- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL Week 7
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:20 pm to PortCityTiger24
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:20 pm to PortCityTiger24
LSUAlum2001 needs to stop talking about his other leagues.
Let him know we DGAF
Let him know we DGAF
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:21 pm to rondo
quote:
Let him know we DGAF
Point taken, but IDGAF what you think.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:22 pm to PortCityTiger24
Big Port making moves!

Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:27 pm to PortCityTiger24
Nice doing business with you.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:47 pm to LSUAlum2001
That's possible in this format too. SFP is in 5th place @ 4-2 with the 11th most points scored.
I think the differnece between this format and head-to-head is marginal when it comes to getting the best teams in the playoffs.
I think the differnece between this format and head-to-head is marginal when it comes to getting the best teams in the playoffs.
This post was edited on 10/18/11 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 10/18/11 at 1:49 pm to CE Tiger
I'd take CJ2K but don't see any of your wrs that I'd be interested in other than Vjax. Don't think it'd work out.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 2:00 pm to Lester Earl
Hands are tied Les.
I've tried 3 other people in the conference and at the end of the day, I need a rb that's gonna see 12+ touches.
I bet on having 2 rb carry me and I lost.
I've tried 3 other people in the conference and at the end of the day, I need a rb that's gonna see 12+ touches.
I bet on having 2 rb carry me and I lost.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 2:01 pm to LSUAlum2001
I would throw in Cutler into that deal, so you would have a starter this week.
Best is a risky, risky trade. I could be trading for someone who may not play another down. Are you looking for a RB or WR or what?
I would move Holmes, BJGE, Starks, or really almost anyone. The only thing I am not interested in is trading Mathews (or Wallace, not sure why that would take place) for Roddy.
Best is a risky, risky trade. I could be trading for someone who may not play another down. Are you looking for a RB or WR or what?
I would move Holmes, BJGE, Starks, or really almost anyone. The only thing I am not interested in is trading Mathews (or Wallace, not sure why that would take place) for Roddy.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 3:35 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Reddfigg you out there?
Posted on 10/18/11 at 3:49 pm to GynoSandberg
Just got back in the office.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 3:55 pm to reddman
Here's what's holding me up with our possible deal:
1. Fitz already had his bye week. MJD hasn't had his yet.
2. MJD averages 14.28 pts per week. My current RB2 (Stewart) averages. 11.50 per week. Do I really wanna trade away my best WR for less than three extra points every week?
3. You having AJ, Megatron, and Fitz on the same team just doesnt seem fair.
1. Fitz already had his bye week. MJD hasn't had his yet.
2. MJD averages 14.28 pts per week. My current RB2 (Stewart) averages. 11.50 per week. Do I really wanna trade away my best WR for less than three extra points every week?
3. You having AJ, Megatron, and Fitz on the same team just doesnt seem fair.
This post was edited on 10/18/11 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 10/18/11 at 4:10 pm to reddman
quote:
Do I really wanna trade away my best WR for less than three extra points every week?
What if he threw in a Pierre Thomas or a LT?
Posted on 10/18/11 at 4:13 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
any interest in Lynch
Depends on the cost!
Posted on 10/18/11 at 4:27 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
What if he threw in a Pierre Thomas or a LT?
Posted on 10/18/11 at 4:47 pm to GynoSandberg
I have been laughing at you two going back and forth. Knat mentions LT & Thomas, you counter with Ridley, and then you think it's done.
Then 2 hours later Knat starts talking about Pierre Thomas.
Then 2 hours later Knat starts talking about Pierre Thomas.
Posted on 10/18/11 at 4:51 pm to PortCityTiger24
Knats annoyingness rivals only LE. Too bad his team sucks
Popular
Back to top



1






