- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:27 pm to The Pain Train
That ain't official
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:40 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Not technically official but everything points toward a 10 game suspension being the case, even Josh's response to it.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:48 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
10 games might be too much for me to justify the bench spot. I'll sleep on it and see what I think in the morning.
I'm keeping him. I think my teams solid enough
Posted on 9/13/14 at 8:39 am to Weagle25
I wonder if anything is going to pass? No news from either side.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 8:54 am to forksup
quote:
I wonder if anything is going to pass? No news from either side.
FWIW, yahoo sports put up his point projections starting week 12.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:14 am to TaderSalad
quote:Is that normal for them to put up point projections that far in advance?
FWIW, yahoo sports put up his point projections starting week 12.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:21 am to TaderSalad
Interesting... I guess we find out if Josh is happy with 10 or if he'll file an injunction. I sort of hope he doesn't... Just keep training, work your way through the dealership for 2 more months, keep his profile low, then boom.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:22 am to boom roasted
Yes
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:32 am to forksup
I think he will take 10 as he accrues a year towards FA and a lawsuit against the NFL is a losing proposition which would likely cost more than his missed game checks.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:40 am to NOFOX
quote:
I think he will take 10 as he accrues a year towards FA and a lawsuit against the NFL is a losing proposition which would likely cost more than his missed game checks.
I am hoping he doesn't sue. As it stands, I should make the playoffs (if I can keep him in one of my four bench spots) and would much rather he be around for that end of the season, rather than suing and just postponing the banishment for a few games earlier.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:03 am to TaderSalad
I still have no idea where this mysterious fourth violation is coming from
Plus it seems the NFL just made up a bunch of shite regarding retroactivity
Plus it seems the NFL just made up a bunch of shite regarding retroactivity
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:05 am to jimithing11
He entered the league in stage 2
Codeine > 3rd violation
Last feb's failure > 4th?
Codeine > 3rd violation
Last feb's failure > 4th?
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:11 am to Honkus
Na codeine was second because the first one is essentially a warning
Second failed NFL tests got 4 games under old policy
This past winter was his third, but he was already in stage 3 because of the negotiated deal to get codeine failure from 4 to 2
So this was only his second failure in the NFL but if you count college it was his third
To me, it seems like they are double counting one of the tests, maybe the codeine. Which is bullshite
Second failed NFL tests got 4 games under old policy
This past winter was his third, but he was already in stage 3 because of the negotiated deal to get codeine failure from 4 to 2
So this was only his second failure in the NFL but if you count college it was his third
To me, it seems like they are double counting one of the tests, maybe the codeine. Which is bullshite
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:08 am to jimithing11
quote:
Jason Cole ?@JasonPhilCole 3h
People should also understand not all players were in favor of cutting #Browns WR Josh Gordon a break. Many think he deserves what he got.
quote:
Tom Pelissero ?@TomPelissero 2h
So for everyone asking about Josh Gordon, it's my understanding his disputed positive still counts. Reduced ban because of extra steps.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:15 am to Nonetheless
quote:So they weren't fighting for Josh? Interesting.
People should also understand not all players were in favor of cutting #Browns WR Josh Gordon a break. Many think he deserves what he got.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:33 am to abellsujr
I think some of them wanted Gordon to use this as a growing moment. While it'd be great to have him as a fantasy starter, I'd be happy with the kid learning a great deal from this experience and becoming a better football player for it. Whatever happens, good for the kid. It's been fun 
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to forksup
quote:
While it'd be great to have him as a fantasy starter, I'd be happy with the kid learning a great deal from this experience and becoming a better football player for it.
actually thought about that during this whole process. Step aside from the fantasy aspect (
I know) Gordon wouldn't have learned anything if he got off free of charge. At least there's a better chance he won't frick up in the future since he just got banned 10 games. Maybe it's a wake up call.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to forksup
frick that. Sue the NFL and let's keep this thread rollin'!
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:46 am to jimithing11
Page 83 of 119
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News