Started By
Message

re: Homebrewing Thread: Volume II

Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:13 pm to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:13 pm to
So i discussed with my brother and we will attempt our first lambic brew day in the winter. My grandparents used to own an old indian mound that they lived next to. The property is still in the family name, though it is empty at the moment.

Option 1. We were talking of waiting until it gets near freezing (so probably a small window in January/February) and brewing out there, and cooling in the ambient open air temps before transferring to a fermenter.
Option 2 - Less risky, but make some wort and put them in some jars with a cheese cloth and place them in various spots around the mound/property. Then prop up these batches a bit and see what happens. If it tastes/smells great, then continue propping up the starter and dumping, like you do a sourdough starter until its strong enough to ferment a beer. This process may take much longer than option a, but may be more effective.

For mash, there are 2 options as well. I'm leaning towards option 1.

Option 1 - Step Mash schedule. Beta-amylase rest around 146, alpha amylase rest around 160, and a high tannin extraction fly sparge near 190. Followed by a 2 hour boil.
Option 2 is a traditional turbid mash, but from what i've read, that's really not necessary at all anymore, and i don't really have the equipment for it. Here's a visual of the process.

Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 8:11 am to
a few Chapters in to Scotts book. I have some ideas on how to hone my flavors in. Im itching to get to the other chapters.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 8:36 am to
quote:

a few Chapters in to Scotts book. I have some ideas on how to hone my flavors in. Im itching to get to the other chapters.


It's got a lot of interesting information. I've tried to put a few into practice. I did the mash hopping last batch, but i can't tell a difference. Frankly, the more i read, i think this book is probably more valuable to large scale brewery operations. Either that or I just suck at making hazy IPA's.

My latest, which is still freshly kegged, is not what i want it to be. Even with closed transfer, i can't get enough hop aroma/flavor out of it. I think i need to go back to reducing the temp @ whirlpool. I whirlpooled at 180 the last 2 batches, and haven't been happy. Previously, i've been whirlpooling @ 170.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 8:58 am to
quote:

CarRamrod


I'm going to post my last recipe and brew process, let me know if something stands out, because i'm still not satisfied with my NEIPA's.

Water
9.75 total gallons Baton Rouge water (with a balanced sulfate/chloride profile)

Mash Salts
4.88g CaCl
2.17g Epsom Salt
1.84g Gypsum
.5 tbsp 88% Lactic acid to get mash Ph to 5.3

Sparge Salts
5.8g CaCl
2.59g Epsom Salt
2.18g Gypsum

Grains
7 lbs (49%) 2 Row
2.75 lbs (19.3%) Golden Promise
2.25 lbs (15.8%) Carapils
2.25 lbs (15.8%) Oat Malt

Hops
1 oz Citra - Mash
1 oz Citra - Boil 20 min
2 oz. Idaho 7 - Whirlpool @ 180, 25 min
1 oz. Citra - Whirlpool @ 180, 25 min
2 oz. Citra - biotrans hops added Day 2/3 of ferm
1 oz. galaxy - biotrans hops added Day 2/3 of ferm
1 oz. Idaho 7 - biotrans hops added Day 2/3 of ferm
2 oz citra - Dry hop 3 days
2 oz galaxy - dry hop 3 days
1 oz idaho 7 - dry hop 3 days

Yeast
Bootleg Biology Chardonnay

Session Data
Mash @ 152 for 60 minutes
Fly Sparge
83% Mash efficiency
OG - 1.062
FG - did not take measurement, fermented for 9-10 days. Fermentation did take off slow, despite using a starter. Wasn't until 36 hours later did i see fermentation activity.
Cold crashed for 2 days before kegging.
Closed transfer to purged keg. Removed the keg lid only to see to check volume inside keg. Purged keg once filled, then rolled around to mix in the 32 psi of force carb.
Let force carb @ 32 psi for 24 hours, reduced carbonation to 14-15 psi for 2 days. Transferred keg to kegerator, and kept serving pressure @ 8-9 psi. Currently @ day 5 of being in the keg.

Appearance/Flavor
- Appears darker than i expected. I do not believe it is oxidized, however, because it is not brown, just very hazy at the moment. First pour on first day in kegerator, and the foam was even slightly green. Tasted it day 2, and it was very young. Tasted it yesterday and it's starting to smooth out. It is more bitter than my previous batches, that could be due to the higher whirlpool temps extracting alpha acids.

A few things i know i will do differently
1) Break up the 5 oz dry hop into a 3 oz dry hop, and a 2-3 oz. keg hop.
2) Lower whirlpool temp
3) Try a different yeast.
4) May or may not eliminate the 1 oz mash hop. The intent of the mash hop, per Janish's book, is that this hop during the mash, reduces some of the manganese content of the grains, further limiting oxygen pickup chances.
5) May go back to flaked oats instead of oat malt. I switched to oat malt, again, due to the manganese content of flaked oats.
6) Lower the amount of oats/carapils to a combined total of no more than 12%.


