Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on bringing in food to another establishment...

Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:42 am to
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6517 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:42 am to
quote:

we were never told anything about it either.


I would imagine this is because BK didn't see you bring it in?

Posted by ccla
70815
Member since May 2007
12016 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:44 am to
I never Hid it. It was plain for all to see It was subway.....
Posted by CPT 8ch
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
293 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:49 am to
How many of you have kids?

I can tell you from experience that you can almost never satisfy small children at the same restaurant that you would like to eat.

While I would never personally bring Burger King bags into a restaurant with servers/waiters, I can somewhat see the parents point of view. I'm sure this particular couple knows their children well and while their tactics aggravated you, they may have made your dining experience tolerable by satisfying their childern with Burger King enstead of forcing them to eat from the buffet. Sometimes its just easier to get them what they like instead of forcing them to all eat the same thing.

I would suggest to those people who have to satisfy small children, but do not want McDonalds or Burger King to just go to the mall food court. They should be able to satisfy everyone there.

Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98758 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:54 am to
Not to change the subject, but do all of you really feed your kids that much fast food? I was in high school before I ate Burger King or McDonald's. I can't imagine that's good for them.
Posted by simmons2112
Member since May 2008
3184 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Sometimes its just easier to get them what they like instead of forcing them to all eat the same thing.


That's the point though. If you bring kids with you out to eat, eat at a place where EVERYONE can eat. Or don't go out to eat.

If the kids only eat BK then the parents should eat friggin' BK.

Like I said, I hate Piccadilly but I eat it because they have food we can feed our children.

The places we eat at have food that our kids will eat. If they don't, like at a sushi place for instance, we either don't go there or our kids don't go.
This post was edited on 8/13/09 at 9:57 am
Posted by simmons2112
Member since May 2008
3184 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:55 am to
quote:

do all of you really feed your kids that much fast food?


I have 2 year old twins and they have eaten McDonalds chicken nuggets maybe twice....on trips to Gulf Shores. My wife cooks every night and if we do go out to eat on a Sunday it's to Piccadilly.
Posted by CPT 8ch
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
293 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 9:58 am to
When my kids were young, we ate fast food very seldom and used it as a treat when they did something really good (grades, etc).

They at 15 and 11 now so we don't have those problems any more.
Posted by CPT 8ch
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
293 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:12 am to
I realize your point and I agree with you. And like you, I hate Piccadilly; that's why I made the suggestion of the mall food court.

While we never caved that badly, I really don't have a problem with what other couples feed their children to make them happy. I would rather see a kid eating Burger King at a Chinese buffet than to have them whine and cry and make my experience bad.

When my kids were younger, the only time we brought bags from one place to another was usually when I refused to eat McDonalds or Burger King and I would bring my Subway sandwich in to eat with my family. And even then, I would at least buy my drink from the place we were eating. I never hid it and I really don't think the management of those restaurants had a issue with it.
Posted by simmons2112
Member since May 2008
3184 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I really don't have a problem with what other couples feed their children to make them happy.


I really don't care either. If a family wants to feed their children junk to keep them quiet while I eat, so be it.

I was just asked the question and said I believe people should go where their entire family can eat.

I think it is in poor taste to bring in food from another place.
Posted by CPT 8ch
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
293 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:32 am to
quote:

I think it is in poor taste to bring in food from another place


I agree. But like I said, it doesn't bother me and besides, when people do this, it gives my wife someone to talk about.

I'm just gald my kids are old enough that we don't have to worry about that anymore. The problem now is that they both eat like adults so dinner out without drinks now costs a minimum of $80.00 instead of $40.00.
Posted by TomballTiger
Htown
Member since Jan 2007
3970 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:38 am to
One of my three boys has autism and will only eat french fries basically. So if we go to a place that does not have them we have to bring them in. I would never do it for the other two.
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
6838 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:39 am to
Having two kids, I honestly don't have a problem with it as long as they don't eat anything from the place. Not tacky and I'm sure the people at the Chinese place are happy to have two paying customers as opposed to 0! Get a life, it's not a Rest August or similar.

That being said, I go where I can find something for my kids to eat b/c I'm not stopping at another place to get something.
This post was edited on 8/13/09 at 10:45 am
Posted by simmons2112
Member since May 2008
3184 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 10:48 am to
quote:

The problem now is that they both eat like adults so dinner out without drinks now costs a minimum of $80.00 instead of $40.00.


I don't want to think about this. My twins are 2 and I thought the wife buying bags and bags of organic veggies was expensive. When these 2 really start eating I'm going to have to geta job as a WalMart greeter on weekends to pay for it.
Posted by loussenile
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
758 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 12:46 pm to
Dont let your kids get that damn picky.
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20047 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 1:06 pm to
My daughters are 3 and 5, and luckily not picky (5 yo is getting there due to friends says veggies are yucky, etc).

I bring them to fancy restaurants all the time and can always find something for them to eat (the 3yo loves cold boiled shrimp).

I have no problem with bringing food in for the kids, but I would never do it.

I don't understand, what kid does not love chow mein noodle? My kids would live on these if I let them.
Posted by ladytiger118
Member since Aug 2009
20922 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 3:45 pm to
I agree with the poster who said that the parents should've either eaten somewhere where the whole family could eat, get takeout from the buffett, or feed the children beforehand and let them snack on fruit at the buffett (this option is a good compromise).

I won't lie, I was an incredibly picky eater as a child. I hated beef, burgers, tacos, etc. and would only consume fruit, veggies, and Mickey D's chicken nuggets. However, I never made a fuss at restaurants and was usually content with coloring the paper drawings that come with the menu. Kids' tastebuds change as they get older/are exposed to different foods. By the time they're 10/11, they're more open-minded and are willing to try a variety of food. For instance, I no longer consume chicken nuggets (I'm a college student now), and I tend to opt for healthier foods, such as salads with dressing on the sides, dishes that have tons of veggies, etc. I try not to consume any fried food at all.
This post was edited on 8/13/09 at 3:47 pm
Posted by Eddie Vedder
The South Plains
Member since Jan 2006
4438 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

I was an incredibly picky eater as a child.


there was no such thing as a picky eater in the house i grew up in. you had two choices: 1) eat what was cooked, or 2) eat nothing at all. this policy was NOT negotiable.

we rarely ate at restaurants because we didn't have a lot of money and eating out was a luxury. BUT, on the rare special occasion we did eat out, the same rule applied. you ate off the menu or you ate nothing.

consequently, i'm in agreement with most on here: 1) eat off the menu, or 2) don't bring your family to the restaurant. i don't care what kind of restaurant, i don't think it is right to bring outside food.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram