- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should this type of trade be banned?
Posted on 11/4/22 at 10:41 pm to TheRouxGuru
Posted on 11/4/22 at 10:41 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
look at all the mental gymnastics you had to do just now to try to make this sound even close to being legit
It’s not mental gymnastics. Another pair of plahers at the top and bottom can just do the same thing and try to mess up the other two’s plan.
quote:
There’s not going to be anything in the official fantasy football rulebook about this, but come on.
It could easily been worked into the rules to not allow this.
Trade deadlines.
Transaction limits in a certain time period
Restrictions on if you can maintain a keeper after a certain amount of transactions or back to the same team.
Easily can be fixed with rules. But this league doesn’t specify this scenario. So let others do the same and try to frick these two’s plan.
quote:
This is bush league
Don’t disagree at all
0
Posted on 11/4/22 at 11:12 pm to RJL2
What’s your reaction going to be if you wake up tomorrow and realize that the league vetoed your trade?
Posted on 11/5/22 at 2:01 pm to RJL2
quote:
Buy in is 500
No it’s not. No one makes this trade in a high stakes league
This is a free league or like a $20 league
Posted on 11/5/22 at 2:33 pm to RJL2
I wouldn't be playing in a league with either of you moving forward.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:05 am to RJL2
This is a troll
The proposed trade doesn’t even make sense. “Renting” those players for weeks just to swap the two top 5 backs? Going out of his way to help a good 3-5 team get into the playoffs? There’s zero upside to the 7-1 team.
Add in that this trade was supposedly negotiated in the the group chat, other players aren’t pitching a fit, and there’s no vetos (not even commish vetos?)…yea, it’s a fabrication
The proposed trade doesn’t even make sense. “Renting” those players for weeks just to swap the two top 5 backs? Going out of his way to help a good 3-5 team get into the playoffs? There’s zero upside to the 7-1 team.
Add in that this trade was supposedly negotiated in the the group chat, other players aren’t pitching a fit, and there’s no vetos (not even commish vetos?)…yea, it’s a fabrication
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News