ETA: Looking back at some of my previous recipes and one NEIPA in particular i really liked and some differences.

- Flaked oats instead of malted oats, at a much smaller amount (4% flaked oats/4% carapils as opposed to 15%/15% oat malt to carapils.
- Used WLP067 Coastal Haze Yeast
- Had a biotrans, and 2 additional dry hop additions.
- OG - 1.065, FG - 1.016, 6.5% ABV
- had a 25 IBU First Wort hop addition

another ETA: I believe the bolded is the most notable difference and could be the cause for a maltier flavor component and suppression of some of the hop notes.
This post was edited on 8/7/20 at 9:12 am
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 9:01 am to
quote:

It's got a lot of interesting information. I've tried to put a few into practice. I did the mash hopping last batch, but i can't tell a difference. Frankly, the more i read, i think this book is probably more valuable to large scale brewery operations. Either that or I just suck at making hazy IPA's.
maybe so but i havent read ahead much so im not to mash hopping but a bullet i did read, a benefit of mash hopping was to remove metal elements that would cause oxidation. Which you might not see the benefits unless you hold on to a keg for an extended amount of time.

But you might want to reverse the "i suck at" to "im already good at" because some of this information im reading, at first i feel like ohh thats common knowledge, when really, it might be common to use in this thread who have been discussing the process for the past 3-4 years.

because really, I would put a good fresh batch of one of my NEIPA recipes up against ANY NEIPA i have ever tried.
This post was edited on 8/7/20 at 9:03 am
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 9:32 am to
I have been struggling on my last 2 NEIPAs as well. They are too green when they are first ready to drink, and by the time that they have settled, they are beginning to oxidize... I have a couple changes I am going to implement on my next try. I'm determined to get the process down.
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 9:42 am to
Also, entered my first homebrew competition last weekend. Clash of the Carboys here in BR. I entered a Rye IPA. For some reason, this beer took longer than every other beer I have brewed to properly carbonate, which was infuriating. I waited as long as I could to submit it, hoping to get the right carb level, but in the end I knew it wasn't happening.

I scored a 32/50 which I am happy about given I lost a decent amount of points for it being under carbonated. Overall, I was glad to finally get some feedback on my brews. I guess I am my own biggest critic, but I was expecting alot of these comments. I think I need to tinker with my dry hopping process because I feel like I get a harsh bitterness that stays around for too long. There is not enough hop "flavor" instead you get the aroma, and then you are met with some harsh bitterness. The beer has definitely gotten better since my entry, and I wish I could have had a few more days to turn it in. All things considered, I am happy with the results. I will definitely be entering more in the future.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 9:44 am to
I did a quick glance, in a bit ill dive a little deeper but im in a workshop. the 2 glaring things i see are your water and yeast. I wont do a NEIPA without RO water anymore and build form there. i can send you and example Bru'n spread sheet of one of my recipes before i moved completely to BS3.

Next is yeast. I tried chardonnay and didnt get a good texture. my Go to is still London 3, with a huge starter. Vermont IPA is decent but in a head to head I thought London 3 just had a better texture and flavor.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 10:10 am to
quote:

I scored a 32/50 which I am happy about given I lost a decent amount of points for it being under carbonated. Overall, I was glad to finally get some feedback on my brews. I guess I am my own biggest critic, but I was expecting alot of these comments.


Congrats. My first competition was a stout that didn't turn out like i expected. I think i got a 30/50. But it was great getting feedback.

I only entered 1 other competition since, managed to get gold in style (hefeweizen, it was either a 44/50 or 46/50) and Runner up to best of show. The other beer i sent in was an oktoberfest that did not carb up all the way by the time of competition. I think i got a 36 or 38/50. I would love to do another competition, but i never seem to have a beer style ready in time. I don't really brew for competitions, more for what i feel like drinking. I plan on doing an English Bitter in the future, maybe there will be a competition available when i do.

My sours, unfortunately, will likely not see competition. They are bottled in mostly 750, 500, or 375 mL belgian bottles, and most still have the old labels on. Additionally, i number the cap of each beer, so i know what i'm drinking, as they are all bottle conditioned. And then, while i can brew to the style, i often add fruit, or do something else that isn't quite to style of what is listed on the BJCP. Maybe my l'internationale Saison (which i'm brewing this weekend) could suffice. But it wouldn't be a saison style, because i blend with a mixed culture sour at a small ratio, and might not fully be considered a sour, as the acidity is more restrained.

Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

. They are too green when they are first ready to drink, and by the time that they have settled, they are beginning to oxidize...


