- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL Regular Season Thread
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:02 am to Lester Earl
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:02 am to Lester Earl
No, you're correct.
I just fricked up in not keep reading the Constitution.
I just fricked up in not keep reading the Constitution.
0
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:07 am to rondo
quote:
Yeah imo, the mistake was having the IP category and then a minimum IP requirement that is so high.
Where was everyone when I was saying this months ago?
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:07 am to GynoSandberg
I was banned
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:16 am to Lester Earl
probably right, but why stipulate active roster? what is the benefit of having a milb player in your active roster?
If you kept an milb player in your reserve spot you get to keep that guy plus not have to drop another one of your milb players essentially giving you 11 or more milb players.
If you kept an milb player in your reserve spot you get to keep that guy plus not have to drop another one of your milb players essentially giving you 11 or more milb players.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 11:39 am to swamie
I think it's there to promote competitive play and so an owner wont load up on a ton of minor league guys.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:33 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I think it's there to promote competitive play and so an owner wont load up on a ton of minor league guys.
Exactly, see TDBL the last couple of seasons
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:34 pm to barry
The JewT rule
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:41 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Realistically, on any given week, you can be at 45+ innings on Sunday and have four or more of your starting pitchers throwing that day, and unless you have four bench pitchers, each one of those pitchers MUST be in the starting lineup.
Well, yea it CAN happen, but it will be the exception more than the rule.
The same thing could happen in TDBL even though we don't have an IP cat. The benefits of making rosters stay full far outweighs the crap that ensues when you can leaves spots open or coming up with exceptions to that rule. If you are gonna have 4 starts on a day, plan accordingly.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:44 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Active roster is not your bench, if I'm not mistaken.
Active Roster are the guys that are actually in your starting lineup
I assumed active roster to be non-DL non minor league spots.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:47 pm to barry
that's my point in stock piling minor talent. even if it's not active, you can still do it in reserve.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:48 pm to barry
Active roster- guys that earn you points (starting lineup)
reserve roster- bench guys
A guy on your bench technically isnt active.
That's how i see it
reserve roster- bench guys
A guy on your bench technically isnt active.
That's how i see it
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:52 pm to Lester Earl
if the spirit of the rule is to stop people from stockpiling minors players, being able to keep them on your reserve doesn't mitigate the problem.
but yes, it is worded poorly since active in these terms can mean your starting 18.
but yes, it is worded poorly since active in these terms can mean your starting 18.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:57 pm to Lester Earl
What would be the point of capping minor league roster then allowing people to have them on their bench?
If a minor league player has never been called up, he shouldn't kept anywhere but the major league roster.
If a minor league player has never been called up, he shouldn't kept anywhere but the major league roster.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:57 pm to swamie
quote:
if the spirit of the rule is to stop people from stockpiling minors players, being able to keep them on your reserve doesn't mitigate the problem.
as long as you are playing active players, i dont think there is much of a problem with stashing minor leaguers on your bench, if you are so inclined.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:00 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
i dont think there is much of a problem with stashing minor leaguers on your bench, if you are so inclined.
Thats great, but its about the rule thats in place, not what you think.
Active is our league means the same thing as the Active 25 man roster in MLB, its your major league roster.
If anyone has minor leaguers who have never been called up on their bench needs to move them to their minor league roster.
This post was edited on 4/12/15 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:01 pm to barry
quote:
What would be the point of capping minor league roster then allowing people to have them on their bench?
i dont see a big deal with them overlapping.
The point of having a cap is the same reason we have a cap on bench players. You have to draw the line somewhere.
quote:
If a minor league player has never been called up, he shouldn't kept anywhere but the major league roster.
why not? is there a good reason for this?
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:02 pm to barry
quote:
If a minor league player has never been called up
so the rule won't apply to players with MLB experience who was sent down to the minors?
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:05 pm to swamie
quote:
so the rule won't apply to players with MLB experience who was sent down to the minors?
Correct. The rule is their because it would be a pain in the arse to make sure people move guys up and down as they move up and down in real life. But this gives people the option to stash them on their minor league roster if they want to have an active player on their team until the player hits the IP or AB threshold.
"c) Once a player has played in a MLB game, he can be moved back and forth from the minors to the active roster until the threshold is hit. Once that happens, the player can no longer be placed on a minor league roster, even if the player is actually no longer on an MLB active roster."
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:07 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
why not? is there a good reason for this?
My bad it should have said minor league roster.
The point is for competitive balance, not a problem now but if people start stockpiling minor league players, then they will start stockpiling their bench too and will field a less competitive team.
Posted on 4/12/15 at 2:18 pm to barry
Can I get Ray Black placed back on my team?
I dropped him thinking I had to move Rusney down to the minors and picked up Cliff Lee
I dropped him thinking I had to move Rusney down to the minors and picked up Cliff Lee
Page 12 of 143
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News