- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/23/12 at 11:55 pm to Drew Orleans
I like the last small deal you sent me. I think I could flip one of those two and one of my RBs for a better RB. I'll have to see.
I think the only way I could trade Jimmy, is if I got Forte. I don't consider Murray a sure thing, but I do consider Forte that. Is he untouchable or no?
I think the only way I could trade Jimmy, is if I got Forte. I don't consider Murray a sure thing, but I do consider Forte that. Is he untouchable or no?
Posted on 8/23/12 at 11:57 pm to GynoSandberg
What you thinking for Sproles.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 11:58 pm to DCBJR6
I guess I'd consider forte but would need a very good offer seeing how he is my #1 pick.
The one that has us +30 and +17 would help both of us a ton, even though it includes Mathews.
You have to keep in mind Murray was a rookie last year.
The one that has us +30 and +17 would help both of us a ton, even though it includes Mathews.
You have to keep in mind Murray was a rookie last year.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 11:59 pm to Drew Orleans
I didn't see the one for Matthews. Let me look again.
It's not that I think Murray was a fluke last year, I'd be a little worried about his ankle.
ETA: I don't see a trade with Matthews in it? Did you definitely send it? I'll check my email.
It's not that I think Murray was a fluke last year, I'd be a little worried about his ankle.
ETA: I don't see a trade with Matthews in it? Did you definitely send it? I'll check my email.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:01 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:01 am to DCBJR6
I'm an idiot, I meant Graham. Not Mathews.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:04 am to Drew Orleans
Ah I see.
Ok first shot at Forte, I had him, Decker, Lloyd, Celek
For
Beanie, Williams, Jennings, Graham, and Washington
Ok first shot at Forte, I had him, Decker, Lloyd, Celek
For
Beanie, Williams, Jennings, Graham, and Washington
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:10 am to DCBJR6
id like to package sproles/finley to ya
i don't think you have a RB that would work in a package though
i don't think you have a RB that would work in a package though
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:13 am to GynoSandberg
Damnit. 
I like Sproles a lot.
ETA: Rodgers might not be untouchable..
I like Sproles a lot.
ETA: Rodgers might not be untouchable..
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:15 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:15 am to DCBJR6
I think we had talked about Sproles/Finley for Graham/BJGE.. you were going to think on it?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:20 am to DCBJR6
Interesting but i'm afraid of jenning's concussions. Throw in starting QBs?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:22 am to Iona Fan Man
Kash, I made you a couple of good offers where we are both in the green.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:23 am to Drew Orleans
quote:
Kash, I made you a couple of good offers where we are both in the green.
how quick you forgive
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:24 am to geauxlsu07
He's an arse but if it helps me, it helps me.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:27 am to Drew Orleans
Ya mama....i looked aibt nothing der
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:29 am to Iona Fan Man
Cancelled them to offer other trades. Check your e-mail and re-extend them if you like them.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:35 am to DCBJR6
quote:
ETA: Rodgers might not be untouchable..
If you see something, send it over and i'll take a looksie.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:38 am to Drew Orleans
I think I could throw in starting QBs if I took out Washington.
I just did some math and based on ESPN projections (with our settings) it shows:
What I'm getting - 1,158
What you're getting - 1,306 (with Washington)
- 1,138 (without)
ETA: Or I could replace Washington with Wright, if you'd include Cutler as Stafford insurance? That's not a deal breaker, though. Just for insurance with him being a little injury prone.
I just did some math and based on ESPN projections (with our settings) it shows:
What I'm getting - 1,158
What you're getting - 1,306 (with Washington)
- 1,138 (without)
ETA: Or I could replace Washington with Wright, if you'd include Cutler as Stafford insurance? That's not a deal breaker, though. Just for insurance with him being a little injury prone.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:41 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 4:23 am to DCBJR6
quote:
What I'm getting - 1,158
What you're getting - 1,306 (with Washington)
- 1,138 (without)
lol hack
I agree with your assessment, just that it's funny the hypocrisy.
who's the con artist those who rely on outside opinions or those who force you to rely on theirs?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 4:31 am to Iona Fan Man
I don't rely on numbers for every trade, but for a trade of that magnitude the numbers help to facilitate what's equal.
Plus, ESPN's fantasy experts are much better than the piece of crap projections Yahoo produces and that's something we all agree about.
Plus, ESPN's fantasy experts are much better than the piece of crap projections Yahoo produces and that's something we all agree about.
Page 157 of 296
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News