- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:24 am to PortCityTiger24
AFC vs NFC is stupid.
im open to just about anything else. I like my keepers, but wouldnt mind just making this a year to year league
im open to just about anything else. I like my keepers, but wouldnt mind just making this a year to year league
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:25 am to reddman
32 teams
4 8-team conferances
4 player pools
4 8-team conferances
4 player pools
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:27 am to PortCityTiger24
my vote is 16--3 keepers.
maximum QB roster at 2.
top 8 scores get wins.
maximum QB roster at 2.
top 8 scores get wins.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:29 am to Lester Earl
I really like the 20 team league idea. The only thin I can think of that might suck is the trading of draft picks the following year. With 2 player pools you would have to be in the same conference the following season for that to work.
Unless y'all wanted to scrap that all together. I like the idea of trading picks but I'm not attached to it.
Unless y'all wanted to scrap that all together. I like the idea of trading picks but I'm not attached to it.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:30 am to Toula
I suggest a committee of like 4 owners get together on g-chat and come up with a plan, or maybe two or three viable scenarios. Then, present those scenarios to the rest of the league and get some input.
Right now, we have a bunch of us just spitballing and there are so many different ways to go.
I don't need to be on the panel, but will be if necessary.
Right now, we have a bunch of us just spitballing and there are so many different ways to go.
I don't need to be on the panel, but will be if necessary.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:33 am to reddman
And port, your next poll may need to be something like....
Would you be opposed to reducing or eliminating the number of keepers this year (exact number to be determined)?
If you have several that are opposed to changing the keeper rules for the upcoming year, it may give you a better idea of which direction to go from there.
Just my two cents.
Would you be opposed to reducing or eliminating the number of keepers this year (exact number to be determined)?
If you have several that are opposed to changing the keeper rules for the upcoming year, it may give you a better idea of which direction to go from there.
Just my two cents.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:34 am to PortCityTiger24
what is the 20 team proposal?
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:34 am to reddman
quote:
I suggest a committee of like 4 owners get together on g-chat and come up with a plan
i'm free all day...we for sure need to get 3-4 viable options for a vote.
then maybe a final vote on the top 2
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:34 am to Lester Earl
quote:
what is the 20 team proposal?
20 teams
2 conferences
2 player pools
ten teams in each conference.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:39 am to reddman
Winners of each conference play in a superbowl
no keepers, unless we keep conferences locked.
no keepers, unless we keep conferences locked.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:40 am to reddman
quote:
20 teams
2 conferences
2 player pools
ten teams in each conference.
i like!
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:41 am to Lester Earl
quote:
20 teams 2 conferences 2 player pools ten teams in each conference.
What about keepers Les?
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:43 am to Drunken Clams
keepers are stupid in football imo
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:43 am to Drunken Clams
I think Les has let his feelings about keepers in football leagues known.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:45 am to reddman
yes, they are stupid!
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:45 am to Lester Earl
I cant say i disagree.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:46 am to reddman
quote:
reddman
you have the experience in this 20 team format, so I'll value your opinion.
Ever find the case where one division benefits more from having weaker owners?
Without having keepers involved, I'd think some teams just shutdown shop when the playoffs were out of reach.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:49 am to Toula
quote:
some teams just shutdown shop when the playoffs were out of reach.
Bottom feeder (aka msu) fee
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:53 am to Toula
quote:
you have the experience in this 20 team format, so I'll value your opinion.
Ever find the case where one division benefits more from having weaker owners?
Without having keepers involved, I'd think some teams just shutdown shop when the playoffs were out of reach.
i dont thnk that would be a problem if we were selective and charged say 80-100 per head
Page 5 of 39
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News