- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Budweiser Project - Please give your opinions!
Posted on 11/24/08 at 12:19 pm to geauxcubs23
Posted on 11/24/08 at 12:19 pm to geauxcubs23
my feelings about budweiser reflect powerman's. except he's being too kind.
budweiser and miller brewing for that matter brew total shite and resort to clever ad campaigns to market their swill. because these beers are for girly men who don't like the taste of real beer, they produce hyper-masculine ads with lots of T and A or ads like the "man law" foolishnes to affirm the manhood of their patrons who should in fact be ashamed for drinking such weak shite.
because their beer tastes like shite and the people who drink it wouldn't know good beer if it bit them on the arse, they've got to tout their beers' "drinkability," which is code for "it tastes like water, not beer, so you'll like it you non-beer drinking douchebag".
budweiser's merger with inbev doesn't mean anything. inbev brews and distributes the swill better known as stella artois, which is the greatest beer farce since distributors convinced middlebrow beer drinkers that coronoa and heineken were worth a damn.
budweiser and miller brewing for that matter brew total shite and resort to clever ad campaigns to market their swill. because these beers are for girly men who don't like the taste of real beer, they produce hyper-masculine ads with lots of T and A or ads like the "man law" foolishnes to affirm the manhood of their patrons who should in fact be ashamed for drinking such weak shite.
because their beer tastes like shite and the people who drink it wouldn't know good beer if it bit them on the arse, they've got to tout their beers' "drinkability," which is code for "it tastes like water, not beer, so you'll like it you non-beer drinking douchebag".
budweiser's merger with inbev doesn't mean anything. inbev brews and distributes the swill better known as stella artois, which is the greatest beer farce since distributors convinced middlebrow beer drinkers that coronoa and heineken were worth a damn.
This post was edited on 11/24/08 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 11/24/08 at 12:30 pm to pmac012
quote:
All the people on this board saying Bud is crap need to check national sales figures for AB
quote:
They still own the beer market nationwide. All those people can't all be wrong.
I wonder how many CD's Britney Spears and the Backstreet Boys have sold combined? I think the Spice Girls sold around 750 million or so by themselves. All those CD buyers can't be wrong. How many units did The Pet Rock sell? Chia Pets?
Posted on 11/24/08 at 12:30 pm to LSU85750
quote:
stella artois
It's hard to believe is is a Belgian beer.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 1:02 pm to BigAlBR
quote:
All the people on this board saying Bud is crap need to check national sales figures for AB. They still own the beer market nationwide. All those people can't all be wrong.
BS. See the previous post about Britney Spears and Backstreet boys to see what the popular music sellars are. Totally means nothing.
Your local Red Lobster/Joes Crap Shack/Bennigans will probably have lines out the door every weekend, but it means nothing as to if it is good.
Marketing, marketing, marketing, is all the mass produced brews are about.
With that being said, I do drink bud products over Miller/Coors if I have to choose. I believe the merger will hurt bud somewhat in the view of their customers because of it not being an American company.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 6:18 pm to geauxcubs23
I to "donate" my money to Abita whenever possible, although it is tough to get in VA. I can concede to the idea that Bud may lose some marketing, but very unlikely. It is at the point that I think more Americans are aware of what is going on with the exchange rate and hope that we try to keep as much raw revenue here as possible, but we cannot keep up with the lower labor costs abroad.
Posted on 11/25/08 at 10:28 am to FredSecunda
quote:
Budweiser (not Bud Light) is the best American domestic beer.
Anchor Brewing's (San Francisco) Steam beer is one of the oldest American domestic beers, and very good.
Rogue Ale's (Newport, Oregon) American Amber ale crushes anything that Anheiseur-Busch makes or has made during my lifetime.
Boston Beer Co (Sam Adams) would probably throw Boston Lager into the mix, although the Boston Ale is also very good.
Those are three examples of American domestic beers that are better than Budweiser. There are many others.
Now, if you want to argue that Budweiser is the best American Light Lager (similar to a pilsner in style)... there are still other American-owned, American-made, American-grown products that are better. They just don't advertise as much.
Posted on 11/25/08 at 10:36 am to lsudupont82
quote:
it just didn't feel right. so i started drinking coors for a while.
I am pretty sure Coors is owned (or at least partially owned) by Molson, a Canadian brewing company. So unless your post was sarcastic your switch didn't get your point across very well.
Posted on 11/25/08 at 11:01 am to booga
Coors does operate in conjunction with Molson. Not sure about the details.
Posted on 11/25/08 at 4:27 pm to Woody
Beer, as much as anything else these days, is a global product. Because most Americans drink cheap swill such as Budweiser and never expand their beer palates, they're unaware of this revelation. Now, being owned by InBev will in no way effect how your Budweiser tastes. That is probably the biggest concern amongst those that drink it. What it will do is give Budweiser an even bigger distribution. That means that if you find yourself somewhere outside of the United States, you'll have no problem finding a Bud. On the flip side, it also means you'll probably be able to buy a Becks or a Stella in Cut Off, Louisiana. The big brewers, i.e, AB, Miller/Coors/Molson, etc. don't care about the beer. They care about marketing ploys and distribution. AB, who glossed Budweiser as The King of Beers is in reality, the King of Marketing. People will buy and use damn near enything if you spend enough money telling them to do so. Look at Coors Light. They market the fricking can the beer comes in as opposed to the beer. The thing that scares me about the merger is not what it will mean for AB, but what it will mean for beer drinkers. There are thousands of great breweries in this world whose biggest problem is distribution. Some of these breweries are coveted by the big boys and some are not. Of those that are not wanted, they'll simply be driven out of business because they can't get their product to consumers because local distributors sign contracts with AB,InBev,Miller,Coors,Molson, etc. Many will sign these contracts with the stipulation that they not distribute certain other beers. Viola! Micro-brewer is out of business. However, this concept is not foreign to AB as they employed similar tactics in the past. But, with InBev now in control, they possess even more clout and can easily squash competitors. I could go on and on about this, but I doubt you're that interested.
Posted on 11/25/08 at 5:52 pm to BEAUXREGARD
quote:
but I doubt you're that interested.
I am very interested.
Thanks for all of the knowledge you share about beer and like you, I will do all I can to support microbrews.
Popular
Back to top

1