ARe you kegging or bottling? If bottling, it's really hard to prevent oxidation in that style. If you have access to CO2 and some homebrew kegs, then you can do a closed transfer system, which works out very well for my purposes. My last 5 or so NEIPA's have never had trouble with oxidation. My 2nd to last NEIPA sat in the keg for maybe 3-4 months before i needed to make room for something else, and it never oxidized.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 10:30 am to
I also see you are using a ton of carapils. one of my recipes i pulled up was 8oz in a 10 gallon batch. It has a low lovibond but i have noticed it add more color than what beersmith and its 1.5 number says.

Also try adding some flaked wheat and or white wheat. I have almost 10% wheat in my recipes.

on to hop schedule. never done mash hopping yet so ill ignore that. IDK what IBUS your getting with 1oz of citra at 20 for a 5 gallon batch but i use in the realm of 10-12 IBUS in boiling. Are you beers more bitter than you want?
This post was edited on 8/7/20 at 10:31 am
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 10:32 am to
I ferment and serve in kegs. I did a completely closed transfer for my last one, so I was a bit confused how it turned so fast. There would have to be intrusion at some point in my process, but I don't see anywhere that I could have anything but minuscule intrusion. I'll probably try a few things:

- On my last one, I dry-hopped in the serving keg, and purged it with CO2. I think my best bet would be to scrap that, just dry-hop in the fermenter, and fill the serving keg with starsan and then force out the starsan with CO2. I think that would be a safer play

- Think I might switch to a cut dip tube instead of the floating dip tube. I feel like the floating one might be picking up some air. The air should theoretically all be CO2 anyway though. Idk, its something different, worth a shot.

- Adding something like Sodium Metabisulfate to help with oxygen. I've even thought about dextrose, to get another small fermentation and hopefully purge whatever oxygen is left. Idk.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 10:49 am to


quote:

Are you beers more bitter than you want?



The last couple were. But previous were fine. I aim for around 20 IBU's in the boil.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25948 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 12:26 pm to
I had great aroma on my NEIPA but it fell off after three weeks. I would only dry hop once. I hear the second dry hop is not worth it. It's more of a chance to get O2 into your beer at the tail end of the fermentation. I'm also going to try whirlpooling at 110 instead of 170. That's all I've got. I'm going to try to frick up another one this weekend.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

whirlpooling at 110 instead of 170. That's all I've go
i wouldnt. this book im reading that Bug has read referencing studies show whirlpooling at hight temps are better for both aroma and flavor than lower temps.
This post was edited on 8/7/20 at 12:37 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25948 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 12:47 pm to
frick man. I don't even know anymore. My NEIPA was awesome for like 3 weeks and then it hit the wall with no signs of oxidation. I think my issue was I only used whirlpool hops.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

My NEIPA was awesome for like 3 weeks and then it hit the wall with no signs of oxidation.
well i think this is typical. I can see a nocticable flavor reduction in my from 2-4 weeks plus. I believe this is a reason that the NEIPA style will never be a major beer in macro breweries because of its shelf life. I see it in my NEIPAs where they are in prime flavor about 1-2 weeks after kegging and will last for about 2 weeks and then is degrades. still drinkable, just not fresh and robust. Another observation is tasting a nice pint of Ghost at the tap room, is very nice, yet you buy a 4 pack thats a couple weeks old and it is less than mediocre.

I will say i have never really had an oxidation issue with my neipas.
This post was edited on 8/7/20 at 1:00 pm
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27105 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 2:04 pm to
Brewing up a saison tonight.

8 lbs pilsner
1/2 lb munich
3 lbs Japanese rice
565/3724 yeast combo
All saaz on the hops

I brewed a saison a little over a month ago, but I wasn't happy with it. Too heavy on the banana and a little cloying. Trying something different with a more fermentable wort and going to start fermentation in the upper 70's as opposed to upper 60s like last time.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27105 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 2:12 pm to
quote:


Option 1. We were talking of waiting until it gets near freezing (so probably a small window in January/February) and brewing out there, and cooling in the ambient open air temps before transferring to a fermenter.
Option 2 - Less risky, but make some wort and put them in some jars with a cheese cloth and place them in various spots around the mound/property. Then prop up these batches a bit and see what happens. If it tastes/smells great, then continue propping up the starter and dumping, like you do a sourdough starter until its strong enough to ferment a beer. This process may take much longer than option a, but may be more effective.



That's what I'd do. I've done option #1 before and it came out super band-aidy. Sucks to do that all that work and wait a year for it to be a dumper. I'd rather go in knowing what the outcome would probably be.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52805 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

I hear the second dry hop is not worth it.


Dry hopping twice (in addition to biotrans hopping) just increases your chances of oxidation, from what i read. I've gone away from that, and do a biotrans hop, 1 dry hop, then a keg hop, or eliminate the dry hop altogether and just do bio trans and keg hop.
first pageprev pagePage 229 of 277Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram