- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:53 am to sicboy
quote:
Holy shot
This argument is more or less pointless as while I respect you and even like you neither of us is going to move the needle for the other in any way. Let’s just agree to wait till launch and see whose right
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:53 am to Devious
quote:
I'm the farthest thing from a postmodernist.
So much so that you probably had to google how to spell it.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:55 am to sicboy
We're discussing it in our current sermon series.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:57 am to td01241
quote:
see whose right
Again, we're not saying it's going to be a big success. No one is arguing that point but you.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:57 am to Devious
quote:
We're discussing it in our current sermon series.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:58 am to Devious
You might not realize you actualized a lot of post modern philosophy but you do. In this thread alone. A major red flag of this is something that has a fancy name among the 15 or logical fallacies I can’t recall but it basically boils down to on a debate you deliberately omit almost all of your opponents argument and boil it down to as if it is something that is crazy because it seems so denied that context. The example here is acting like the past 6-7 years of examples and pattern reckonition aren’t part of my argument or observations. I don’t think you’re actually doing this maliciously just like I don’t think sicboy is malicious but you and many other people do it all the same.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:59 am to sicboy
Now you’re retreating from where you started changing what is an easy extrapolation from your initial claim that there’s widespread hype for this game to you believing it’ll be a success. Why obfuscate?
This post was edited on 8/17/24 at 9:00 am
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:59 am to td01241
Stop. I believe in absolute truths. But video game opinions don't fall under them.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:02 am to Devious
It’s not an opinion. It’s an observation based on pattern recognition and the actual real groundswell of gamer sentiment not only to this game but souring on the games using this concept overall. You can be pedantic and call that an opinion but there’s clearly a distinction between the two
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:02 am to td01241
I said the chatter I've seen about it has been mostly positive. That's it. Games have had positive buzz going in and then bombed. It happens.
You're making the claim that there's irrefutable proof that this game will be a disaster, which is what I was pushing back on. Not anymore.
You're making the claim that there's irrefutable proof that this game will be a disaster, which is what I was pushing back on. Not anymore.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:04 am to td01241
No... it's an opinion with assumptions that what you believed has happened in pockets of the industry have factually happened with this game. Which is one of those logical fallacies you can't recall the name of.
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:05 am to Joshjrn
quote:That they have done diddly shite with, as they have STILL been putting EVERYTHING into Anthem.
Since then, they’ve circled the wagons a bit and are going back to their two classic IPs: DA and ME.
quote:Having been a longtime fan of Bioware, pre-EA, I can assure you this is more the mentality.
If the lesson they learned was “we did nothing wrong, new IPs are just hard; let’s do the same thing, but with an old IP!” It will be a disaster.
They have already admitted that this will not really be a party-based game in the same way the others have been.
You know, the thing people enjoy about the games?
This is akin to Bethesda saying "the next Elder Scrolls game will be an on-rails game, rather than an Open World"
I swear BG3 comes out, does everything right, Bioware sees it succeeding and thinks "maybe the opposite of all that will be successful!!!!"
Dated Fortnite models, Ps3 textures and graphics, turning a party-based game into a single character game, making every character bisexual. . . .
. . .not to mention the most recent decision by the company regarding one of the greatest RPG IPs in video game history (Mass Effect).
What gives you confidence that they have learned from their mistakes?
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:05 am to sicboy
Ok I’ll make a concession. There’s not irrefutable proof. There’s just an overwhelming amount of factors indicating it’s failure is unavoidable. So yes I was incorrect if I ever stayed it was irrefutable or suggested it. See I’m not a dick
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:06 am to td01241
quote:
overwhelming amount of factors
no
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:11 am to sicboy
People today love using top-tier words for effect
It is annoying. Why not just say many, or a lot?
It is annoying. Why not just say many, or a lot?
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:17 am to Roaad
Sorry if that annoys you. I’m a linguist amongst other things like a syndicated journalist so I often use unnecessarily long words I suppose and can be long winded. It’s not intentional to be annoying just how I’ve been condition through years of being in human intelligence in the military then my bachelors and masters
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:26 am to td01241
quote:It isn't the size of the words. I have a greater than 5th grade vocabulary, as well.
I’m a linguist amongst other things like a syndicated journalist so I often use unnecessarily long words I suppose and can be long winded.
It is what the words mean vs how they are being used,
It is like Millenials and Z'ers using "literally" and such
Those words have meanings.
When I say top tier, I don't mean they are difficult to understand, I mean you jump to "overwhelming" instead of "a lot"
Just like instead of something being "not as good as other thing", it has to be complete dogshit. . .worst thing ever.
This post was edited on 8/17/24 at 9:29 am
Back to top


2




