- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:54 am to Toula
Because he didn't start, he was put in later in the game. Therefore it doesn't show up as a game played I believe.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:11 am to Chatagnier
Confused to what you are saying Chat.
IIRC, the committee ruled that Mondesi getting an AB in the World Series makes him eligible to be on a MLB roster.
So post season stats apply to some rules and not others..?
Either way, a dude that played 49% of his total games at a position the year before should be eligible there.
IIRC, the committee ruled that Mondesi getting an AB in the World Series makes him eligible to be on a MLB roster.
So post season stats apply to some rules and not others..?
Either way, a dude that played 49% of his total games at a position the year before should be eligible there.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:12 am to Toula
One is eligiblity to be on a MLB roster. The other is positional eligibility.
Puttimg Mondesi on the MLB roster is of almost zero value.
Giving Baez ss eligibility has lots of value.
If you were to force me to choose I would take away Mondesi's MLB eligibilty before granting Baez' ss eligibility
Puttimg Mondesi on the MLB roster is of almost zero value.
Giving Baez ss eligibility has lots of value.
If you were to force me to choose I would take away Mondesi's MLB eligibilty before granting Baez' ss eligibility
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:13 am to rondo
quote:
If you were to force me to choose I would take away Mondesi's MLB eligibilty before granting Baez' ss eligibility
I concur. Post-season stats shouldn't count.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:20 am to Chatagnier
quote:
I believe he didn't even receive an AB he was put in as a pinch runner.
No, he pinch hit and struck out.
Post-season ABs don't count toward anything other than post-season stats though. So that one AB wouldn't count toward his 400 AB minors eligibility in this league.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:23 am to LSUBoo
Gotcha. Maybe that's an ammendment to add to the constitution.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:27 am to rondo
quote:
One is eligiblity to be on a MLB roster. The other is positional eligibility.
Puttimg Mondesi on the MLB roster is of almost zero value.
Giving Baez ss eligibility has lots of value.
Ah. I see. So committee ruled post season stats count when it's zero value, but they don't count when it has lots of value.
First year in the league. Do you guys typically change how you interpret rules based on value and who it's helping?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:30 am to Toula
I don't make the final call pal.
I don't even think I commented on the Mondesi ruling.
I don't even think I commented on the Mondesi ruling.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:31 am to LSUBoo
quote:
Post-season ABs don't count toward anything other than post-season stats though. So that one AB wouldn't count toward his 400 AB minors eligibility in this league.
this is a very important distinction.
If the ABs and IP don't count towards a players MiLB eligibility clock then they shouldn't count towards anything.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:35 am to rondo
Post season stuff aside.
Here's where I thing we need a clear ruling.
Player has a clear primary position in the MiLB. Gets called up in September, but does not meet the required 10 at his primary position. Does he lose that primary position eligibility?
Here's where I thing we need a clear ruling.
Player has a clear primary position in the MiLB. Gets called up in September, but does not meet the required 10 at his primary position. Does he lose that primary position eligibility?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:40 am to Toula
quote:
Post season stuff aside.
As it should be.
quote:
Here's where I thing we need a clear ruling.
Player has a clear primary position in the MiLB. Gets called up in September, but does not meet the required 10 at his primary position. Does he lose that primary position eligibility?
There is a clear ruling... it's actually in the rules as such:
quote:
Position Eligibility
Games needed from previous season for a player to qualify at a hitting position : 10
Games needed from current season for a player to qualify at a hitting position: 5
Starts needed from previous season for a player to qualify as a starter : 10
Starts needed from current season for a player to qualify as a starter : 5
Relief appearances needed from previous season for a player to qualify as a reliever : 10
Relief appearances needed from current season for a player to qualify as a reliever: 5
Use Fantrax's default position(s) in addition to any position(s) a player qualifies for based on above criteria: No
Note: If a player does not qualify for any positions based on the above selections, he will qualify at the position(s) played most in the previous season. If he did not play at all last season, then the default position(s) will be used.
He played 17 games at 2B and 11 at 3B last season, so he's eligible in those two positions. Had he NOT reached 10 games at any position, it would have gone back to whichever position he played the most, or if he didn't play at all it would revert to his default position, which I assume Fantrax bases on his Minors appearances.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:46 am to rondo
quote:
f the ABs and IP don't count towards a players MiLB eligibility clock then they shouldn't count towards anything.
This I agree with.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:05 am to dj30
Fantrax controls positional eligibility regardless
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:33 am to GynoSandberg
Lol at Toulbag trying to use the Mondesi ruling as a way to get Baez SS eligibility.
No shame in his game, that's for sure.
No shame in his game, that's for sure.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:38 am to reddman
I don't see how they are different. Post season either counts or doesn't. Surely you see how they are related.
Also don't see how we penalize September callups for coming up and playing a different position than they played all year.
Also don't see how we penalize September callups for coming up and playing a different position than they played all year.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:43 am to Toula
No worries. As soon as he starts 5 games at SS this year, he will be SS eligible. 
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:43 am to Toula
You want their minor league positions to carry over?
Posted on 3/24/16 at 9:44 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
You want their minor league positions to carry over?
It would, if he didn't gain eligibility at two other positions last season.
Popular
Back to top



2







