Started By
Message
locked post

Trade dispute that needs an objective eye

Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:19 pm
Posted by Douglas Quaid
Mars
Member since Mar 2010
4121 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:19 pm
12 team PPR league with playable roster as follows:
QB, RB, RB/WR, WR, WR, WR/TE, TE, K

Team A (record is 2-4):
QB - Stafford, Fitzpatrick, Matt Ryan
RB - Ray Rice, Starks, Reggie Bush, Spiller
WR - Nicks, Bowe, Antonio Brown, Kevin Walter, James Jones
TE - Finley, Vernon Davis

Team B (record is 1-5):
QB - Romo, Cassel
RB - CJ2K, Mendenhall, Turner, Jon Stewart
WR - Hester, Santana Moss, Lance Moore, Randall Cobb
TE - Aaron Hernandez, Fred Davis


Team B is disappointed with CJ2K performance and needs an elite WR. Team A offers the following:

Hakeem Nicks, James Jones, and choice of Finley or Vernon Davis for CJ2K, Santana Moss, and Hernandez.

Team B accepts.


Team A gets CJ2K, Moss, Hernandez
Team B gets Nicks, Vernon Davis, James Jones


Is this trade worthy of a veto?

Posted by auyushu
Surprise, AZ
Member since Jan 2011
9999 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:24 pm to
Why the hell would anyone veto that? Pretty much a dead even trade.
Posted by citgojosh27
lake charles
Member since Aug 2008
469 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:32 pm to
Ghats as fair of a trade as I've ever seen
Posted by BURASBOI
Member since Mar 2007
1827 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:33 pm to
LINK

Same league?
Posted by Douglas Quaid
Mars
Member since Mar 2010
4121 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:52 pm to
Yup. Just trying to get a few objective opinions on the fairness of the trade. Wondering if anyone would veto it if it were their league.
Posted by BURASBOI
Member since Mar 2007
1827 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:58 pm to
Not vetoable
Posted by Boosh Dag
Member since Oct 2011
1667 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 6:59 pm to
Unfair trade but not vetoable.
Posted by Douglas Quaid
Mars
Member since Mar 2010
4121 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

unfair


Does the trade not improve both starting lineups?
Posted by BURASBOI
Member since Mar 2007
1827 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:18 pm to
Switching CJ for mendy or turner would make it more fair
Posted by Douglas Quaid
Mars
Member since Mar 2010
4121 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:24 pm to
Team B isn't happy with CJ's performance thus far. Both Turner and Mendenhall have put up more.

The only question is if the trade is worthy of a veto?
Posted by Boosh Dag
Member since Oct 2011
1667 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

The only question is if the trade is worthy of a veto?


No it's not.
Posted by BURASBOI
Member since Mar 2007
1827 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:29 pm to
I'm guessing your team A
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:38 pm to
Is there a reason to think the two are colluding together? Otherwise, why on Earth would you veto a trade? A bad trade =/= a vetoable trade.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 8:01 pm to
Not even close to worth a veto IMO.

People get too caught up in trying to make the points even out.

Trying a no. 1 WR for a no. 1 RB, swapping top tier TEs and WRs with different limitations but still limitations, is fine.
Posted by Douglas Quaid
Mars
Member since Mar 2010
4121 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:58 am to
quote:

Not even close to worth a veto IMO.


Thank you. We have a member threatening to leave the league over this trade.
Posted by croxley
Who Dat Nation
Member since Jan 2009
457 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 1:39 am to
I see it as a fair trade. Nothing to veto about at all.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 7:51 am to
quote:

We have a member threatening to leave the league over this trade.


1) Say goodbye to the a-hole.
2) Replace with someone cool.
3) Enjoy FFL again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram