Started By
Message

re: Which Pinot should I order

Posted on 8/2/10 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by Foot
Member since Jan 2005
2330 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Try RN Estate or Chateau Margene. Both are small but make outstanding wines, Pinot Noir among them. San Luis Obispo, just a short drive from Paso Robles holds a Pinot Noir Festival every March. I went in March and tasted some excellent Pinots.


World of Pinot! Kicks arse. Great event with Pinots from all over the world on a cliff overlooking the Pacific.

I agree with RN Estate and Chateau Margene, great producers.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
20605 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Gary Farrell
He actually sold his winery about six years ago to Allied Domeq. The wines were still pretty good after the sale due to their grape sources and his consulting, but I'm not sure what role, if any, he still has with the winery at this point. I wouldn't expect future vintages to approach what they were when he was owner/winemaker.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
20605 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

I don't agree. I've found a few very nice Pinots in Paso Robles. I know that Zin does a lot better there, but there are some nice Pinots. Try RN Estate or Chateau Margene. Both are small but make outstanding wines, Pinot Noir among them. San Luis Obispo, just a short drive from Paso Robles holds a Pinot Noir Festival every March. I went in March and tasted some excellent Pinots.

I hear what you're saying, but el tigre's got a point. As a general rule, it's too hot in those areas to grow pinot noir, which isn't to say there might not be a few good ones sourced from there. I think his point is that when you think California pinot noir, those areas are pretty far down on the list of AVAs that consistently grow great pinot noir across the area.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
65287 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 6:50 pm to
I wouldn't put Paso Robles and the Santa Rita Hills in the same boat when it come to pinot noir. I've never had a pinot from Paso Robles that I liked, but I've had many, many outstanding pinots from the Santa Rita Hills. Sine Qua Non (when they were still making pinot noir), Brewer-Clifton, Sea Smoke and Foxen come to mind as wineries making world class pinot in the Santa Rita Hills. Other wineries like Fess Parker, Dragonette, Hartley-Ostini, and Ojai Vineyards also make excellent pinot from Santa Rita Hills vineyards like like Clos Pepe, Cargasacchi, Ampelos, Bien Nacido, Ashley's and Sweeney Canyon.
This post was edited on 8/2/10 at 7:02 pm
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
20605 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 6:57 pm to
I agree with you. I've never had a pinot from Paso that I cared for, I've had a many from Santa Barbara that were good, and I've had many from the SRH AVA that I thought were great. I don't care for the high alcohol style that frequently comes from those areas, but the wines are generally well made. Having said all that, my favorite AVA for California pinot is the Sonoma Coast.
Posted by emigretiger
Member since Mar 2007
444 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 7:48 pm to
Have you ever tasted anything from LeCuvier?
Posted by Foot
Member since Jan 2005
2330 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Le Cuvier


A friend here used to be the assistant winemaker there. They make more of an "old world" style wine.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
65287 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Have you ever tasted anything from LeCuvier?
I've heard of it, but never tried any of their wines. it's in Paso Robles, right? Are the wines good?
Posted by emigretiger
Member since Mar 2007
444 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 9:48 pm to
I like them, they are well made but high in alcohol. I've got 2 bottles of Zin that I'm afraid to open, 16.8%. I know zin has a higher alcohol content but that's almost a Port. I had a Cab Franc with a grilled ribeye the other day that was very nice even with 15.5%. I'm not anal about Alcohol content but I usually prefer the 13.5 - 14.5 percentages.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
65287 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

I like them, they are well made but high in alcohol. I've got 2 bottles of Zin that I'm afraid to open, 16.8%. I know zin has a higher alcohol content but that's almost a Port. I had a Cab Franc with a grilled ribeye the other day that was very nice even with 15.5%. I'm not anal about Alcohol content but I usually prefer the 13.5 - 14.5 percentages.
Yikes! 16.8% is high, even for a zin. I had a syrah recently that was 16.9% believe it or not. It was the 2006 Fess Parker Big Easy. In theory I don't care what the alcohol content is as long as the wine is balanced, but this wine was way out of balance. I normally love their single vineyard syrahs, but I did not care very much for this wine.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
77734 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 10:21 pm to
Duckhorn is the best.

Posted by Foot
Member since Jan 2005
2330 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

Alcohol content but I usually prefer the 13.5 - 14.5 percentages.


You'd be surprised. Most wines are higher in Alc than what is listed. The higher tax bracket cut off is at 14%, and you can be up to +/- 1.5% off. Most wines listed at 13.8 can be much higher. And if it's a smaller production wine, it may be more than 1.5% higher as it's less risky to get caught by the Feds.
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 8/3/10 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The higher tax bracket cut off is at 14%, and you can be up to +/- 1.5% off. Most wines listed at 13.8 can be much higher.


good info.

Posted by Foot
Member since Jan 2005
2330 posts
Posted on 8/4/10 at 11:23 am to
El Tigre,

I want to clarify as I don't want to be giving out bad info as I was only half right, and got the rest of the info from a friend.

The wine tax bracket increases at 14% and then at 20%. Wines below 14% alcohol can have a range of +/- 0.5% while wines above 14% can have a range of +/- 1.5%. You can list a wine at whatever you like, but if you list a wine that's above 14% into the lower tax bracket and the TTB finds out about it, they can destroy your product and maybe shut you down. I suppose that it still happens out there. Then there are tax breaks on the size of your winery, based on how many cases you produce in a year.

Just wanted to clear things up.
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 8/4/10 at 11:26 am to
quote:

The wine tax bracket increases at 14% and then at 20%


that was my next question, what was the next tax level. Are you familiar with Scott Cellars in Los Olivos? not a big place at all, but some of his wines are really high alcohol content. He has one called Know Shore (or Krow Shore, can't remember) that is listed at somewhere around 16% if i remember correctly. He refers to it as "cheap date" red.

thanks for clearing it up as well.
Posted by Foot
Member since Jan 2005
2330 posts
Posted on 8/4/10 at 11:40 am to
I'm not familiar with Scott Cellars, but wines 16% and above are not uncommon on the Central Coast. Recently there's been wine yeasts isolated that can not only produce that much alcohol but survive in that environment until there's no more sugar. There was a demand for it because most yeasts will die off at about 15% leaving wines still sweet, incomplete (in the eyes of the winemaker), and tough to re-ferment.
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
22281 posts
Posted on 8/4/10 at 12:21 pm to
1.
quote:

Domaine Drouhin, Pinot Noir, Willamette Valley, Oregon,


2.
quote:

Domaine Carneros, Pinot Noir, Carneros, California,

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram