and effort to make me look bad or twist things. It's actually become laughable and now I do shite just to get you going to be honest. The whole E3 shite was fun for me but you were so serious.