Started By
Message

re: I just accepted the 49ers D for Steven Jackson.

Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:27 am to
Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22471 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:27 am to
Is this a money league? If so,
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:32 am to
In my league San Fran's D has scored a whopping 3 points more than the Viking's so far this season.
Posted by CQQ
Member since Feb 2006
17048 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:37 am to
Not how he saw this going. Steven Jackson sucks right now so I'll give you some confidence and say good trade
Posted by bleedpurplengold
Member since Feb 2007
1374 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:45 am to
in two of my money leagues people dropped sjax, so at least you got something out of him. I like the trade.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:58 am to
5th in mine.

I don't like it though. They have a tough playoff schedule. Jackson has a good playoff schedule.
Posted by Black Viking
Upper Lafayette
Member since Mar 2011
178 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:59 am to
quote:

If this post is not a joke, you just got got.


I really don't understand all of these people thinking S Jax has any value. We aren't in 2009 anymore, he hasn't been putting up any fantasy points and in my league has averaged 5 points a game.

Honestly, I don't see how you got anyone for him.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71960 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 11:02 am to
RBs are thin and he is still ranked inside the top 30 RBs. He's averaging 9 points per game.

The dude is starting Daniel Thomas.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 11:05 am to
quote:

RBs are thin and he is still ranked inside the top 30 RBs. He's averaging 9 points per game.

The dude is starting Daniel Thomas.


Exactly, he has more value than relying on Daniel Thomas week in and week out.
This post was edited on 11/8/12 at 11:09 am
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32383 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

A bottom half d? The 49ers are not bottom half.



Not in real life, but in FF they are.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 12:45 pm to
5th in my league. Top half.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

RBs are thin and he is still ranked inside the top 30 RBs. He's averaging 9 points per game.


He could easily have a blow up too if Richardson gets hurt or if Fisher decides to let Jackson carry the load like he probably should be. The guy is still really talented and had a great stretch last season, which included his raping of the Saints D
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 2:48 pm to
The Vikings have been torn to pieces the last couple weeks. San Fran only has 1 game is single digits.

2 objections at this point. I can afford 1 more.

Also, I'm not relying on DT. I'm expecting Ridely, Cam, CJ2k, Nelson, Wayne, Gonzalez to carry the team.
This post was edited on 11/8/12 at 2:50 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

San Fran only has 1 game in single digits.


WTF kind of scoring do you apply to defenses? I have with games of 4, 4, 3, and 1.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Also, I'm not relying on DT. I'm expecting Ridely, Cam, CJ2k, Nelson, Wayne, Gonzalez to carry the team


You plan on starting Thomas at flex, right? I'd rather have the option between S-Jax and Thomas. S-Jax is far mor talented and gets about the same amount of touches as Thomas.

In my league both San Fran and Minnesota have 4 games in single digits. I'd rather play matchups with Defenses and still have Thomas and S-Jax than rely on Thomas and San Francisco
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 6:37 pm to
3 objections.

1 more and it's in the shitter. I hate this league full of dbags. If I wasn't in first, I bet they wouldn't pull this shite.

They almost killed the Wes Welker for Cj2k deal.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71960 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 6:43 pm to
If you're in first, the other members of the league must be brain dead
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 6:44 pm to


I really want this to work. They also objected to a trade earlier this year and glad they did.

I gave

Welker
Sjax
Cam

for

AJ Green and Rivers.
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 11/9/12 at 4:35 am to
Trade made it through. 3 objections and that's the max I could have.



Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26613 posts
Posted on 11/9/12 at 8:03 am to
If I'm loaded at rb(i do) and don't have a consistent D(i do 49ers) i would.

in my league 49ers are 7th with 17ppg while The Texans are 2nd with 21ppg. All of the top 7 teams are consistent with at least 13pts every game except for the one or two times you know they will be bad.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 7:09 pm to
Still feeling great about this trade?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram