- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL Championship: 8th Seed RDR wins Ship
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:48 am to Toula
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:48 am to Toula
quote:
I don't see how they are different. Post season either counts or doesn't. Surely you see how they are related.
im with you, i hadnt thought of it like that. But if Mondesi is getting postseason games carried over, i think Baez too. It should be one or the other
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:52 am to GynoSandberg
I just think it's an interesting case study. What if a stud prospect is catching all year and gets called up in Sept and hits and plays first for 10 games. Does he lose his C?
A versatile prospect like Baez has 1 month to get elig at all the positions he plays. Kind of impossible.
Fine either way. My initial question on post season games counting was legit though. If it doesn't, It doesn't.
A versatile prospect like Baez has 1 month to get elig at all the positions he plays. Kind of impossible.
Fine either way. My initial question on post season games counting was legit though. If it doesn't, It doesn't.
This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 9:55 am
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:55 am to Toula
quote:
What if a stud prospect is catching all year and gets called up in Sept and hits and plays first for 10 games. Does he lose his C?
Yes, he does.
It might not be 'fair' but that's how the rules go.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:09 am to Toula
Mondesi was a special case where his situation wasn't clearly defined in the constitution, so a ruling was made.
Position eligibility is clearly defined in the constitution.
Position eligibility is clearly defined in the constitution.
This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 10:09 am
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:14 am to LSUBoo
quote:
What if a stud prospect is catching all year and gets called up in Sept and hits and plays first for 10 games. Does he lose his C?
Yes, he does.
It might not be 'fair' but that's how the rules go.
My understanding is that a player will never lose positional eligibility mid-season.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:15 am to rondo
quote:
My understanding is that a player will never lose positional eligibility mid-season.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Correct, he would lose it for the next season. At least until he has 5 appearances at C.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:16 am to rondo
He is talking about the next season, Rondo
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:17 am to Toula
quote:
I just think it's an interesting case study. What if a stud prospect is catching all year and gets called up in Sept and hits and plays first for 10 games. Does he lose his C?
I don't think MiLB positioning matters imo. It should be based on MLB positioning, if not for the mere fact that that's what fantrax counts
quote:
A versatile prospect like Baez has 1 month to get elig at all the positions he plays. Kind of impossible
I mean, that's just the way it's been in any league you play in. It's an MLB league counting MLB stats etc. minor positions is irrelevant to me
quote:
Fine either way. My initial question on post season games counting was legit though. If it doesn't, It doesn't.
I don't think the commish can go in and give him SS eligibility. It appears fantrax only counts reg season. What can we do?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:21 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
I don't think the commish can go in and give him SS eligibility. It appears fantrax only counts reg season. What can we do?
Definitely can edit any player's eligibility, but the rules are pretty clear on this.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:22 am to RollDatRoll
gotcha...sounds like he is bitching for the sake of bitching.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:23 am to rondo
Just love some creamer and contradiction with my
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:26 am to Toula
toulatowntiger is the better toulatiger on this board these days
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:26 am to reddman
quote:
Mondesi was a special case where his situation wasn't clearly defined in the constitution, so a ruling was made.
Position eligibility is clearly defined in the constitution.
if you can apply postseason games to Raul Mondesi, with the way the rule is written, you can apply postseason games to Baez too.
Mondesi:
quote:
c) Once a player has played in a MLB game, he can be moved back and forth from the minors to the active roster until the threshold is hit.
Baez:
quote:
E. Position Eligibility
1. Players gain position eligibility by playing 10 games the previous season or 5 in the current season.
why, for Baez, does "game"= regular season, by default, and for Mondesi, "game"= regular/postseason?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:29 am to Lester Earl
It's clearly defined Marle
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:30 am to Lester Earl
what happened here, and it is ok to admit, is that no one saw another loophole when we allowed Mondesi to be put on the MLB roster.
the rule wasn't written in full detail, but we kind of all knew that it should be regular season games only, by default, unless otherwise specified, especially now that there is a loophole with position eligibility.
With that said, I agree with Rondo, id rather revert Mondesi back to a MiLB than grant Baez that position eligibility. An easy way to fix this would be to make postseason games irrelevant to any eligibility rule.
the rule wasn't written in full detail, but we kind of all knew that it should be regular season games only, by default, unless otherwise specified, especially now that there is a loophole with position eligibility.
With that said, I agree with Rondo, id rather revert Mondesi back to a MiLB than grant Baez that position eligibility. An easy way to fix this would be to make postseason games irrelevant to any eligibility rule.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:31 am to Lester Earl
You can't manually give him SS eligibility regardless
The frick you want to do?
The frick you want to do?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:32 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
You can't manually give him SS eligibility regardless
The frick you want to do?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 10:34 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
You can't manually give him SS eligibility regardless
The frick you want to do?
quote:
With that said, I agree with Rondo, id rather revert Mondesi back to a MiLB than grant Baez that position eligibility. An easy way to fix this would be to make postseason games irrelevant to any eligibility rule.
Popular
Back to top


0







